Welcome back to the channel everyone today, i want to talk about jim cramer, being scared of citadel and how he's not allowed to criticize citadel or expose their crimes. I also want to give you a professional data. Analyst input into the say, technologies vote count. So stay tuned and let's make some money, but before i dive into the video, i just want to give a massive shout out to the 3600 of you that have currently ding that notification bell, because you guys are always the first to watch a new video as Soon, as it's released so guys be sure to drop a like down below subscribe to the channel and ding that notification bell, if you haven't already so that you don't miss another video.

Just like this one also guys just a quick one before i dive in with the key information, if you didn't already know, i'm currently holding a 600 visa gift card, giveaway, i'm drawing the winner on the 28th of august and to be in with a chance of Winning 600 - all you have to do is become part of the team and join the patreon linked in the description below and now i want to dive straight in with the key information so jim cramer, admitting years ago that you're not allowed to criticize citadel or expose Their crimes welcome to wall street confidential here with me, jim cramer, as always good morning, jim your piece on citadel, very interesting. How conclusion is absolutely great shape? It is, however, i just want to make that point right up top okay, they're in great shape. It's a matter of fact: i want to throw money at them if i were allowed to put money with them. Anybody who's down 35 percent.

The most important thing to do is throw money. So when i see the new york times with stories about it, they're in great shape what why well, because they said 35 percent, they said they're in great shape, but so cinder group said they were in great shape. They're in great shape, see. This is how it works yeah.

This is the way it's played and guys, like me, can't even say anything other than they're in great shape, yeah, because then i don't get in trouble. Yeah right see when you're reporting enough at like citadel. The important thing is not get in trouble. That's why i continue to tell you they're in great shape now, if i told you they're in great shape 50 times, what's the takeaway.

Thank you, yeah they're in great shape. The end see because you can't talk about a citadel, you can't because if you say they're not in great shape uh, he will say prove it. Okay, i've already said we're in great shape and if you say he is in great shape and someone listens to you. Well, that's dangerous too, so these are uh.

These are crises of confidence and um. You know: look there, isn't anyone that i won't take on citadel's in great shape all right. I still don't know if i have a conclusion there really down 35 percent. Who would you rather go with here's a good question? A q, a who'd rather go with a manager, who's up 10 or a guy who's down 35 up 10 percent.

Why unlimited opportunity unlimited opportunity to get involved with a guy who's got big redemption, so everyone's worried about who who says he's got a lot of cash but is also dead. That's the opportunity of a lifetime! Isn't it but jim right now everyone and he's the best, but you forgot he's the best. Can i say one thing: yeah fear when you see down 35 percent, then it's no down 50 70 percent. That conference call was very bullish.

She said things are good and the press picked that up. I am thinking what you're doing is you're standing, you're standing it all on its head. You're saying that good money managers who have done well and preserve capital should get the money, and i am saying i have read the press, clippings and griffin has said. I don't believe that you know down 35, isn't bad.

The opportunities are once in a lifetime. I don't believe that there's any real redemptions i actually have cash. Even though i'm levered fundamentals are sound. All right fundamentals are sam, i'm gon na hold.

You know. Let me give you an example. Just one more thing sure, right now the phillies are leading three to one right over the tampa bay rays. Who would you rather be citadel in the race? Okay or someone who's up? Ten percent in the phillies and the answer is obviously the race right because they could come back.

Um, oh and if you mean, when you put it like that, it's it dawns on you, yeah, who you want to see when you talk sports. I get it. Oh because you know to me, the rays are the opportunity when you're back by 3-1, the odds are really slim that you'll come back. Don't you want to put the money on the raise i'm from philadelphia? Well, i'm just saying i'm just saying when you analogize to another situation, it all becomes very clear and that's why citadel is the greatest all right.

Thank you very much jim cramer. This is wall street confidential only on the street.com tv so guys, unfortunately, as i've been speaking potentially negatively towards citadel, it looks like i might be disappearing at some point in the future, but hopefully not and until then i'll continue bringing you more amc related videos. Speaking of which i also have a professional or professor phd and data analyst's opinion on the save technologies, vote count as a data analyst and amc ape. It was my duty to do my part.

The true value of current shares, including synthetic shares, falls within this range. 1.5 billion shares to 5.5 billion shares with a 99 confidence rate. I extrapolated the number of amc synthetic shares using advanced statistical software based on the recent say, shareholder vote and three indicators sample size, variability in population and confidence level. Assumptions.

63 000 retail investors voted. Importantly. This is not randomized, so it might be biased and we should control for that, as in people with more shares had more tendency to vote and people with less shares tended potentially not to vote because they thought their vote wouldn't count for much. 68 million shares voted for timothy b and 4.1 million retail investors.

Now i think personally, there's likely to be more than 4.1 million retail investors at this point. Yes, many apes could have paper-handed back at the start of june, but i also think there's been many new apes that have been coming on this journey in june and july and now august as well. There are three methods of extrapolation, linear, s-curve and mixed-mode extrapolation. I tried all three and got almost the same result in a perfect world of statistics, assuming all people who logged their shares voted for timothy b's question on dividend.

The total value of number of shares would be 4.42 billion, but we have to control for a few things, not all people who voted voted for timothy b's question on dividends. I personally didn't vote for that, because companies with debt cannot offer a dividend, but i later logged back in again and voted for that question because it was the right thing to do to log my shares. If 10 didn't vote for that question, then the total number of shares would be 4.92 billion if 20 didn't the total number of shares would be 5.53 billion, but it doesn't matter because we assume everyone who logged their shares voted for that question to be conservative. So there is a variability in population and it's not randomized, so we also have to control for that.

Assuming people with more shares had more tendency to cast a vote. So we dilute the number of participants to control for small accounts by 100 and 200. Just to be sure, if we dilute by 100 to control for small account retails, it means instead of 63 000 investors, 126 000 investors, logged 68 million shares and a 200 dilution assumes 189 000 investors logged only the same 68 million shares. Therefore, it keeps the total number of shares that were voted on the same, but massively increases the actual voters.

This therefore forces down the average number of shares per voter instead of 1 100 shares per voter you're, now looking at, say, 300 shares per voter as you've forcibly reduced it by increasing the number of voters. The reason why she's done this is because, obviously at the moment, it's not a randomized sample and therefore people with more shares are more likely to vote so to control that she's, basically just included tons and tons of people that have zero shares or that maybe have Only one share and still counted their vote, so with a 100 dilution. The total shares out there, including synthetics, would be 2.2 billion shares and with 200 dilution. The total shares out there, including synthetics, will be 1.5 billion shares.

The most conservative estimate in the range, as i was curious, to see how a 300 dilution would look like it turns out. Even if we assumed 252 000 retail investors only logged the same 68 million shares, which is very unlikely by any statistical standard. But out of curiosity, we would still have 1.1 billion shares out there, so this puts an end to the discussion on variability in population period checkmate. So therefore, this removes the randomization element of it.

Yes, it's more likely that people with more shares are more likely to vote. Therefore, you can bias it and forcibly reduce the average by including loads and loads of non-voting people or just including loads and loads of people, with only one share. If i wanted to do a 95 confidence interval, which is more common for these types of analysis instead of 99, the true average would lie between 1.8 billion to 4.2 billion. My statistical gut tells me.

Synthetics are three to four times the flow. This is crazy. So therefore, even with a professional or professor phd level, data analyst, it still seems there's a vast number of synthetic shares in the amc flow. Hopefully, we've given adam aaron amc, say technologies and the sec enough evidence to prove that there is indeed synthetic shares with only one percent of apes making up over 10 of the flow.

Clearly, it must be obvious. There are mass amounts of synthetics, hopefully the sec will be able to use this data, perform their own statistical analysis and determine once and for all if they think there are synthetics in the float and force a share recall. Yes, i know that technically only the lenders can be the ones to force that share recall, but i'm sure the sec can also put some pressure on it and make the lenders force the share recall if the sec and the lenders did force a share recall it Would mean that every share that's been lented out and shorted would have to be bought back and returned. This would obviously cause the amc squeeze as it would mean that all shorts have to cover their positions all at the same time.

I also wanted to give you an update on the sheer amount of speaking fees that treasury secretary jeanette yellen has received over the last few years. Somebody's actually put together a change.org petition for her to resign immediately. If you do think that treasury secretary jeanette yellen should resign i'll leave the link in the description to the change.org petition for you to sign, i do think it's very sketchy that she received such large sums for speaking fees in 2019 and 2020, specifically from citadel, citibank And many others as well, i don't think the data of her 2021 speaking fees have yet to be released, but when they are released, i would love to see what kind of speeches she's been giving this year and how she's been paid for them, especially the kind Of remuneration that she's been receiving from citadel, potentially melvin capital and any others that are also currently shorting, amc and gamestop guys be sure to. Let me know down in the comments below what you think about jim cramer, being scared of citadel and the data analyst thoughts on the true number of shares, an issue guys.

I also wanted to announce that instead of partnering with weibull i've now partnered with moomoo, they offer free level 2 data, great charting news, company fundamentals and figures. They offer absolutely everything. So if you do want to buy some shares but haven't yet signed up for a trading platform, be sure to sign up with moomoo, where you can get four free shares worth up to 3 350 dollars linked in the description below also guys, if you're based in The uk be sure to sign up with free trade again linked in the description below to get some free shares and, as always guys, if you enjoyed this video, be sure to check out some of my others. Alternatively, subscribe to the channel and ding that notification bell, because that way, you'll be alerted when i upload a new video cheers.