Here are my thoughts on the proposed Wealth Tax, what this would do for the market, and whether or not this would work as intended. Enjoy! Add me on Instagram: GPStephan
ENDING SOON: Get 2 FREE STOCKS ON WEBULL when you deposit $100 (Valued up to $1850): https://act.webull.com/k/Vowbik9Tm5he/main
JOIN THE WEEKLY MENTORSHIP - https://the-real-estate-agent-academy.teachable.com/p/graham-stephan-mentorship-program/
THE NEW PODCAST: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMSYZVlQmyG8_2MkIKzg0kw
The YouTube Creator Academy:
Learn EXACTLY how to get your first 1000 subscribers on YouTube, rank videos on the front page of searches, grow your following, and turn that into another income source: https://bit.ly/2STxofv $100 OFF WITH CODE 100OFF
My ENTIRE Camera and Recording Equipment:
https://www.amazon.com/shop/grahamstephan?listId=2TNWZ7RP1P1EB
A new proposal was created which would impose an “Ultra-Millionaire Wealth Tax” on all fortunes above $50 million dollars. This is estimated to generate $3 Trillion Dollars worth of tax revenue over the next decade, without affecting the remaining 99.95% of American households who DON’T have $50 million dollars. 
The plan would impose an annual tax of 2% on all net worth above $50 million dollars, and a 3% tax on all net worth above $1 billion dollars. The taxes generated would help fund a strengthened education system, healthcare system, and would be invested back into community infrastructure. In addition to that, they would call for a $100 billion dollar investment to rebuild and strengthen the IRS, a 30% minimum audit rate for high net worth individuals, a 40% “exit tax” on net worth above $50 million for any US Citizen who wants to leave, and new tools to determine the value of assets. 
Now, in terms of the actual WEALTH TAX in question…this is where things get interesting. 
PRACTICALLY…calculating the net worth of the wealthiest people, and then taxing them on it, will be EXTREMELY challenging. Many assets are not publicly traded, like stocks - and determining the AGREED-UPON value of potentially hundreds, thousands, or tens of thousands of individual assets is going to be nearly impossible.
Second, there’s also the worry that the wealthy would begin HIDING their money if such a tax went into effect.
Third, other critics argue that a 3% tax would require investments to GROW beyond a rate of 3%, adjusted for inflation, just to pay for it without losing money…and that’s a tall order.
Fourth, since this would be a tax on NET WORTH - it would become necessary to SELL a portion of those investments, JUST to pay the tax…and, by SELLING those investments, you’d be subjecting yourself to even MORE taxes in the process.
Fifth, IF a wealth tax was implemented, it’s said to have a negative impact on the economy…it would reduce national income, discourage saving and encourage consumption, and lead to more foreign investment. 
Other countries have tried implementing wealth taxes, as well…but, without much success. Since 1995, over 60% of countries who have enabled a wealth tax have now repealed them…and their findings was that it disincentivized risk taking and entrepreneurship, harmed innovation, and impacted long term growth. 
https://taxfoundation.org/wealth-taxes-in-the-oecd/
In all reality though, I’d be surprised if this ever passed, and most likely - nothing is going to happen, so you’re not going to have to worry about your fortune above $50 million dollars. What I DO think will happen, though, is that - MOST LIKELY - we’ll see all tax brackets start to go up over time, ESPECIALLY if you’re earning above $200,000 per year…and I wouldn’t be surprised if Capital Gains tax was eventually increased, and honestly, I’m all for it. 
For business or one-on-one real estate investing/real estate agent consulting inquiries, you can reach me at GrahamStephanBusiness @gmail.com
*Some of the links and other products that appear on this video are from companies which Graham Stephan will earn an affiliate commission or referral bonus. Graham Stephan is part of an affiliate network and receives compensation for sending traffic to partner sites. The content in this video is accurate as of the posting date. Some of the offers mentioned may no longer be available.

What's up, graham it's guys here, so i want to talk about something that i've seen come up a lot lately and that would be a proposed wealth tax. Now, initially, this is not a topic i was planning to address, but because we talk all things, personal finance, investing and building wealth. I felt like this would be an important discussion to have, because taxes will inevitably be a factor in pretty much everything you do. No matter who you are or where you live, unless, of course you live in the cayman islands, in which case okay, fine, maybe it doesn't apply to you, but for nearly everyone else.

I think this is a really important topic to discuss, because this may end up affecting you in one way or another, even if you never reach the threshold from which a wealth tax is collected. Now i want to make it very clear. I am not at a level yet where this is going to impact me. I think it's pretty obvious.

I am not worth 50 million dollars, although the current trajectory, if everything keeps going well and tesla stock, keeps going up, i could reach that level in five to eight years. So i think this is worth addressing from the perspective of someone who this does not impact. Yet, but probably will at some point in the future, but don't worry guys, i'm not going to be like no taxes, guys. Taxes are yucky grab for president 2032, like if you agree, but instead i'll share my own opinion on this and i'll be very objective when it comes to the facts, the studies and the history.

So that way, you not only know the likelihood of this actually happening, but also the most likely outcome of this, which is probably going to be a lot different than what you might think. Although really quick, if you wouldn't mind taxing the like button for the youtube algorithm by making it turn blue, it would help me out tremendously. So thank you guys so much. It really means a lot and with that said, let's begin over at my desk here.

You know what here we go all right, so, as some background no surprise, the pandemic has really magnified the income inequality here in the u.s. As our economy shut down, it was estimated that 40 of low-income workers lost their jobs, while the richest added billions of dollars to their portfolio as their stock values increased. This isn't just a new phenomenon either since the 1970s, the top one tenth of one percent, have continued to concentrate their wealth year after year, while growing their income to record levels. In response to this and the growing divide between the rich and the poor, a new proposal was created which would impose an ultra millionaire wealth tax on all fortunes about 50 million dollars.

The plan would impose an annual tax of two percent on all net worth above 50 million dollars and a three percent tax and all net worth above a billion dollars. This is an amount that they say will help bridge the gap from the ultra wealthy, paying a lower effective tax rate than the bottom 99, which, if you're wondering how that's even possible i'll explain in a moment, because you're capable of doing this too. But on a smaller scale, but anyway i digress. The tax revenue generated would help fund a strengthened education system healthcare system and would be invested back into community infrastructure.
In addition to that, they would call for a hundred billion dollar investment to rebuild and strengthen the irs. A 30 minimum audit rate for high net worth individuals, a 40 exit tax on net worth above 50 million dollars for any us citizen who wants to leave and new tools to determine the value of assets. Basically, what they're just proposing is this once you reach that 50 million threshold, the irs would send out a third-party auditor to look over your financials and add up the value of your assets like stocks, real estate coins, collectibles cars, artwork and so on, and then from There they would determine how much extra tax you would owe now in terms of the small details. They say that they would not include any assets worth less than fifty thousand dollars.

So that way, small nuanced items like refrigerators, furniture and non-psa 10 pokemon cards - are not going to be counted. For the sake of simplicity, however, despite how easy it is just to say, we should just tax all your wealth about 50 million. We need to start asking ourselves: how realistic is this, and is this even possible to do in the first place? Well, i think it's important to mention that historically, taxes were always much much higher than they are today. In fact, if you're making money right now, most likely, there has never been a better time to pay your taxes as weird as that is to say, it's also never been a better time to get your two free stocks down below in the description, because weeble is Going to be giving you two free stocks when you deposit 100 on the platform and those stocks could be worth all the way up to 1 850.

In fact, i got a free stock right here, so let's open this up and see what it's worth and i got ar for almost 10 bucks, but anyway, just consider this. Here's a fun history lesson. For the day in the early 1940s, the top tax brackets were as high as 80 percent on incomes over 2 million a year, but in 1942 right after the attack on pearl harbor, president roosevelt proposed a 100 top tax rate and he said no american citizen ought To have a net income after he has paid his taxes of more than 25 000 a year now, even though a 100 tax rate was never enacted, the revenue act of 1942 raised the top tax rate to an all-time high of 94. The issue implementing this, however, was that so many people began spending their money, so they wouldn't be taxed on it and that led to an overall less tax revenue than anticipated.

Afterwards, of course, taxes began to decline throughout the 1950s. The top effective tax rate was just above 50 percent for the wealthiest people in the 1960s and 70s. It was just about 40 in the 1980s, it was below 40 in the 1990s. It was barely above 30 in the 2000s.
It was just below 20, and now we sit just above 24. That means that throughout any other time in history, most likely you are paying the lowest tax rate in the last century. However, even with all of that said, how is it, then, that billionaires are still managing to pay a lower, effective tax rate than the bottom 50 percent? Well, a lot of this really comes down to how the tax system is designed and, amazingly enough. You could take advantage of this too right now, no matter how much money you make and it all comes down to the simple term of capital gains tax see right now.

The tax system is designed to tax the people, the most who are actively working, meaning if you go to a job and you make a hundred dollars. You're gon na have to pay federal income, tax, state income, tax, social security, tax and medicare tax, and all of that could very well add up to 40 or more, depending on how much you make and where you live. However, when you invest your money that profit you make is not considered active income and therefore you don't owe any payroll tax on it, not to mention. If you keep that investment longer than a year, it's considered long-term capital gains tax, which only has a top tax rate of 20 percent, plus a 3.8 investment sur tax on incomes above 200 000.

That means, if you make less than 40 000 a year and you've held your investment for longer than a year. You're, not gon na have to pay any federal income tax on that profit and even at the top capital gains tax bracket. The person who's making a hundred million dollars a year pays the exact same capital gains tax, as the person is making 250 000 a year. It's just a flat 23.8 percent.

Now, in terms of how the wealthy people generate their money, the majority of that is earned through their investments. As the proposal says, the 99 rely primarily on labor income, while the majority of the one percent rely primarily on their investments. That just means that, when the wealthiest billionaires have all of their net worth tied up in company stock options, when they sell a portion of that long-term ownership they're paying a flat 23.8 percent compared with the employees who are paying tax on their active income. Now the good news is that this tax structure is available for anybody to use and take advantage of, and it was designed like this for a reason.

One long-term investments like this are not indexed to inflation, so you not only have to pay tax on the real return of your money, but also the inflation caused by the federal reserve, and that is why the taxes are lower. The second taxes were already paid on the original money you invested, and so by creating another tax. On top of this, it's said to be double taxation and third, a lower capital gains tax was found to have led to a higher amount of spending which helps our economy. That's because investors were more likely to sell if they pay a lower capital gains tax rate and then that money is dispersed back into the economy, which then helps it grow.
So really beyond a certain threshold. Most ultra wealth is derived from investments and not so much from working a traditional job and given the tax brackets between the two, that is how the top one percent are able to pay a lower, effective tax rate than the bottom 99. Now, in terms of the actual wealth tax in question, here's where things get interesting, practically calculating the net worth of the wealthiest households and then taxing them on that is going to be very challenging. Most assets are not publicly traded like stocks and determining the agreed upon value of potentially hundreds, thousands or even tens of thousands of individual assets is going to be nearly impossible.

Second, there's also the concern that the wealthy would begin hiding their money if such attacks went into effect. The billionaire leon cooperman said that if the wealth tax passes go and buy yourself, some gold, because people are going to rush to find ways of hiding their wealth. Third, other critics argue that a 3 tax would require those investments to grow beyond three percent: adjust it for inflation. Just so those investments don't lose money and that's a tall order.

For example, if you invest a hundred thousand dollars in a treasury bond, that makes three percent, but inflation is three percent you're not making any money at all if a wealth tax of three percent is then enacted beyond that, you would have to make a six percent Return on your investment just to break even adjusted for inflation, the fourth, because this would be a tax on net worth, it might be necessary to sell off some of those investments to pay the tax and by selling those investments to pay a tax. You would be subject to more taxes because you sold a fifth. If a wealth tax is implemented, it's said to have a negative consequence in the economy. It would reduce national income, discourage saving and encourage consumption and lead to more foreign investment at six.

There's also the concern that a wealth tax would be unconstitutional and would face a plethora of legal challenges that would ultimately be decided by the supreme court. Other countries have tried implementing a wealth tax as well, but without much success since 1995. Over 60 percent of the countries who have enacted a wealth tax have now repealed them, and their findings was that it disincentivized risk-taking and entrepreneurship. It harmed innovation and it impacted long-term growth.

So, given the challenges of actually and successfully implementing this, as with the ceo of starbucks, calling it ridiculous here's what you came for - and here are my thoughts - you know - i think, when it comes to this, we have two ways to think about it. Number one would be practically and number two would be fairly. So let's talk about the practical aspects. First, i think it's going to be a logistical nightmare to enforce, and i guarantee it's going to turn into a lengthy legal battle for anyone who disagrees with the valuation of their net worth and what they owe in tax.
In most circumstances, a good tax attorney would argue each and every item and then tie it up in litigation for years before any money is actually collected, not to mention you can't accurately place a value on certain items that don't actively trade hands like rare art and Coins and collectibles and cars, so it would be unusual to impose a two to three percent tax on certain items where the price is really just pulled from thin air. It also becomes very challenging to tax somebody, who's equity, rich, but cash poor like what about a startup founder who has their entire net worth tied up in a billion dollar company, and they have not taken out a single cent for themselves because they reinvest it all Back into the business, in that case, do you force them to sell equity for paper profits that they've yet to realize on a business that might not be successful. I just personally believe that accurately enforcing this on, a large scale is going to be difficult, if not pretty much impossible, and it's gon na be a battle every step of the way, that's just better served elsewhere, not to mention one could argue that the recent increase In stock price is attributed to the federal reserve, inflating the dollar and devaluing the currency, thereby causing everything else to go up so to call that a gain and then tax, it is a bit flawed. The second there's also the issue of income inequality and finding a reasonable way to address that.

I'm a firm believer that the best way to address income inequality isn't so much in taxing as many people as possible, but instead through education. I think financial literacy needs to be taught in schools. College tuitions are way too high and when people get caught up in the cycle of poverty, it's very difficult to break out. I think if we find a way to improve financial literacy across the entire country, we're all gon na be in a better place, but in terms of taxes i don't even have 50 million dollars right now.

So this would not affect me, but i personally believe that this would be the wrong path to take. Instead, i would certainly be a proponent of raising the capital gains tax, even on myself, but to a reasonable level. Studies have actually shown that the optimal capital gains tax rate is really 28. This is the point of maximizing tax revenue without causing people to run for the hills, and i tend to agree with this as well.

Just purely anecdotally, raising the capital gains tax rate like this would increase the tax revenue. It would not be difficult to collect and there wouldn't be any legal challenges to do so. Use that money to reinvest back into education where more people could learn about finances. The importance of saving how to budget and long term just how to make more money.
The issue that i see with taxation being seen as a solution is that it assumes that extra money is going to go towards the people who need it the most and it's not going to be mismanaged like when a person has a spending problem. Very rarely does making more money actually solve the root of that problem. Instead, if you throw more money at the problem that enables that person to continue spending and the cycle repeats itself, think of it a little bit like filling a bucket with a giant hole at the bottom going and filling the bucket up with even more water is Not going to cause it to leak any less and the bucket first needs to be fixed before it could hold more water. I think the same thing applies here with taxation and government spending fix the spending problem first and then tax later is needed in all reality, though, i would be surprised if this ever passed and most likely it's not going to happen and you're not going to have To worry about your fortune above 50 million dollars.

What i do think will happen, though, is that eventually, all the tax brackets will end up going up over time, especially if you're making over 200 000 a year, and i wouldn't be surprised if at some point, the capital gains, tax rate is increased and if it's A little bit i would be all for it. The capital gains tax is absurdly low to be capped at 23.8 percent. Regardless of how much money you make, whether it's 300, 000 or 300 million dollars, maybe for every million dollars you make above 4 million bucks. You have to pay an extra one percent in long-term capital gains tax, or something like that.

I'm just spitballing ideas here. I also think the government needs accountability for their spending and to try to figure out why it's not currently working for what we already have once they find the precise problems. They could better work to create new policies and regulations to fix them. Like smashing the like button for the youtube algorithm, but overall, my final thoughts on the wealth tax is really just this.

It's too complicated. It's not gon na happen and it's not the right solution. Instead, let's address financial literacy. Let's raise the top capital gains tax rates on the wealthiest households and, let's make sure, most importantly, that the tax revenue is properly allocated.

If that could happen, and you get your two free stocks down below in the description, i will be 100 happy. So with that said, you guys thank you so much for watching. I really appreciate it as always make sure to destroy the like button. Subscribe button and notification bell also feel free to add me on instagram posts are pretty much daily, so if you want to be a part of it, there feel free to add me there.
As my second channel. The gram stefan show i post there every single day. I'm not posting here so if you want to see a brand new video from me every single day, make sure to add yourself to that and don't forget to get your two free stocks down below in the description. That's worth all the way up to one thousand.

Eight hundred and fifty dollars so enjoy. Thank you so much for watching and until next time.

By Stock Chat

where the coffee is hot and so is the chat

34 thoughts on “My thoughts on the millionaire tax”
  1. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Zoltan says:

    The problem is not directly about rich versus poor. So putting numbers to “who is rich and should be taxes” is ineffective.

    The real problem is that passive income is TAXED LESS than real work income. So whoever is doing the real work in the economy is paying more taxes… And whoever gets wealth once (by inheriting, being lucky, or actually doing something really well) is just sitting there and automatically becomes more and more rich without any additional effort.
    This is a direct root cause of the GROWING wealth inequality.

    And I would like to emphasize that I have nothing against wealth inequality. But the fact that it is GROWING what worries me. We had rich and poor people 70 years ago when the economy was booming too. But now the gap is way much wider than what is healthy…

  2. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Ivan Fuentes says:

    This is Graham’s longest money play, making it seem that it’s such a burden to raise the taxes on the Uber rich that we shouldn’t even bother.

  3. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jerry Walker says:

    Wealth tax is better than income tax. Flat 2.5% wealth tax across the board is ideal

  4. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Sam Zaremba says:

    Anyone else glad they're poor with a networth of $45M.
    This video was highly relatable 👍

  5. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Crypto Fiend™ says:

    Bitcoin and forex are more profitable with the favorable market rise

  6. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars 王你妹 says:

    Well financial literacy is only practical if the lower income individuals have that extra money for them to manage and invest.

  7. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Emil Sosnin says:

    When I'm asked to press a 'Like' button, I make sure to press the 'Dislike' button. Stop asking, it's redundant.

  8. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Line says:

    Anyone who is rich but doesn't want to pay taxes really need to get their priorities straight. My parents have loads of money and have said they are happy to pay over 50%. They've got more than enough whereas others in the world don't. No one needs billions of dollars to live when others are starving.
    This is not in USA though. Other government actually knows how to spend the money right. Not spend it on crap like a big army.
    Honestly you saying your government sucks and trying to hide your money so you don't pay taxes solve nothing I'm afraid. You need systemic changes where that money can do good for some people.

  9. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars dantae666 says:

    LOL. suck it up bro you are going to be taxed to pay for all this its world wide there is no where to run either

  10. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars spldrong says:

    My first thumbs down ever on one of your videos.
    No more taxes. We are already taxed to death.
    Cutting spending is the only logical and moral answer

  11. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Tasneem Ahmed says:

    I mean taxes don't even go into education or housing they go to the military to terrorize people around the world.

  12. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Shadow WSK says:

    I dont even live in America, why am i watching this

  13. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars FreedomF1ghter77 says:

    I see people comment how inefficient the Government is or putting more money into the Government is like throwing money at a fire pit. How about all of you people do something to your communities/people around you. There is no black or white situation. The Government although not as efficient is doing what it can to help people get out of poverty and grant them funds to prosper(providing employment). Of course there will people who don't really need the money or are parasites and take money from the government. If any of you criticize the government and do nothing, you are just ignoring why the government spends so much in the first place. If you are unwilling to do anything about the places and people nearby then pay more taxes, let the government use that money for the better. If the country was a better place and wasn't as financially fucked (example: everyone in the U.S helping each other out) there wouldn't be higher taxes

  14. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Colleen Jones says:

    Wealthy tax – that is ridiculous. How about full transparency about where our taxes are going. Throwing more money at a problem does not mean it will solve it!

  15. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Chronicling the Tide says:

    Interesting, came here from millineal money broadcast… so capital gains tax increase could happen… what would that do for asset prices? there's a lot of ways the gov can calm down asset inflation without raising rates. Thanks for the video!

  16. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Southern Born Senders says:

    Intro idea: What's up guys, Graham here, if you could, launch a cryptocurrency and name it Graham Stephan, then infiltrate Tesla and then pitch the currency to Mr.Musk so he post about it on Twitter which really would help spread the good word for my channel.

  17. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars bob bob says:

    I think putting a limit on tax write offs or deductions would be a good thing. I think elon musk or bill gates/Jeff bezos should not pay a lower percent in taxes then I do at 25k a year. Yes they can write off things but there should be a cap on deductions and write-offs.

  18. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Matt Collins says:

    Taxation is theft. And Roosevelt was a commie who should have been sent to the gulag.

  19. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars seneca983 says:

    40% exit tax? Wow! Is that on your whole net worth or only on the unrealized untaxed part?

  20. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars James Trader says:

    Taxes at all levels are a percentage. Why does it make sense to demand a HIGHER percentage as more money is made? Doesn't it seem counter intuitive? Seems like to incentivize more money generated and to reduce incentives toward finding ways to offset taxes that a percentage reduction could be granted because more money at the same percentage or even a lower percentage of taxation is more taxes paid and fewer games played.

  21. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Sparky says:

    Yeah, scrap the wealth tax, raise the estate tax. – A friendly tax CPA from Atlanta

  22. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars clubracer6 says:

    💯 on the need for schools is to teach financial literacy! Way more valuable than calculus! Agree with your taxation ideas as well.

  23. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars denzilv says:

    Graham again spitting some reasonable solutions to a problem! Financial literacy being taught in the education system would be a huge benefit. Internet literacy would probably be beneficial too. 🙂

  24. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Johnny Whitfield says:

    Graham 2032 – NO TAXES! Love it!

    Income taxation is serfdom. The government owns the fruits of your labor and decides how much you get to keep.
    Taxing labor hurts the middle class most.

  25. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Anonymous says:

    I fucking hate the fact that Joe Biden wants to raise the capital gains tax to over 50%. It's stupid and I am pretty sure that America is going to see lots of businesses leave because most businesses grow by investing in the stock market.

  26. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Skylar Benson says:

    40% exit tax? So even if you disagree with this and decide you didn't like it, you pretty much can't leave. Shady.

  27. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Anonymous says:

    I got a dishwasher commercial right after he said "basically what they're proposing is this:" 😂

  28. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Robert says:

    I now look back at high school and thank heaven financial literacy and economics were mandatory to graduate life after hs with a budget made for your first year out.

  29. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars OlBlue says:

    What they should actually be talking about is taxing everyone higher

  30. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Paul Mark11th says:

    What's up Graham it's guys here😂
    Am i the only who heard that?😂😂

  31. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Kony Stark says:

    Labor should be taxed less than capital gains.

  32. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Person says:

    More practical concerns. Wealthy people invest in companies that produce things that the market values. Taking some of that money and instead using it to hire more bureaucrats (such as more IRS employees and tax court cases) and incentivizing wealthy people to hire more tax experts – that means more people doing fake work and less people doing real work (and less focus from high achievers in the private market on continuing to lead). Also, Money is just a ledger (it's a way of organizing human behavior). Taxes do not create wealth – they simply add overhead (paperwork) and incentivize people to change behavior. Of course there are trade-offs. For example, maybe some of the money from the taxes could fund jobs in other areas that are useful. Although there's a general concern that the government tends to be less efficient than the market. Another concern – incentivizing people to sell stocks will damage investing markets for everyone else.

  33. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Josh Torchia says:

    Fixing infrastructure is like fixing the hole in the bucket. To learn more, smash the like button.

  34. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Srizzil says:

    Unfortunately while there is no direct income tax in the Cayman Islands 🙌🏼, there are still many other taxes like duties on goods, work permit fees for expats and certain property taxes. Nowhere is 100% tax free on this planet 😂. Although less tax is still amazing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.