Mr Fauci Oh boy. He has been the topic of a lot a lot of political attacks and political support. and when people say he's just the person who tried to do the best with the information he had available. On the other hand, you have people like Elon Musk saying prosecute Fauci he lied to Congress and the truth is probably somewhere in the middle.

But today, we've got to look at what the heck is this proximal origin paper that we just got some more insight on from Congress Let's talk about that because it's a little eyebrow raising about what maybe goes on behind the scenes at our government and how potentially the media narratives get rigged in favor of whatever the government wants. And I know I know there are 50 of you already punching your fists in the air, going come on Kevin You didn't already know that? Oh no, I did. But anyway, let me give you a quick little background thank you. So first, it's really important to remember what what gain of function is and how that compares to directed.

Evolution and I'm going to give very Elementary example I'm not a biologist or or whoever would work on this kind of stuff. I'm just going to do my best for you. Okay, so my understanding is if you have a virus that can only infect bats, then it has not the function of infecting humans. Now if you genetically engineer it, you take some you know Snippets of DNA and you insert it into that virus and you're like here, protein fold, some kind of receptacle or whatever that can now land on a human and make them sick.

That would be genetic engineering. Gain a function style research where basically you have genetically made a virus do something that it could not otherwise do. Okay, that's on one hand, gain a function research. On the other hand, there's this thing called directed Evolution And and the theory here is that rather than taking DNA and trying to screw with the stuff, you're basically trying to let nature do that on its own.

But you're doing that in like a rapid and successive manner to kind of get what you want naturally. Quote: Unquote. Naturally. So here's an example.

Let's say you take a naturally occurring coronavirus that only infects monkeys and not humans, and then you infect five monkeys with him. Now which of the monkeys is the sickest, which has the strongest form of the virus. Potentially Okay, take that monkey and make it infect five more. Repeat this experiment a hundred times Now You're left a hundred times down that row with the sickest compounded with the sickest compound with the sickest compounded with the sickest a hundred times.

As an example here. Now you have something that's probably pretty damn hellish and that potentially could be covet 19.. See, that is an example of how Directed Evolution could give you something that's really, really deadly. Uh, that compared to something that was originally benign.

Now let's now. So now you have a little bit of background on sort of the difference of of when data function is talked about and directed Evolution has talked about. Now we got to look at what's going on with this March of 2020 paper and what does it have to do with a paper that just came out three years later in March of 2023.? So this is interesting. So we know that the FBI the Department of Energy and other departments with virologists I Honestly, I don't know why virologists work at the Department of Energy or the FBI I Still haven't figured that out, but there's a reason you have these departments saying yeah, it's looking.

We've got some confidence that uh, Kovid came from a lab, right? the lab leak Theory right? Uh, and this is a concern because the Wuhan Institute of virology, which is known for this type of research. this gain of function directed Evolution style research is described as China's first biohazard a level four research facility. and the paper is very important that we're about to look at because it basically poo-poos The idea that covet came from a lab. Now the paper that K that that basically pooped with the idea is this right here.

This paper is called the proximal Origin of Covet 19. Now what's really interesting about this paper is that this paper ended up getting cited over 2 300 times in different mainstream media articles and videos. Now that's a really big deal because that basically means the government put together this paper and then the media ran with it. And when the media runs with it, they're basically just perpetuating what this paper says without doing any more digging into it.

Right now, that's really important. And so what does this paper say? Well, specifically, it says the following: It is improbable that Covid-19 emerged through laboratory manipulation of Coronaviruses genetic data irrefutably shows that SARS Covid-19 whatever is not derived from any previously used virus backbone. so they're basically trying to poo poo. the idea that this came from a lab, that this likely either came from an animal Source or human to human Transmission In in sort of a you know, a natural way, right, this is the natural transmission argument.

and it even Ends By reiterating, since we observed all Covid a known Coronavirus features including blah blah blah blah as it relates to coronaviruses in nature, we do not believe in any type of laboratory-based scenario. But wait a minute. Remember what I just described about directed Evolution Where you kind of take a natural uh, a Covid and then maybe you infect monkeys a hundred different times Well If you remember high school biology, this coronavirus that you directedly evoluted boy I probably butchered that, but whatever is going to have some genetic markers that are similar to the ones from nature. You've really accelerated that process 100x.

And that's not natural, right? by taking the constant constantly taking the sickest monkey and affecting the next sickest monkey is not natural. Because in nature, it's entirely possible that a stronger form of the virus would just end up dying out in nature naturally because it has some sort of a weakness that wouldn't otherwise be exposed in a laboratory where you could actually preserve a virus that's not supposed to exist anymore. Okay, so you have this paper that the media runs with from March of 2020 promoting that no, no, no, no lab leak Theory Okay, so we have this, but what did we just get? Well, we just got a report from the Congressional subcommittee on the origins of the Coronavirus and in their report in their memo released on Friday What did they say? Well, they said the following: they said that Fauci who knew, uh, the National Institute of Health had contributed funding to the Wuhan Institute of virology. This Congressional report or memo says that the evidence available to the select subcommittee suggests that Fauci prompted the researchers to write the proximal origin paper and the goal was disprove The Lab leak Theory That's not good.

Let me make that really clear what that means. Okay, what that means is uh, our government. Our government knew they funded the Wuhan Institute Uh, to some extent, right? So to some extent our government knew they funded the Wuhan Institute of virology. Okay, Uh, Fauci, uh, was told this and I believe it was around.

Uh, around Jan 27 2020. I don't know exactly which date in the 20s but it was somewhere around here so our government knew this. Then they decided in March of to 2020. let's circulate a brief that disproves the lab League Theory uh and then therefore the the sort of implied conclusion and I'm saying implied here, right? because we're guessing.

But the implied conclusion here is our government would be really embarrassed if they uh, had to take any blame for covet much easier to blame China Kind of interesting right? So what is what is that? The rest of that Congressional junk say well first of all, they say that evidence available to Congress suggests that fauci prompted this paper to disprove any lab League Theory Now notice it's not uh, research to disprove the lab leak Theory It's a paper to disprove the lab leak Theory Now it'd be one thing if it's like hey, look, go to China and see if we can disprove the lab League Theory and if we can't then we can't right? it's a paper. However, to disprove the lab leak Theory Uh, and then over here you have look at this. The goal of the proximal origin paper was to disprove a lab leak Theory Dr Anderson had objectively weighed all the evidence available to him and uh, scientists must make conclusions available by all evidence, whatever. whatever.

A lot of scientists quietly and privately apparently on phone calls stated hey, like, what if it's a lab League Theory But then according to emails, even Dr Anderson stated our main work over the last couple weeks has been focused on trying to disprove any type of lab leak. Theory The email directly contradicts Scripps earlier statement that Dr Anderson objectively weighed all evidence related to covet. Instead, it appears Anderson was given Direction and sought to formulate a paper regardless of the available available evidence that would disprove a lab leak. this is from Congress So then you get a little bit of talk about how, uh, well here's some more quotes here: Uh Dr Farah led the drafting process and made at least one uncredited direct edit to the proximal origin.

Uh, this individual is not credited as having any involvement in proximal origin. However, according to New Evidence he led the drafting process and in fact made several direct edits. Apparently right before publication, emails reveal that Dr Afara Uh was thanked for editing the document. Thank you for shepherding this paper.

Listen to this rumors of bioweapaneering are now circulating in China Dr Faro responds and says confirming that he will be pressuring Nature which is a publication for for science. Uh, and we'll be pressuring Nature to publish this letter. I will push Nature In addition to Leading the drafting publication process. Dr Farah made at least one direct edit to proximal origin and here it is: sorry to micromanage micro edit, but would you be willing to change one sentence from? it is unlikely.

Kovid emerged from uh through laboratory manipulation too. It is improbable that Covet emerged from a Lab Look at this so you have somebody who gets no credits in the writing of proximal origin, yet is making these media directives to make the media basically suck on the the government's You know what to say? Nope, Nope. Lab leak is Not true. Lab leak is Not true.

You could Google this yourself. It pops up. It's the first search result so you can find this yourself. Uh, if you just type into Google this Select Subcommittee on Coronavirus Pandemic Members 3, 5, 20, 23.

it's the first link right there so you can see it yourself. look at it yourself Anyway, thank you so much for being here! I Gotta go to course member live stream stream right now. Goodbye, see you all next time. Bye hey thanks so much for watching and subscribing as well as sharing the videos.

In case you've enjoyed it, make sure to consider getting more perspective via the links. Down Below In Becoming a Millionaire through Real Estate Investing is one of our most popular courses zero to millionaire real estate Investing that is often bundled with the Stocks and Psychology of Money Group or the Do-it-yourself Property Management. and Rental Renovations guide. After that, you can also check out The Elite Hustlers which has its own special exclusive live stream for people looking to make more money as an individual earner or that is as an entrepreneur or as an employee.

And of course, a check out the other programs specifically for agents or YouTube content creators.