Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) shares fell more than 11% Friday, as the Securities and Exchange Commission placed BABA on a list of companies at risk of being delisted from U.S. stock markets. The issue is that China is not allowing U.S. regulators to review the work of Alibaba's (BABA) auditors. The SEC announced that Alibaba is now on the list of companies that have 3 years to comply with this law or face the potential of being delisted.
Improve your investment strategy by getting access to institutional-grade research tools and data from TipRanks. Get a 10% discount for TipRanks by using this link below:
https://bit.ly/3BJA7KJ
If you are a creator on YouTube like me, get access to TubeBuddy, the best research and channel management tool around. I use it everyday for my own channel. Here is a 20% coupon code for the platform: "TOMSBUDDY" - use this link to sign up: https://www.tubebuddy.com/TomNashTV
*Disclosure: I only recommend products I would use myself and all opinions expressed here are our own. This post may contain affiliate links that at no additional cost to you, I may earn a small commission.
👏👏 Big shout out to our growing list of Patreons. For those of you want (and can) support our channel, here is how you can help: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=13016082
The audio and video equipment I use to make videos:
* Sony A7Siii: https://amzn.to/3IW4AcF
* Sony 16-35 GM: https://amzn.to/3g7o4i2
* Ninja Atomos: https://amzn.to/3451Zya
* Rodecaster Pro: https://amzn.to/3KWUhqf
* Shure sm7b: https://amzn.to/3GfbasL
* Light Nova p300 C: https://amzn.to/3AIZb5M
DISCLAIMER: All of Tom's trades, strategies, and news coverage are based on his own opinions alone and are only done for entertainment purposes. If you are watching Tom's videos, please Don't take any of this content as guidance for buying or selling any type of investment or security. Tom Nash is not a financial advisor and anything said on this YouTube channel should not be seen as financial advice. Tom is merely sharing his own personal opinion. Your own results in the stock market or with any type of investment may not be typical and may vary from person to person. Please keep in mind that there are a lot of risks associated with investing in the stock market so do your own research and due diligence before making any investment decisions.

This is tom nash and in this video. I'm going to explain to you you exactly what's going on right now with chinese companies specifically alibaba with renewed listing fears. Now first of all i have to explain something to you there's really an oligopoly in the whole accounting. Scene there's only four companies that i actually.

Control i would guess. 999 of the public companies accounting auditing practice kpmg ey pwc and deloitte and there's others. But mainly if you're a public company listed on the us stock exchange. Most likely you're using one of these four.

And it's kind of a given now there used to be five. One more called arthur anderson that company went down with enron that's a whole different story might be a video in itself comment below. If you want to hear about that how it used to be the big five actually arthur anderson used to be the biggest. But now we're back to the big four now.

I actually specifically work for one of these big four companies for a long time. So know how things work and just to explain something to you i didn't actually audit financials. I actually worked for another department that did transactional services due diligence tax planning stuff like that. But i know how these things work and the way they work is very very simple the accountants that audit your financials are operating based on representations so basically when you are giving your data to the auditors.

The auditors do not go and re verify every single number bank statement and whatnot and the underlying numbers. You're providing. They're basically saying if the numbers you gave me are correct the way you. Present these based on gaap or us.

Gaap or ifrs whatever that may be is accurate unless. The accountants or the auditors. In this case have a suspicion they're not going to look into the underlying numbers to check. If there's actually any fraud and a lot of fraud cases got exposed and a lot of accountants and auditors never really caught them usually the ones who catch them is somebody else because this isn't really what auditors do now mainly mainly mainly here's the big problem with auditors.

There's this kind of weird relationship between auditors and companies on the one hand the company is a client on the other hand. The fiduciary duty of an auditor is not to its client. But rather to the truth. So it's a weird hybrid relationship.

Where somebody's paying you money. But essentially you're saying. Hey. I don't owe nothing to you.

It's a very problematic relationship. Let's put it this way. But the reason. I'm saying to you this whole spiel rant whatever the hell you want to call.

It is because there's only five words in the english language that actually terrified the out of chinese companies the public company accounting oversight board now these they look in into the underlying numbers they verify they're the sheriff. They're the ones who look into this and make sure. There's no fufuing going on no monkey business. No they'll come in and they'll check and if you actually are listed on the us stock exchange and you're reporting on us.
Gaap you are being supervised by the pcaob what have you done for me hey no intro. But all that is true unless you're a chinese company because chinese companies refuse systematically to get audited and to get regulated by the pcaob why i don't know. But here's the crazy part up until just a few years. Ago the us.

Regulators pretty much said okay now finally the sec came out and said hey guys you have three years to comply with this if you're not gonna show us your books. And you're not gonna let us review and regulate what the hell you're putting in there we're just not gonna let you stay on our us. Stock exchanges you can go home and you got three years now this is basically what's driving alibaba down. Because the sec came out and basically said hey we're adding alibaba to the list of companies that are basically candidates for the listing.

Now here's the thing and i want to be very clear about this. Ask yourself this question. Imagine you have two options option. Number one let somebody verify.

There's no accounting fraud in your company. Option. Number. Two do not allow that disagree and get the listed why would you agree to get the listed.

If there's no accounting fraud in your documentation. And reporting. I mean the principle alone isn't worth that right think about the amount of damage the amount of carnage these companies will go through if they actually get delisted. But if they have nothing to hide or nothing to fear.

Why would they agree to get shellac like that for me this doesn't add up. However it seems that there's others who tend to disagree. So i pulled up this seeking. Alpha article for you alibaba.

The listing theories are back time. To turn bullish. Again from jail research. So this is from seeking alpha let's read.

The article. So summary alibaba was struck by the listing fears again on july 29th. As the ussc. Added.

China's leading e commerce. Players to its the listing list as a result. Baba slumped. However check this this mother lover says.

We urge investors not to overreact to such fears. Alibaba is seeking a primary listing in hong kong. That would enable it to access capital and liquidity from chinese investors. So basically what this guy is saying.

Hey so this company is about to get the listed because they're not willing to show their financials to somebody who will actually look into them but don't worry they're gonna list somewhere else where there's no such regulation. Which is hong kong. Which is pretty much dominated and owned by china at this point. So imagine that how in what world forget how in what world does this make sense to you to say.

Well you know i feel good about this company you know it's it's not allowing anybody to review that there's no accounting fraud. There. But i feel good because they can find elsewhere where it's not going to be enforced is this bizarre world what's going on i mean come on now look at this we also believe that the recent statements by. Politburo which suggests that the china could miss its 55.
Gdp growth target could have unsettled some investors now mind you that you know it's a known thing in the industry. The gdp numbers out of china are primarily based on their property market. Which is pretty much a ponzi scheme. There's no two ways about it the greater full theory makes it look like like it's a complete like operation.

There's apartments in ghost cities. That basically gets sold for more and more profit. And this bubble is basically driving this whole gdp numbers up so the whole chinese gdp numbers from the get go don't make no sense that's assuming even if they are reporting. It correctly.

Which is a questionable assumption to make about chinese reporting. So basically they're saying yeah um. You know this could have unsettled some investors. My guy.

I mean. That's a deal breaker for any normal investor in my opinion. But hey what do i know i'm just a layman layman tom of course this is not financial advice just a lame in my opinion might be an accurate might be wrong might be rambling of amendments as always don't click nothing. There's much nothing don't buy nothing let's keep going so notwithstanding.

We believe it sets up baba. Very well heading to its upcoming q1 card. On august 4th. How does this in what world.

Everything you just said about this company sets it up well in any kind of objective parameter. I just don't understand therefore we revise the rating from hall to buy so basically these are about to get delisted and gdp is slowing down china assuming it's even correct and they're saying well it makes us more bullish. This is just insane. This is crazy.

I don't know if you want to read this whole thing. Oh. My goodness in our june downgrade. We caution investors that we noted significant selling pressure at this critical resistance zone 125.

Just to kind of clarify this we're at like 89 right now. So yeah. The resistance has fallen and urged them to avoid adding at those levels despite the sharp recovery from its main lows. We're concerned that the market could use the bullet sentiment yeah.

It's more of a trading stuff. I don't understand trading bro. I i i invest i don't trade so my go up might go down short term you might make a lot of money trading the stock or shorting it or trading it whatever i don't do this i don't say nothing about it. It's not my cup of tea not my wheelhouse at all so basically they're talking more about the gdp being overblown that you i don't think the gdp thing with china being overblown.

That's a major issue. But it's a whole different discussion. Um. Yeah okay so this is interesting um city's latest commentary was favorable of the move by alibaba to seek a primary listing in hong kong.
We viewed the move as a positive given the continued overhang of on adrs from the threat of the listing well they're it's so freaking crazy that they this entire paragraph is just basically regurgitated uh as as being spewed by the chinese government with almost no mention of the fact that the listing is not coming because of uh people hating china or adrs is because these chinese companies will not allow the pcaob to actually review their financials like any other company. The us actually has to do so not a lot of shocks. There investors could be concerned with the downbeat q1 earnings. Whatever is baba stock.

A buy seller hold. Yeah. That's a that's the bottom line. Here.

So basically. They're saying. So yeah crazy crazy crazy crazy look okay they're saying it should not go below 73. Who knows at this point.

I don't know and it's actually none of my business. I don't care about short term trading. But let's talk about alibaba here for a second let's real talk. Okay real talk.

Why do people who own alibaba. Enjoy inflicting themselves with wounds and self pain and horror. You're literally investing in a stock. That is constantly hanging on the edge of the freaking cliff trying to hold on why would you do it to yourself.

Well there's so many other options. I mean come on not to mention the fact we talked about in a separate video the demographic crisis. We talk about the real estate market we talk about all this what if china actually goes to war with. Taiwan what's going to happen with us.

Sanctions you saw what happened to russia i mean there's so many risks here. It's basically a communist totalitarian regime. Centralistic government that is sponsoring ip theft from western companies for years and years and years. And even charlie munger.

Who was super bullish on it i think sold half a stock if i believe correctly. It's not a bad company alibaba in itself. But it's in china. Which means.

It has to deal with all this which means for me. It's uninvestable. I mean. This is a country that literally imprisoned jam jack ma.

Went at 10 cent. Destroyed. Dd global for reasons. I mean we don't even understand half the they do sometimes it's just crazy.

It's a whim of some weird politician and you got to take it it's worse than crypto people that give me for saying. I don't like physical wallets and i like to keep my crypto on the place where i can recover my password so not your you know not your key not your bitcoin. My guy if you invest in china first of all investing in the vie not in china. But that's a whole different story.

Let's say invest in china. It's not your stock. It's a chinese government they can do it whatever they want so for me. This is a weird article.
I don't understand the point of this. I would just you know reiterate my own opinion check for yourself. The logic. Right if somebody's coming up to it saying.

Hey just give me show me your license. A couple's over right the car like show me your license. Just show me your license. That's it and you can go or if you don't show me your license.

Then it means. I don't have you like as in my column of people who i checked today and they have a license that means that if i can't see it i can't verify it you have to go to jail tonight and potentially to court and get into serious trouble so just show me the freaking thing for a second and drive off. I don't want to do this. And then the guy says no i'm not going to show.

It's my constitutional right not to show you okay. That's the kind of thing that we have here so it's either china is super like morally um uncompromisable that they will not allow westerners to look at their financials or option number two which is there's a lot of shenanigans in those financials. They don't want the western world to see whatever it is comment below let me know see you next video.

By Stock Chat

where the coffee is hot and so is the chat

34 thoughts on “The sec just ended chinese stocks”
  1. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jon Watts says:

    What about NIO, BYDDY, and other EV’S companies?

  2. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Cherry Sist says:

    Just taking investors money to set up there businesses . Then leave them potless

  3. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars d c says:

    I think this is a great situation! I know that sounds harsh but you can’t truly audit ccp companies, you can’t own what your invested in them.

  4. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Roberto Loya says:

    “Lafufuing “

  5. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars FreddieBob says:

    Lol

  6. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Thomas Gaudette says:

    Even if a Chinese company is properly audited, there is still exposure to their 1st and 2nd level suppliers and their in county customers who are likely not audited.

  7. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Mc Knight says:

    I was just thinking about this when the hell is SEC gonna do there job already, get rid of these Ponzi Chinese stocks already if there not going by the rules. China's GDP is pure BS, I look at there per capita since its the only data(accurate) to go off on and it shows Taiwan is richer then them.

  8. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Stylinjess says:

    But Bank Examiners will verify!!!

  9. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars UpSpinCreek says:

    I wonder who and how much Seeking Alpha was paid to pump BABA in order to give themselves time to unwind their investment in Alibaba?

  10. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars No Nonsense says:

    Yes, Anderson topic

  11. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jesus Rivera says:

    there are so many US companies with cooked books, why are they only going after foreign companies why not domestic as well ?

  12. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars K REAL [yes it is] BETA 創造的な says:

    Xi Jingping: “This does not spark Stonks.”

  13. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Peter Klausner says:

    This video is not telling the whole story.. There is a 2009 Chinese law that prohibits foreign regulators access to Chinese companies books. So nothing to do with the willingness to provide additional accounting compliance to satisfy the PCAOB… It has to do with both breaking the Chinese law that prohibits it.. So, To allow Chinese companies to list in the first place in NY without regular accounting compliance that all other countries & jurisdictions require… Than why now?? It's like Oh yeah, we totally missed something for like 20yrs!!! LoL 🤣😂

  14. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Peter Dixon says:

    Tesla has a fair amt of China exposure and is further doubling down there.

  15. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars TIEN LE says:

    Does charlie munger still have them?

  16. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars knee slapper says:

    Smartest guys in the room. Ya Tom. A vid on Arther Anderson would be interesting

  17. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Lip Gloss Laxative says:

    I learned my lesson the hard way. No more Chinese stocks.

  18. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Doug Morgan says:

    BABA has fallen so far on every kind of bad news that i agree this is probably a perfect entry point. I'm going to monitor for continued slide then go ALL IN on any signs of a reversal. This is a perfect low risk high reward scenario IMO….

  19. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Danny Poon says:

    Not the delisting fears . This is a MUST for delisting! 😅😅😅
    Baba did a lot to facilitate China CCP in propaganda in US and to help its spies stealing business intelligence. The US government firmly intends to remove this threat! Next will be TikTok.
    This is good as lots of US investors lost a lot in this stock! Many Idiot KOLs still recommend to buy at low early this year. Bad!

  20. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Paul M says:

    Never buy Chinese stocks

  21. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars theshinku says:

    I feel China is trying to globalize the world using Alibaba's well established platform. Not that we are complaining, its product prices are cheap.

  22. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars J . P Goodwin says:

    DW (German Public TV ) recently did a program on the Big 4 and the history . It is not just auditing they sell to their clients, there is a large amount of very profitable other services they "SELL" them, so they have a very large vested interest in keeping their customer happy or lose all that business to a competitor

  23. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Thomas Devine says:

    This must be the ultimate pump and dump. Hey guys Warren is looking to bail and we need you, the greater fool, to step up and buy.

  24. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Will NZ 80 says:

    BABA holders and XRP holders are similar – refuse to believe they may well be wrong so they watch on the sidelines while we all make money 🤣

  25. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Brian Borkowski says:

    Since American investors don't own chinese stocks when they buy Nio or Alibaba but actually a bullshit worthless VIE, they will lose their entire investment if, for example, Nio or Alibaba delists from US exchange and lists on Hong Kong. Yes, Chinese investors will be made whole by Chinese govt but not dumb American investors. Does Kathy Wood still own chinese stocks?

  26. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Lurking Lark says:

    The CCP will “lose face” if they allow the review. It’s weird but by showing the books they think they are “losing” to USA. That’s how China work, and a reason why the CCP is “never wrong”

  27. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Brian Borkowski says:

    When will the SEC 3 year time limit delisting occur?

  28. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Reynaldo Ruiz says:

    Tom, you really need to post that video about not owning Chinese Companies when you buy their stocks, but instead you're buying holding companies. In fact, holding companies within holding companies. It really needs to be posted as a new video or maybe make a new video.

  29. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jeffery Danger says:

    No lafufuing was that a jab. Hah he lafufed it. However strong man says it

  30. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Reynaldo Ruiz says:

    I think people are missing the point in Tom's video. It's not the specifics of the auditing processes. See minute 12.54. Its that they either have something to hide or that they're so morally uncompromisable not to allow westerners to look at their financials. I got out of Chinese Stocks when I bought one company and decided to go to their investors page to look at their financial portfolio and it took me to a holding company in the Cayman Islands. This was in 2017 and the hole got deeper the more I tried to investigate. I got the idea to buy the company from Seeking Alpha. So be careful with these articles from Seeking Alpha. You don't know who's paying them to write these articles or what their true motivation is for writing them.

  31. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jimmy Chai says:

    I agree that Chinese companies should play by US rules. I do think it’s ignorant to think it’s always the Chinese companies that aren’t willing to provide information. They are restricted by the Chinese government to provide such info. That’s why the talks are between Chinese and US agencies about this issue versus SEC dealing with each company directly. It’s also pretty irresponsible to try to portray all Chinese companies as lying about their financials just because the Chinese government may engineer their GDP. And before we get all righteous as Americans, we should look at how we engineered a lower inflation number than the real inflation numbers or the many public companies that engineer their financials to pump up their stock prices.

  32. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars zenmemo says:

    Agreed. You know even people like Charlie Munger are wrong about investing in BABA.

  33. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Pipes says:

    Well with such a bullish report obviously they’re on their way to a government consultation position 🤦‍♂️

  34. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Bon Bonjovi says:

    sounds like the writer is trying to empty there bags.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.