Today I Want to talk about how as expected, the mainstream media is saying that Citadel is fine. This comes after their desperate requirement for a $400 million loan, which actually seems to have an even sketchier background. So stay tuned and let's make some money. And now I dive straight in with the key information.

So you'll remember from my video yesterday that Citadel recently took out a $400 million loan and I said I guaranteed you The mainstream media would say that Citadel is doing fine because Jim Kramer said many years back you have to say that Citadel is fine. You have to say that Citadel is great. You have to say that Citadel is okay, otherwise very bad things happen. Jim Kramer Said this in a live interview.

The host asked him what he thought about Citadel being down 30% back in 2008 and he said that Citadel is great, Citadel is fine, Citadel is amazing Citadel is perfect and he said that if he doesn't say those words, bad things happen. And as I said, you guessed it. On the exact same day that Citadel took out this $400 million loan router, just posted this article saying that billionaire Ken Griffin Citadel is planning to give back about $77 billion in profits to investors after a year of double digit returns. Now this part I find really interesting.

Why do they desperately need a $400 million loan? If they've got $7 billion of profits to give out, why not just give out 6.5 billion in profits profs or 6 billion in profits and then surely they'd have all the money they need, right? why would they have to get a $400 million loan elsewhere and be paying over the odds for that loan as well? Don't forget we're in a high interest rate environment and they've got a terrible credit rating of Triple B rated Which if you didn't know, Triple B rated is one step above completely junk debt. Of course, this mainstream media article says that Citadel is fine, Citadel is doing great, and obviously there's absolutely zero mention of the $400 million loan and Bams has done some digging. Finding out something even more interesting saying: Monday Ken Griffin gets a loan for $400 million from Bank of America with literally just above junk rating and then on Tuesday a day later, he pledges the same $400 million to a cancer research facility which was started by The Rockefellers He's saying that Rockefellers own many banks and asking was this a donation or a repayment of some kind saying we know Ken Griffin doesn't care about research facilities because he was sued last year by a research facility for manipulating their share price, saying is this Attx write off or is Ken Griffin living off of loans as we've already seen him sell off part of Citadel As Bigam said, you may remember from last year that Citadel Securities Sasqua, Hana Virtue and other firms were sued by a biotech company that accused them of intentionally depressing its share price. That company was Northwest Biotherapeutics which claimed in a suit that beginning in late 2017 and continuing until August of 2022, the market making firms deliberately engaged in repeated spoofing.

So Ken Griffin is obviously not interested in these biotech companies and actually manipulates them for fun. So what is he doing? donating $400 million to one that he's just borrowed a day earlier? From Bank of America to today, we had another great day in the Millionaire Mindset Trading Group with Cccc running 26% sttk running as well where M Mo locked in 30% some of the others locked in 10 20% gains as well and Es the P locked in over $2,000 on Nvidia options. So guys, be sure to join the Millionaire Mindset Trading Group Linked In the description below where you can choose from a monthly membership or a one-off lifetime payment equal to about 8 months of membership. And also remember there's still that 100% guaranteed refund if you don't make a profitable trade in 30 days.

So be sure to scroll through the website, check out what kind of content and information is shared in the group, and also check out what our members have to say. And he also tweeted about how the shorts are about how these market makers and trading platforms are turning on each other. Flat 10 of the Robin Hood CEO said that Americans are getting ripped off by big Banks that's in reference to many traditional Banks paying little to no interest on savings where Robin Hood advertises their 5% annual interest fee or annual interest rate. But as Bams has said, it's these trading platforms turning on each other to become the next banking system because they desperately need your deposits.

If you look at Robin Hood's financials, they've seen decreas in customers and decreasing trading volume every single quarter since the start of 2021. That was obviously due to the mass EX us away from Robin Hood as a result of what they did to mem stocks. Many people realized if Robin Hood was happy to steal your money and turn off the buy button, why on Earth should you stay with them And now they desperately need more money to keep the Ponzi scheme going after years and years of losses now Lynn Also tweeted something very very interesting which really gave me tons and tons of Hope for AMC and AMC hitting a new all-time high. She tweeted asking a question for Quant in the audience if anyone happens to have quick access to the data.

She asked saying how many stocks have fallen over 75% or over 90% or over 99% and eventually went on to make new all-time highs and on how many stocks does that happened more than once? Are there only that it did it two or three or even four times. As a prime example, Nvidia recovered from two over 75% draw Downs to new all-time highs plus two more 50% plus draw. Downs Too Apple AMD and Netflix have all Fallen 80, 90 95% and continued on to hit new all-time highs. She also found a number of other companies like Seagate technology as a prime example which actually fell 99% but then went on to hit an all-time high twice over and actually the thread keeps on going with more stocks and more stocks and more stocks.

So actually many of the stocks in the market have fallen 75, 90, 95, 99% on bad fundamentals. But then as fundamentals improved and they became profitable, went on to hit all-time highs not just once, but twice and three times again. As I said that to me gives me real confidence that we have not seen the all-time high for AMC I Guess you could say that many of these stocks weren't as manipulated as AMC. But as Tesla has proven good performance beats manipulation every single day.

And that's why these shorts are continuing to try and Sue the SEC in a bid to vacate Short Selling rules. It says here: three hedge fund associations sued the SEC on Tuesday in a bid to remove two new rules aimed at boosting transparency for short sellers. While we know the SEC tends not to go after short Sellers and tends to ignore their crimes, it seems even these rules alone are bad news and big problems for those shorts. Even this increased transparency is enough to infuriate the short sellers into trying to sue the SEC.

That's likely as a result of these short positions actually being disclosed and the entire Market being able to see what these short hedge funds are up to and fight back against them. But guys, be sure to let me know what you think down in the comments below. And as always, guys, be sure to ding that notification Bell because that way you'll be alerted when upload a new video. Cheers!.