Today I Want to talk about how the Fed or more specifically The Wider government is Banning Ftds and making Brokers stump up additional ceral for settlement guarantees and how as a result the shorts are begging you to sell. So stay tuned and let's make some money. And now straight in with the key information. So Susan Trenbath tweeted saying the SEC examines and introduces a new rule to prohibit the use of options to fake cover Ftds.

She said: S N Secc 20237 makes me think something is up as it requires the options Clearing Corporation OCC to make additional deposits to clearing fund for settlement guarantees. She said obviously to be clear fake closing Ftds isn't new. The SEC alerted Brokers they'll be examining for it in 2013 and 2 years ago she posted something similar. The SEC has spent 10 years examining for it, but has now introduced a new rule to ban Ftds and to require additional collateral for settlement guarantees.

Susan Thinks the reason why the SEC, the Fed and The Wider government has chosen now to introduce this ruling is because there's some underlying fear: the options dealers Brokers and market makers are heading for tough times. We've seen a massive increase in failures from options exercised from the OCC via Nscc settlement and the NS C wants the OCC to meet the collateral deposits for its members. Basically, one of these market makers, broker dealers or just Brokers is going to go Belly Up and the NC, the SEC, the Fed, and The Wider government want to ensure that when they do go Belly Up it doesn't crush the entire Financial system and therefore they're going to have to be providing actual collateral for any such exercise that could potentially result in an FTD to ensure an FTD doesn't arise. The reason why is because Ncc's total Market-wide Ftds for September 1st to September 14th, 2023 average close to $9 billion per day.

$9 billion per day in Ftds Market wide could cause a massive catastrophic crash. Obviously, we know AMC has been a victim of the fake covering of Ftds when the market makers, broker dealers and Brokers used things like married and divorce puts and Total return swaps to reset their FTD totals. But obviously these fake covers simply just reset the timer and never really close out of those Ftds and therefore that liability and that problem never goes away. And that is why the SEC, the Fed, and The Wider government have introduced this new rule to try and eliminate Ftds once and for all.

the SEC, Fed, and wider government have actually specified in this ruling exact exactly why they've introduced the ruling and why they're scared of what could happen if Ftds continue. AI is the next big thing and it's currently taking over the world. From chat GPT to picture creation, AI is leading the next move forward in technology. If only AI could be used for investing and trading the stock Forex and crypto markets.

Well, Gr Yd World is currently developing the first ever no Download AI trading platform able to use realtime Market insights and data to instantaneously trade the market before a human can make a decision. The Gryd platform will also contain a variety of risk strategies, so you, as an investor, can select a customized approach to match your desired risk tolerance. When investing, the Gryd token will serve as the primary currency for transactions Investments and even earnable rewards within the platform. On top of that, the Smart SM contract for the Gryd token has been audited by solid Proof, revealing no key issues.

so be sure to sign up to the Gr Yd community and their token. pre-sale funding round down in the description below. So it says the existing Accord allows for a scenario in which the NC could choose not to guarantee the settlement of such Securities arising out of transactions AKA not guarantee those Ftds and fake resets. Specifically, the SEC is not obliged to guarantee settlement until its member has met its collateral requirements.

at the NC, If the NCC chooses not to guarantee settlement because they didn't receive that collateral, the OC would engage in an alternate method of settlement outside the NC, But that scenario presents two primary problems based on an analysis of scenarios using historical data where it was assumed the OCC could not settle transactions through the facilities of the NS C. The worst case outcome resulted in extreme liquidity demands of over 300 billion that is absolutely catastrophic. Robin Hood had a $3 billion Margin Call back in January 2021 that they could not meet and needed a majority of that Margin Call to be waved. But now, if a market maker or broker dealer ends up imploding, these Ftds would cause a liability not to the tune of just three billion.

not even $30 billion, but $300 billion. Let's also remember, the Dtcc slush fund or the totaled assets of the Dtcc members only totals around 65 billion. And there for this $300 billion really is an extreme liquidity demand. and it says OCC clearing members by way of their contributions to the OC clearing fund would bear the brunt of that demand.

And furthermore, there's no guarantee that OCC clearing members could even fund the entire amount of any similar real life scenarios. So the NC is basically saying if a broker dealer or Market maker does collapse and these Ftds or fake covers end up imploding, the entire NCC and Dtcc would likely be screwed. And that is why they need to implement this ruling to effectively prohibit the use of options to fake cover Ftds. And as I said, as a result, the shorts are literally begging you or telling you to sell AMC stock.

Now not only is that just a suggestion, but it seems the mainstream Media or these shorts are literally giving you direct Financial advice, telling you when to buy or in this case when to sell. but may actually read deeper into this article and said the entire article has zero substance and demonstrate zero ability to analyze a stock on its fundamentals. Bullet point to in this article: the shorts are saying the company has failed to diversify its Revenue successfully, but May says, what do you think the Beyonce in Taylor Swift revenue is then would you call an additional 2, three, four, or five or even1 billion do of Revenue an unsuccessful diversification It seems whoever wrote this article has absolutely no idea how to analyze a company or how to analyze its revenue streams. and that's obviously because whoever wrote this article is likely either a short seller directly or just in bed with the shorts.

Which again, just proves the shorts are in mega trouble. Not only do they have to tell you and beg you to sell AMC stock, they need to come up with absolute rubbish. Reasons that don't even exist or more specifically, are just Flatout Fce. And interestingly, the mainstream media has also confirmed something we had only guessed at.

but we now know to be true and that's that retailing investors still own the majority of the shares. they've said. continuing a trend that has lasted for the past 2 and 1 half years, AMC's float is still majority owned by retail investors. Now again, this is something we've only guessed at, but they've specifically confirmed with actual numbers that AMC's current ownership structure is dominated by retail investors.

A whopping 91.2% of outstanding shares are held by the general public. So they' said AMC's current ownership breakdown is 91.2% of AMC shares being held by retail investors. Institutions hold just 8.4% with less than 1% owned by a combination of Corporations insiders and state-owned entities. Here is that specific pie chart showing 91.2 4% of all shares or 18099 million shares is held by the general public or retail investors.

And interestingly, the article then goes on to explain why AMC stock really shouldn't be moving. It says High retail ownership can often result in Greater stock price volatility as retail investors often sell shares and buy shares very very quickly. although that hasn't been the case with AMC. Also saying with high retail ownership, institutional investors may be deterred due to liquidity issues because in AMC's case, or in AMC's instance, retail investors haven't been selling shares.

It's basically saying the majority of AMC shares aren't being traded and therefore there's not enough liquidity for institutions to get in and out and therefore the price of AMC really shouldn't be moving if no Shares are being sold, but also saying that AMC is open to Market manipulation risks such as pump and dump schemes and illegal Short Selling practices saying strong Regulatory Agencies can detect and address Market manipulation. However, the effectiveness of regulatory oversight varies by jurisdiction and may not prevent all or any instances of the above manipulation. So this article really goes to show the majority of the float still over 90% of the float is held by retail investors. and D Murphy is also saying that some mainstream media authors do actually promote AMC but it also seems those mainstream media authors are basically being forced to stop writing Mark H A CFA was once a major contributor of investor Place, but they've since stopped paying him or stopped employing him as his last article was written in October of 2022.

He asks why is that and that's because throughout 2021 Mark was very positive about AMC's stock and AMC stock price, saying AMC stock could at least be worth $80 per share pre-split on its own merits, saying that based on AMC's free cash flow which has improved significantly from 2021, AMC should rise to at least $52 per share. And it seems Mark has also been correct as AMC has now already returned to profitability and we will soon be setting record-breaking profit breaking numbers. But guys, be sure to let me know what you think down in the comments below. And as always, guys, be sure to ding that notification Bell because that way you'll be alerted when I upload a new video.

Cheers! Yes!.