Exclusive New Information in Tesla Crash Investigation [Driver's Friend Reveals Key Information]
Okay, so, a few days ago, a person reached out to me claiming to have first-hand knowledge of certain aspects and circumstance revolving around the tesla crash in texas, the alleged autopilot crash. Now i said it for a few days, while i was verifying whether this thing is legit, it seems to be legit. But again this is just my opinion might be wrong, might be inaccurate, might be the ramblings of amendment. You got ta, do your own research, allegedly blah blah mother, effing blah.
Now here's exactly what happened. A person reached out to me claiming to have first-hand knowledge about certain aspects that led to the tesla crash. Now i spoke with him on social media. I don't want to disclose his identity.
I want to respect his privacy, but this is what he told me. According to my source, bill varner, who was victim number one in this unfortunate tragic accident and his friend, who was approximately 10 years older 69 years old bill was 59 years old. They were having dinner at their house at bill's house at approximately 11 30. They split up bill and his friend left for the garage, the wife, bill's wife stayed at home, and the purpose of this at 11, 30 p.m was to show off the new 2019 model s bill just got they got in the car.
They pull out the driveway and literally 500 yards from the driveway they crash into a tree. Now how the hell did this happen? I don't know, but here's the picture that i was shown. This is bill varner's house, on the end of the cul-de-sac right here. This is the driveway right here, and this is the crash site right here.
So essentially, you can see there's literally 500 yards of road separating from the departure to the crash. So essentially, what seemed to have happened here is that the car could not maneuver this left curve and probably because of the high rate of speed according to social media and news outlets and all these stuff. That came out according to these news because of the high rate of speed the car actually kept on going into the trees instead of negotiating the stern left. So it seems like a classic case of a driver being overconfident.
Allegedly, i don't know exactly what happened about the speed of the car and the ability of the car to take that left turn. He seemed to have lost control on that urn and rammed into the trees. Now here's what i also know from the story. I also know that bill varner according to my source, was a guy who really liked fast cars.
According to my source, his previous car was a ferrari 599 gtb, which is pretty much this car. You guys see on the screen right now. As you can see, this is a phenomenal car and the one thing it has in common with tesla those are extremely fast cars. So we know that bill varner, who was the victim in this crash, loved fast cars.
We know they had dinner with the wife and the friend at 11 30. They came out and within 500 yards they were in the trees. Unfortunately, the crash has happened now. Here's what i think at 500 yards of distance. There is no freaking way in hell. Autopilot could have been engaged, here's the thing, even if somehow they managed to somehow trick the autopilot and we're going to talk about the consumer report right now in a second, even though somehow they tricked the system, the system could not have accelerated to about 60 miles Per hour, where this crash actually pretty much happened according to all mainstream media and all the reporting right, it could not have accelerated with an autopilot that fast, not to mention it was physically impossible, because no separate lines existed, not to mention that elon came out and Said that on their servers they have data proving it was not engaged, but this whole thing just now clearly seems to be a guy that unfortunately lost control of his vehicle very late at night, after a dinner with his friend trying to show off his car, allegedly Unfortunate tragic and extremely sad, but this crash has nothing to do with autopilot or full-self driving. It's not even a tesla crash. It's just a crash that happens when people actually go too fast into corners.
That sort of thing just happens every day, unfortunately so media blowing. This out of proportion seems to be kind of out of the place here now. Here's what i think about the consumer reports video. So now, let's talk about the consumer reports video.
Now we have this man literally here nadia common etching, his way out of the freaking seat with weights and the hair korean contraption, some sort of a nonsense with the seatbelt and the weights and some bicycle string. Whatever the hell, that thing is with his hands and legs all over the place. What is this is this the inquisition. I've never seen anybody try that hard to prove a point.
That makes no sense. What did you prove here that you can get the car to drive without you being in the seat? I can do this in my 1985 ladder with a stick. It's not that complicated. So essentially, i do have a question for consumer reports here and it's really an honest question: what the hell are you thinking i mean come on man, that's a classic! Come on man moment.
What is the point of this? What are you trying to prove that you can fool the car into going on its own without being in the front seat? Okay, so you proved this: does it prove that tesla is not as safe as other cars? No does it prove that that accident that happened, unfortunately, texas, could have happened with autopilot. Of course not so this thing doesn't really prove nothing. I can do this demonstration with any car with the freaking. Stick.
I told you earlier: that's not that complicated. If people want to be idiots and do this insanity in their cars, whether it be tesla, lada, bmw, whatever there's nothing essential, you'll ever do ever to prevent this from happening. That's just darwinian. However, i do blame mainstream media for letting this thing spiral completely out of control and into this nonsense mode of people, actually thinking that this is real, come on man now, thank you again for everybody. Who's been supporting channel channel members patreon. Thank you. So much we'll see you guys next video.
I used to think consumer reports was unbiased. No more! I am dropping my subscription.
Bit late I guess but great feed back thank you- since the beginning of time-those who shout first and loudest don’t always win the war- on the other hand the truth and good always will prevail- when all of this has been exposed Tesla will be the beneficiary – great marketing @ no charge
Anyone else concerned about how much data Tesla has stored on servers about its cars and owners. I see no reason why Tesla couldn’t pull video of your cameras no matter where you travel and log every location as well. Interior cameras in M3 and Y. Like Jesus.
To support what you say, my 2019 MS is the same as the one that crashed. On two occasions I almost did not make a turn. Not that I was going super fast (maybe 40-45 mph) but the weight of the car is so much more than other cars I've owned that the inertia from the extra weight when approaching the turn fooled me into thinking the speed was OK….when in fact it wasn't. In my case it was simply a matter of hitting the brakes harder than I had expected I'd need to. I can imagine what would happen at a higher speed, not having the car long enough to know this….plus a few drinks on board.
It's pretty obvious that the driver caused the accident, not Tesla. But it was the unsafe Tesla lithium battery pack that probably killed them (death by incineration). Lawsuit? The judge will allow it.
Let’s wait what the outcome of the official investigation is. There are still several questions. It’s not a “normal” crash of someone driving too fast and losing control. It doesn’t explain why no one was in the driver seat. For those saying one of them climbed to another seat: it’s unlikely. Hitting a tree at high speed will knock you unconscious or even results in immediate death. Curious to find out what happened. Making excuses for Tesla is a bit premature.
Headline should have been: Tragic death could have been avoided if driver had used autopilot
Thank you!!!!! I’m glad to hear that there is still common sense in this world!!!! I’m pretty sure after this actually does get revealed, the same lying news outlets will most likely not report the “truth” and bury any story that shows what really happened. Main stream media has become “legitimized paparazzi”
I think another possible scenario is they got into the right seat impaired. Hit the accelerator with their foot to demonstrate performance and attempted to engage AP which failed
Tom, just for clarity, your diagram references 'feet' although you are speaking in 'yards'.
Even if this was a basic spec model S it would be accelerating 0-60 in 4.4 seconds, even a slight bend could easily cause a loss of control while excellerating like that. This was an acceleration test gone wrong. If they had rigged the as shown in the CR hit piece then it would not have accelerated like that and would also not have engaged due to no lane markings.
Media is saying there was no one in front seat when the crash happened. I’m just wondering how that fits in the story.
It was reported there was no one in the driver’s seat. So what’s the explanation to that? Was someone else driving?
the key questions are how fast wash it going on impact? why did the car immediately catch on fire? will tesla catch on fire every time if you hit head on at a certain speed? why were they not able to get out?
Why is No one talking about the chance that maybe after the crash the doors Jammed with the fire started that leading to the driver Changing seats to try to break the glass while stuck in the fire and maybe that’s why there was no driver found in the seat
You sounded like you're really butt hurt about it. CR's test reveal how you can defeat the driverless logic by using a roll of duct tape and a short rope. You're more than welcome to show us the proof driver assist feature can be defeated with a rope and a roll of duct tape in other cars.
The car crashed because Tesla uses the same autopilot system Elon Musk puts in his Fake SpaceX rockets 🚀
the lengths they go to dis tesla is just …. oh well, standard operating procedure for MSM.
Anyone with half a thought can recognize what BS the MSM has become, the last ~year and half has been perfect show case of that.
This happens many times as Tesla has many issues and bad quality, just do some research on Twitter. Don’t trust this autopilot it’s horrible
I think the driver was not fasten seat belt and bumped to the passenger seat when the car hit curb, then hit the tree.
So, there was no driver in the driver seat when the car hit the tree.
it is possible to drive the car with out sitting in the front seat, but only for a short amount of time before you have to touch the wheel.
Watch Chicken Genius’ latest video… news out of China is the roof stander / brake failure gal is an employee of a NiO supplier… ‘Allegedly’… DYOR… MBTROAM…BMFB!
What's sad is that no one was in the driver's seat. I know the media hears Tesla, and no one in the driver seat, and they immediately jump to FSD being at-fault. However, the truth is far sadder. Teslas are good at keeping people alive in an crash. The driver most likely was trying to escape the car after the wreck and couldn't open his door, then scrambled to try other doors. We shouldn't be mad at FSD, we should be mad at the lack of accessible mechanical latches to open doors.
question is why a 59 years old well educated man accelerated a model S to 60 mph in front of his house? He should be fully aware of where he can do the accelerations like this. Was DUI involved? Why police report didn't disclose this?
And how could he be thrown to the back seat? No seat belt while driving?
It's 500 feet not yards btw Tom. Thanks for the update that would be 500yards = 1500 feet😝
my point being that's surprisingly even less distance the car travelled before this awful event happened.