Today I Want to talk about exactly how the reverse split cues of change will lead to the AMC squeeze? I Want to talk about what the Q-sip service sprayer has said about Q-sup changes and why shorts are forced to close as a result. I Also want to talk about why Regulators so far have been turning a blind eye to AMC and GameStop so stay tuned and let's make some money. And now I'm going to dive straight in with the key information so we can see that Randall Cornett has tweeted a report saying that name changes and reverse splits lead the Q-sip changes which lead to short squeezes. Now this report and investigation was actually performed all the way back in 2013.

it's not something that's happened recently over the last few months, but it's still very applicable to this very very day. We know from my video the other day the reverse splits have caused previous short squeezes. So today I want to explain how it's going to impact. AMC So the report starts by saying it appears a name change and a reverse split forces the synthetic shorts to be covered and he says the question would accuse of change make the short shares after cover He said it seems from all I've read accused change by reverse split could force the cover of NSS positions or naked and synthetic short positions if the change is done in conjunction with a name change.

He said it's my understanding the mechanics of acusive change with a name change would effectively prevent trading shares of the old Qsip number and would create an entirely new set of shares through the DTC. And he said by doing this, the DTC is forced to account for all of the old shares exchanged for the new shares. Without the name change, the old shares would simply be renamed. With the name change.

they are physically exchanged, which will isolate Phantom shares and force covering now. I Have seen some comments suggesting that a new Q-sip number and a new inventory of shares is still given even if a company doesn't perform a name change anymore. This extract says that Q Sips for Equity Securities will no longer change for an entity name change. However, a new Qsip number will continue to be assigned and a new inventory of shares will continue to be assigned for reverse stocks splits.

I Couldn't actually find a day as to when this change took place. I'm guessing sometime after 2013, but it seems that we don't anymore need a specific name change. The Q set number still changes after a reverse stock split and a new inventory of shares is issued by the transfer agent to these brokerages. At this point, I Believe the broker or brokers who sold the Phantom shares would be responsible for making good on a transaction and closing out of those synthetic.

Shores Perhaps the broker would force a squeeze in a new Q-sip shares in order to cover the price. Again, would spike as the brokers who were guilty of selling counterfeits made good through the new market. The Qsip Service spray rep stated that accusip number change usually comes with a name change, but not always. He stated that a name change will always come with a Q-sip change, though he told me that the name change and the Q-sip number change starts with the company's transfer agent AK Computer Share coordinating electronically with the Q-sip service Brayu by linking the company's name and address.

Then the Qsip Service Pro coordinates with the DTC or depository Trust Company and offer the company and transfer agent AK Computer Share and AMC receives their new Qsip number from the Q-sip service. pro. The company and transfer agent and legal team then coordinate with the NASDAQ and the SEC for the already coordinated amount of shares as the new inventory. The company and transfer agent will then coordinate with the DTC to confirm the amount of new shares and other key information and after accountability is confirmed by the DTC.

The DTC then authorizes The Brokerage companies to change all of the old Qsip numbers to the new Q-sip numbers electronically within our brokerage accounts. Now, these brokerage firms just can't change the old cuset number into the new cuset number. They actually have to get rid of the old Q sub shares as they're given the new shares by the transfer agent or by computer share. That means these Brokers will have to get rid of 500 million or a 2 billion or 5 billion or 10 billion AMC shares and will only be given 500 million new AMC shares.

or I Guess Specifically, after the conversion reverse split, they will only be given 150 million new shares. Therefore, they have to get rid of all of the old synthetically created shares. and the brokerage firms of the market makers and hedge funds have to close out of these synthetic short positions. And obviously, that way the transfer agent is only going to be handing out 500 million new shares or 1.5 billion.

And then after the reverse split 150 million shares after the cusive changes. When in fact, there's probably many, many millions, if not hundreds of millions or billions of more at these brokerage firms. And therefore, we're not having these brokerage companies changing their old shares into new shares and no real movement of shares is taking place. We're actually having the transfer agent hand out a new inventory of shares in the new Qsip number ticker, and therefore the market makers will be required to account for each of the old shares with the new shares, and they'd be forced to match a new inventory of shares with those old, previously existing shares.

Now I Think this really explains how abusive change does lead to a short squeeze, because it's not just these brokerage firms changing the old shares into the new shares, there's actually an entirely new inventory of shares actually issued. Instead of just changing 150 million shares of Qsip A into Qsip. B They actually get rid of the original old shares because they're given new shares to replace them now. Something interesting.

I Also found was this conversation with the Qsip Service Pro obviously happened back in 2013 and therefore David vs Goliath actually contacted the Q-sip Service bro right now in 2022 to see if you could get the same same response. An Accusip Service sprayer replied to his email saying hi Christina Unfortunately, that's not a question we can really answer. We don't deal directly with the positions being held on our end. While Accusip Service Pro does obviously hand out the new Qsip number, it's obviously the responsibility of the transfer agent to issue these new inventory of shares, and therefore, she said you would probably need to take that up with the broker or the exchange and the transfer agent on which the security is held.

My educated guess would be that the short positions do need to be closed, but I can't say that definitely as I don't have knowledge of any links that would state that. So it seems even right now in 2022, the Qsip Service Pro is still confirming that they believe the shorts have to close during accusive change. And obviously, if the shorts do have to close during the conversion and during the reverse split, that seemingly would cause the aimsy squeeze. So even though the Q-sip Service Pro is taking a bit of a blind eye here, saying they don't know exactly what's going to happen happen and they can't say for certain, they still believe that shorts do have the clothes.

And as Stephanie tweeted she said, you know the reason why I think The Regulators are turning a blind eye is that AMC is going to be like a nuclear bomb on the global financial markets. She said, there's never been anything like this before. Retail is the whale. We just didn't know it until January of 2021..

these hedge funds and market makers have never created synthetic shares on the scale of AMC and Gamestop Ever before they've never faced a giant movement, not just containing of a few hundred or a few thousand people, but containing of millions and millions of individual Apes These hedge funds and market makers have buried themselves deeper and deeper and deeper into the play, continuing to double, triple and quadruple down on their short positions. It's obviously now at the point where these hedge funds are market makers can't close out of their positions through the normal channels without causing the squeeze and without bankrupting their own funds. This would likely Force hundreds if not thousands of hedge funds to sell off their long positions, wiping trillions of dollars off of the U.S stock market, While these hedge funds are trying to get us to sell our shares below the current market price so they can cover without causing the squeeze, that's obviously not happening for them. Therefore, at some point they will be forced to cover and close out of their positions, causing the squeeze, bankrupting their own funds, and causing a further market crash.

Let's see just how big this scale really is: G-Man Crypto Tweety That Citadel has 65 billion dollars of security sold and not purchased Susquehanna On top of that, has 78 billion of security sold and not purchased and together that's a total of 144 billion dollars. Now obviously remember these security sold and not purchased our synthetic short positions potentially where the Q-sip number has changed and these positions are now dead on their balance sheet. On top of that rat toy Added saying that Hang Loose has an easy trillion dollars from all of these major Banks and major hedge funds all doing the exact same stuff. These hedge funds aren't just shorting a few million dollars of AMC shares, they're not even shorting Brilliance.

In total, they're shorting to the tune of trillions of dollars. obviously not just on AMC but on AMC GameStop and all of the other meme stocks. Now you may remember, back in June of 2021, Adam Aaron went against his decision to dilute the flow, doing what we the shareholders wanted. Vecco tweeted saying I voted no last time to Adam Aaron because I didn't understand fully and truly what was going on and how silly he fought for our beloved company in the past.

In January and in June when AMC diluted it caused a massive run-up. but obviously on the 5th of July that is when we said no to no more dilution. Since the names, he has fallen from around 46 dollars per share all the way down to four dollars per share. and now I personally believe that we have the opportunity to make things right.

We said no to dilution back in July of 2021 and the price has fallen ever since. But now Adam Aaron is presenting us with an opportunity City that he thinks could cause the empty squeeze. It's an opportunity that would make Adam Aaron even more. Rich Obviously, Adam Aaron holds millions and millions of shares of AMC If AMC does squeeze, Adam Aaron could potentially become a billionaire and therefore stunt Vision has collated a simple look at the pros and cons of a Novo and a yes.

Though if we vote no and AMC does squeeze, it proves that we the Apes were right and we the Apes will be very happy at the same time. It also destroys the hedge funds, but it means that AMC and Adam Aaron were wrong if we vote no. But the hedge funds continue to push the price down, it's entirely our full. Adam Marion has given us not one but two opportunities to potentially cause the squeeze and we voted no both times.

If we vote Yes, an AMC doesn't squeeze. it finally proves once and for all that Adam Aaron and AMC are not on our side. AMC could continue to get pushed down after the reverse split meaning it would be entirely Adam Aaron and AMC's full. but if we vote Yes her name is, he does squeeze.

It's a win-win-win in all situations where the Apes will be very happy after the squeeze, it proves that AMC and Adam Aaron was right and it proves the existence of synthetic shares leading to stock market reform in the future. It destroys those hedge funds it will make Apes Rich It makes Adam Aaron rich and it leaves the stock market reform in the future, as well as it exposes the significant amount of synthetic shares. Omarion has given us an opportunity to potentially cause the squeeze while we voted no in the past and all it led to was the falling AMC price. I Believe that this time we should vote Yes I Believe that we should vote Yes based on Adam Aaron's recommendation and the fact that Adam Aaron says that he fights for us and it seems that Exile Securities believes in Adam Aaron and believes that the mother of all short squeezes could be approaching very soon.

Christian Wardwick saying Exile Securities loads up with 113 000 calls and 59 000 puts to hedge. The calls are currently worth 5 times less than the purse. He said. despite XR holding almost two times more calls than puts, the calls are still worth less.

so he thinks these calls are out of the money with high strike prices. Obviously, while buying out of the money short-term dated options isn't necessarily a great idea if AMC starts running up and he's out of the money, calls become in the money. I Mean these hedge funds are forced to hedge for these in the money calls by buying agency shares? Therefore, XR Securities is helping out to amplify the mother of all short squeezes by buying these out of the money calls for when they become in the money. But guys, be sure to let me know what you think down in the comments below.

And as always, guys, be sure to ding that notification Bell because that way you'll be alerted when I upload a new video. Cheers!.