A couple days ago Microsoft announced they will be acquiring video game maker Activision Blizzard in a massive $69 billion deal, making it the largest acquisition of any video game company ever. It appears Microsoft is trying to get more exclusive content for Xbox and PC, which could eventually enable them to become a monopoly. In this video we look at why Microsoft is doing this and whether or not the deal is anti competitive.
Email us: Wallstreetmillennial @gmail.com
Check out our new website: Wallstreetmillennial.com
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/WallStreetMillennial?fan_landing=true
#Wallstreetmillennial #Microsoft #Activision
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Buddha by Kontekst https://soundcloud.com/kontekstmusic
Creative Commons — Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported — CC BY-SA 3.0
Free Download / Stream: http://bit.ly/2Pe7mBN
Music promoted by Audio Library https://youtu.be/b6jK2t3lcRs
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

What's up guys and welcome back to wall street millennial on this channel, we cover everything related to stocks and investing over the past few years. The dominance of the mega cab technology companies in the american economy has become a major subject of public policy debate. In the summer of 2020, the congressional anti-trust committee brought the ceos of amazon, facebook apple and google to a hearing where they grilled them about their monopolistic practices. Noticeably absent from the hearing was microsoft.

Ceo satya nadella, most of the anti-big tech sentiment, has been focused against amazon, facebook and, to a lesser extent, google and apple microsoft has been ignored for the most part, despite it being the second largest company in the world, with a market cap in excess of two Trillion dollars, despite their relatively low profile, microsoft, has been quietly building what could be the largest video game monopoly in history. On tuesday january 18th, microsoft announced its plans to acquire the video game giant activision blizzard for 69 billion dollars, making it the largest acquisition of a technology company in history. On the news shares of xbox's largest competitor of sony lost more than 10 of their value. It appears that microsoft is trying to consolidate the industry and turn their subscription game pass platform into the netflix of video games.

Game pass currently has 25 million paying subscribers, and this number is growing every day. Microsoft already owns valuable video game franchises, including halo, which is exclusively available on the xbox and pc with the activision acquisition. They will control even more valuable franchises, including call of duty. Microsoft has 130 billion dollars of cash sitting on their balance sheet.

They'll be able to do this activision deal without even needing to draw on their credit lines, given how dominant xbox will be after this acquisition, they could potentially have the power to crush their competitors and become a near monopoly in this video. We'll take a look at why microsoft is buying activision and what it means for the 3 billion global gamers. Microsoft is a massive company with its main products being azure cloud computing windows, the office 365 suite some computer hardware and its xbox gaming unit, which is a topic for today's video microsoft's gaming unit, made 15 billion dollars of revenue last year or about nine percent of The total company's revenue with the addition of activision blizzard this will increase to almost 15 percent of total revenue. So it's clearly an area of strategic focus for the company.

For more than a decade, the video game console industry has been a duopoly between microsoft's xbox and the sony. Playstation nintendo is also a big player, but they target a different demographic, so they aren't really a direct competitor for years. Playstation has outsold xbox in the latest. Console cycle the playstation 5 took 65 percent of market share to xbox's 35.
Over the past few years, microsoft has embarked on an aggressive strategy to close the gap with sony, and the activision acquisition is a culmination of this strategy. The strategy revolves around two pillars: their game pass subscription service and video game exclusivity first launch in 2017. Game pass is a 10 per month subscription service which allows unlimited, download and play of a rotating catalog of xbox games. Today they have 25 million game pass subscribers.

Bringing in roughly 3 billion of annual revenue they're trying to position themselves as the netflix of video games, netflix was able to become the dominant streaming platform because of their tens of billions of dollars of investment in original exclusive content. Microsoft is pursuing the same strategy. One of the biggest things that xbox has going for it is its exclusive access to the halo franchise which they own and produce, but if they want to become the netflix of video games, they're going to need a lot more exclusive titles. In march of 2021, microsoft bought video game developer bethesda for 7.5 billion dollars.

Bethesda is the company behind fallout, elder scrolls, doom and other popular franchises. Bethesda makes a few games which are exclusive to playstation, including death, loop and ghostwire tokyo. Microsoft said that they will not make changes to these existing arrangements, but it's a pretty safe bet that bethesda will not be making any new playstation exclusive games and, in fact, microsoft. Gaming, ceo phil spencer, confirmed that some of the new bethesda games will be xbox and pc exclusive over time.

Microsoft plans to build a larger and larger catalog of exclusive games in order to take market share from playstation. This is where the recently announced 69 billion acquisition of activision blizzard comes in activision is a studio behind the massively popular call of duty. Franchise call of duty has been the best selling us console game for eight out of the past 10 years, only losing out to red dead redemption in 2018 and grand theft auto 5 in 2013.. In fact, in 2021 call of duty took both the number one and number two spot in the u.s for the year 2021, with their vanguard and black ops, cold war titles respectively.

If they successfully complete this acquisition, microsoft will own both call of duty and halo, which are the two most successful and iconic console gaming franchises in the market. Today, if microsoft were to make call duty exclusive to xbox and pc, it would mean game over for sony. If this happened, you wouldn't be able to play call of duty or halo on the playstation, which would give you a strong incentive to buy an xbox instead fears around. This is probably why shares of sony tumbled.

10 on the news, an outright exclusivity of call of duty is highly unlikely. It would be an open invitation for the federal trade commission to open up an anti-trust investigation. It's more likely that microsoft will gradually make more and more of its internally developed games exclusive to the xbox they'll, probably start off with new titles that are not yet established, as this will get the least scrutiny from the regulators it looks like microsoft is playing the Long game they're buying up all these game studios, not just for the games they have now, but the new tiles that they'll make in the future. If microsoft ends up owning so many major game studios, it becomes more and more likely that the next halo or the next call of duty will be developed by them and they'll be able to make it an xbox exclusive.
Now the question is whether the government will allow the deal to go through before the deal was announced. Activision's share price was around 65 dollars. Microsoft is buying them for 95. A share at the current share price of 82 dollars.

There's about 21 downside. If the deal is scrapped and 16 upside, if the deal is successfully closed, that means the stock market is pricing in a roughly 57 chance of the deal going through. So it's better than a coin flip, but not by much, but given the obvious potential for microsoft to build a monopoly. Is this probability reasonable? Even if khan does sue microsoft to block the deal? Microsoft can challenge this in court.

This acquisition is strikingly similar to the merger of at t and time warner in 2018 time warner is a media company which supplies shows to direct tv, which was owned by atnt federal regulators feared that at t could give directv preferential access to time warner's content, which Would give it an unfair advantage over other television producers, such as dish the regulator sued to stop the merger? But after two years in court a judge ultimately ruled that the deal would not violate anti-trust laws when the acquirer and the target are not direct competitors with each other. It is very difficult to prove that they will harm consumers. It is highly unlikely that microsoft will raise the prices of any activision games. In fact, they will likely add them to the xbox game pass which effectively makes them far cheaper to access.

The long-term anti-competitive risk is that xbox will eventually build such an insurmountable lead over playstation in the future. They'll eventually become a de facto monopoly and be able to charge exorbitant prices for xbox game pass to be clear, we're still a long way off from this happening. Playstation is still far more popular than xbox in many key european and asian markets. It will take many years before microsoft's master plan to overtake sony will come to fruition.

Another thing that may play to microsoft's favor is the fact that sony is a japanese company. If regulators try to block the deal, they risk the perception of stifling american innovation to protect a foreign competitor. Because of these factors, investors appear to think the deal is more likely than not to go through with all that being said, policymakers shouldn't overlook the massive concentration of power that microsoft will achieve by owning both call of duty and halo. While it could be good for xbox game pass subscribers in the short run, it could be laying the groundwork for a massive video game monopoly that will eventually stifle innovation from their competitors and hurt consumers in the long run.
Alright guys that wraps up for this video, what do you think about the microsoft activision acquisition? Should it be allowed to happen? Let us know in the comments section below, as always. Thank you so much for watching and we'll see you in the next one wall, street millennial, signing out.

By Stock Chat

where the coffee is hot and so is the chat

26 thoughts on “Microsoft is quietly building a video game monopoly”
  1. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Pete OneOfThePetes says:

    We will see what we will see.

    Microsoft are picking off all the publishers that I've refused to even purchase games from…. Only EA left.

    What Microsoft does to improve them is yet to be seen.

  2. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Bruno Foca says:

    You already can't play Halo on the Playstation still Sony beaten Microsoft in the last generation by a huge margin, and have a almost 50% lead in this generation.
    Sony is 50% of the revenue of Activision, Xbox and PC the rest.
    You saying that losing COD is game over for Sony is laughable. Nintendo don't have COD and was number 3 before the acquisition. Microsoft had US$100.000.000.000+, Sony have US$40.000.000.000 in cash and the backing of the Japanese keiretsu system specifically the Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Group.

    Microsoft + Activision is still smaller than Sony, don't forget that this is with Activision revenues from Sony.

  3. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars S P says:

    Considering that Nintendo and Sony both own powerful IP’s, Microsoft having a few good ones of their own doesn’t bother me too much.

  4. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Mo Karney says:

    Microsoft is a multi-trillion dollar company. Sony is a $150B company… Sony can’t acquire a $69B company like Activision.

  5. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars S N says:

    Sorry, I wasn't really paying attention. Was Nintendo even mentioned in this video?

  6. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Ieago says:

    Microsoft has never once been quiet about its anticompetitive and anti-consumer aspirations and efforts.

  7. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars John Shepard says:

    If you can’t win the console war, starve the competition of ip’s

    Yes cod isn’t what it used to be but to say it doesn’t pull consistent sales yearly is a lie. I see sony having to create their own exclusive ips and create a game pass as well.

  8. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Vanishing Act - says:

    Microsoft has one huge advantage, that advantage is that it releases games to both Xbox and PCs. Even if they do cut Sony off from COD its going to be hard to argue its a Monopoly, they don't own manufacture or distribute Personal Computers around the world.

  9. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jeff Kadlec says:

    I say let it happen. There are plenty of game developers out there. Plus, Microsoft is going to do what it does to ANY COMPANY that is not its core business: buy it, ruin it, sell it at a loss later. That's the Microsoft MO.

  10. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Lez 0 says:

    Halo in the top2 most iconic franchises? LOOOOOL, Mario, Zelda, Pokemon, God of War, Insomniac's Spiderman sell way way way way more than Halo

  11. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Superwip says:

    I'm not sure if most policy makers even know that halo exists…

  12. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Ryfael says:

    "You wouldn't be able to play Halo on the PlayStation" Yeah, that's already the case. Please get a writer or editor. Any more of these errors and I'm unsubscribing.

  13. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jake LaMotta says:

    Lmao. Not well researched but enough for your community. But still entertaining

  14. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Extremely Handsome Genius. says:

    $130b CASH. That’s insane enough without even a brief consider of the valuation of the company’s assets.
    Holy tits.

  15. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Marcial Abrahantes says:

    I can't imagine Congress folks will ever even utter "can't let Microsoft own call of duty due to Monopoly concerns" ever. Like, fallout levels of ever

  16. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars yuehuang says:

    Microsoft Gaming is a platform company, comparable to Disney+. Them owning a few IP to promote a Game Pass is a good idea. AFAIK, there is no plans to block game development on Windows or Consoles.

  17. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars sunnycorax says:

    I think it is a bit hyperbolic to suggest this deal means game over for Sony. I think it should be noted that all three of the major video game companies, Sony, Nintendo, and Microsoft, all run on different models of targeting their core demographics. Also while it is very likely that Microsoft will use Bethesda and Activision-Blizzard to create new exclusive IPs, Microsoft has never been a company to make exclusivity at the cost of profits. Take Microsoft Office for instance. By any measure it is the most well known and used suite of office programs, yet when given the opportunity to extend its reach to Apple it took it. There are just some computer users that were never going to jump to Windows and by extending to Apple it increased its market share. Creating content for game pass is important, but I'd think if a game became popular enough Microsoft wouldn't be hesitant to extended it to multi platform. Same goes for its acquired titles. There is no way any of those current franchises are going exclusive. It just doesn't make good business sense. If anything Microsoft has proven that you don't really need exclusive titles in this day and age to sell a console, just good games. Aside from Halo what well known titles are exclusive to the Xbox? Microsoft has lived in the world of PC gaming mostly where nothing is exclusive to the Windows experience beyond what developers program for. All this purchase does is insure future quality content for Game Pass to make it a more dominant brand.

  18. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Michael Johnson says:

    LOLOLOLOL 😄 LOLOLOLOL
    I STOPPED BUYING CONSOLE IN 2004
    I DON'T REQUIRE A NEW GAME FIX EVERY 10 YEARS
    I PLAY DUNGEONS AND DRAGONS PAPER AND PEN GAMING
    & I WIN 🏆 😎

  19. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars TheWanderer says:

    Quietly? they just executed the biggest tech acquisition in history. that's pretty loud.

  20. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Ishaan Khandelwal says:

    Microsoft is walking on a very thin line where one wrong move can bring tons of investigations and regulations.

  21. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars FBI Secret Agent says:

    Am I the only one who think this deal might be blocked by the government.

  22. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Eric Tay says:

    As a PC gamer, I'm happy this is happening. It is getting extremely expensive to make a AAA game, especially ones with open-world like Fallout, GTA, Elderscroll. Game studio burn through their cash very quickly so they need the big boys to come with with cash injection as exclusivity deals or direct buyout.

    MS has a BAD rep managing game studios. The studios making Fable & Mechwarrior, etc. You can watch their failures in the XBox documentary. But with Phil Spenser at the helm, there's hope.

    I am looking forward to Elder Scroll and Diablo sequels.

  23. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars kenii28 says:

    Microsoft is working with Gamestop to create the future of gaming. Power to the players and creators. Nft marketplace

  24. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Clown World Citizen says:

    What Microsoft purchased was a bunch of well known IPs but the thing is in gaming, a well known IP can be destroyed almost over night if the game developers make bad games with those IPs. Also with the advances in gaming tech, many game developers can start new companies and create new IPs which can dominate the market in the future. Microsoft has to make sure that they treat their new IPs like gold or else they will fail.

  25. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Bryan Killeen says:

    It’s bad for gamers it’s good if you own Microsoft.. I hope the government blocks it.. Microsoft is horrible

  26. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Mr. Wonderful says:

    I don't understand how things like video games and tv shows can be considered anti-competitive. They are just forms of mass produced art.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.