Quibi was supposed to be a major player in video streaming market with their paid subscription for 10 minute videos. They raised $2 billion of venture capital funding to create original content and launch their service. Unfortunately it was a complete disaster the investors lost everything.
Join our free Discord Server: https://discord.gg/VBd6cA4jUt
Check out our second channel, The Economic Outlook:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQUOscigSQWCVG8m-ZC8wiw
#WallStreetMillenial

What's up guys and welcome back to wall street millennial on this channel, we cover everything related to stocks and investing in today's video we're going to talk about a startup that had the potential and financial firepower to challenge the juggernaut. That is youtube and other video streaming services. Its name was quibby. You may have heard of it before it's the short form, quickbite platform that launched in the first part of 2020..

It focused on short, 10 minute video clips to be viewed exclusively on mobile devices. It was supposed to be kind of like youtube or tick tock, except that was a paid service like netflix. It also had original content that could be commissioned. That was, of course, only available to the paying customers.

You might think that early 2020 would have been the perfect time for video streaming services with stay-at-home orders just starting. It seemed like perfect timing. Unfortunately, even after spending billions of dollars on marketing and original content, the service flopped epically in the same year that launched it was shut down. It was one of the most disappointing and money losing tech, startup failures of the past several years.

So what exactly was quirby's business model and what went wrong? Let's start at the very beginning, it was founded in 2018 with the ambition to take a chunk out of the consumer video streaming market. That means services like tick, tock and youtube on the free end and netflix, disney, plus peacock, etc. On the paid end, it was also mobile-based making. It also compete with instagram snapchat and the like.

Their big selling point was the idea that all the content on the app was supposed to be in 10 minutes or less. In reality, the majority of it was actually less than 8 minutes. This allowed it to focus on short videos and series that you would watch if you were in between doing things, for example, if you're just waiting in line at the bank or on the subway on your way to or from work, you might pull out your phone And watch an eight minute episode of something. The idea was that you might not want to start an entire 20-minute episode of a normal tv show.

It was a way to fill in the gaps in your day without being a huge time. Commitment, quibby was also supposed to target mobile consumption. The content on the app was designed to look good, whether being viewed vertically or horizontally, as if it were shot for both orientations, which was a pretty cool feature. Considering that, usually, when you turn your phone while watching something like youtube, the whole video just shrinks to the width of your screen.

It initially had no capacity to be viewed on a computer or tv. The two features of having the content be short form video and focusing the entire service on mobile, supported, quibby's, overarching goal of filling a new niche. That niche was to fill the times when people were waiting for things like waiting for the subway to arrive. They really pushed the on-the-go feel for the app.
This was their way of differentiating themselves from the competition. Unlike netflix, you could comfortably watch quibby without sitting down at your computer or tv, but the content was still supposed to be professional and high quality, surpassing instagram or youtube in terms of the professionality of the content. In all fairness, it was a very creative and intriguing business idea and it had the business acumen behind it to power its strategy. Their ceo was meg whitman whitman is extremely well known in the business community for holding high up executive positions in numerous powerful american companies.

She started her career after graduating college from princeton university and harvard business school for her mba. She worked as a brand manager at procter gamble. Back then procter gamble was a very prestigious company to work for in their marketing division. It's a marketing company at the core, and to this day it remains in the top three us companies by online advertising spending after procter gamble.

She briefly did business consulting work at one of the big three consulting firms. She then went to disney to work, as vice president of strategic planning throughout the 80s and 90s. She worked in marketing at many different, powerful companies and led many successful marketing campaigns in the late 90s. She left the world of big business to work for a tech startup that startup only had 30 employees and 4 million dollars of revenue when she joined it was an internet company with an unattractive website that frequently crashed, but over the next decade she built it up Into an internet ecommerce giant which you undoubtedly know as ebay for her success at ebay, she was widely applauded as one of america's most capable ceos.

So, ten years later, when she became ceo of quibby, it's no surprise that the expectations were high. Any startup would love to have someone with her track record. As ceo, she saw the opportunity to take market share with quibby's short form, video streaming, offering and leaned in together with the former disney chairman and co-founder of dreamworks jeffrey katzenberg. The talent and leadership at quibby was definitely there with their impressive executive.

Suite kubi was also able to attract pretty much any amount of capital that it wanted. Their investors included investment banking heavyweights, including goldman sachs and jp morgan, as well as entertainment industry giants like viacom and disney. In total, they raised nearly two billion dollars, an incredible amount of money for a two-year-old company. They immediately put that capital to work they advertise aggressively through online and tv commercials.

You might even remember their confusing super bowl commercial from 2020. where's, the car frank. Where are you i'll, be there and equip me? Oh what that could be less than 10 minutes? The ad was confusing and failed to convey what quibby actually was. It honestly seemed more like an ad for a food delivery service than for what it really was.
It was widely considered to be one of the worst ads of super bowl 54.. The app finally launched officially in april of that year, here's what meg whitman had to say about it. Meg, it's good to see you under these unusual circumstances, um. I thought of your company, of course, given it would have seemed that it was well positioned to capture people who are on the move, and we are an economy right now in which people are not on the move.

They're home uh did that hurt the launch at all, or were you still pleasantly surprised? Well, first of all great to see you again, as you said under these unusual circumstances, but it didn't hurt us at all. We had 1.7 million downloads in the first week, which exceeded our plans and our expectations and the app's very popular, and i have to say it's one of the most successful launches of a completely new brand and a completely new app and interestingly, we did see that People are watching quibby seven in the morning till seven at night. During their in-between moments, we thought the in-between moments before covet 19. We thought the in-between moments would of course be out and about commuting, etc.

Well, it turns out people have in-between moments at home in between zoom calls in between wrangling. The kids in between you know taking care of the house, and things like that. So we don't actually think it hurt us we're delighted by the launch, despite meg whitman's optimism, about the launch, the actual service quickly, flopped, it never made it higher than the top three most downloaded free apps on the apple app store, even after spending 5 million. On a super bowl ad after a week, it fell outside the top 50 apps on the app store.

The number of downloads was obviously much lower than expected, and the executives quickly started to defend the lackluster opening. Their last hope was the fact that they offered a 90-day free trial, which some people did take by june. They were reportedly on track to make about 2 million subscribers by the year's end. That probably would have been impossible without the free trial.

Even so, it was only about a quarter of their 7.4 million subscriber prediction. Reality was off to the worst start possible for quibby. When the 90 day free trial started ending for users, even more bad news came, they were unable to convert their free trial users into paying subscribers. Some reports had the number as high as 90 percent of users canceling their subscriptions at the end of their trials.

There. Just wasn't enough interest in the platform to sustain it. In late august, meg whitman returned to cnbc to talk about the business. You love a challenge.

It would appear you've set yourself up for quite a challenge here when it comes to quibby. We won't quibble over the numbers uh, but i think it's fair to say that perhaps the launch has been a little less than had been anticipated. What do you tell people right now in terms of the future of that company and what your hopes are for sort of getting it on track? Well, i always knew this would be a challenge whenever you do a startup. It's a challenge and what we are doing is creating a new category.
Remember our use case was mobile, on-the-go, viewing holiday, uh hollywood quality content for your mobile device, and we did get off to a bit of a rocky start. We launched in the middle of a pandemic by the way i wouldn't recommend that to anyone it can probably be debated whether or not quibby's lack of success can be blamed on launching during a pandemic. It is true that their on-the-go focus was upended by the pandemic. In that sense, it was just the worst possible timing for the startup, but in her earlier interview with david faber on cnbc, she said that in the first few days after launching they saw encouraging watch patterns in their viewers, she said that their viewers were still watching.

Quibby between 7am and 7pm, in between zoom calls and other things, even inside the house. On top of that, all streaming services should have had a boost from the stay at home economy overall viewership for on-demand video services, skyrocketed across the board during the pandemic netflix. For example, smashed estimates for subscriber growth in the fourth quarter, bringing their total subscriber growth for 2020 to an incredible 37 million disney plus was another huge winner from the pandemic and with 73 million paid subscribers by the end of the fourth quarter was cited by the Ceo as a key bright spot for the entire company, if quippy truly had a viable product, it would seem strange that they wouldn't be able to ride the same rising tide as netflix and disney plus, and it wasn't just the case that was just the more casual Viewing that was struggling either youtube became one of the stars of google's financial results, growing revenue by 50 during the pandemic even snapchat. Another mobile-only platform massively grew its revenue in users even after years of struggling to stay relevant.

In essence, all of the video streaming services saw the pandemic as a godsend for their user and revenue growth. So then, why did quibby fail, even though their whole thing was to target the on-the-go lifestyle? It's hard to believe that the pandemic alone caused its failure. It seems more plausible that the business model just wasn't viable people just aren't that interested in yet another streaming service, especially another subscription that they have to commit to and keep track of. The content on the app was fine, but not engaging enough to replace real tv shows and movies on services like netflix and the app didn't foster networking between users through things like youtube's comments, section or sharing like on social media.
Also, it didn't even have the option of letting users view on laptops and tvs. They tried to lean into the trend of mobile first and complement the fast pace of modern society with their quick bite content, but for one reason or another, it just didn't. Stick. Quippy's failure also suffered from fighting an uphill battle on three faces.

It's really hard to create a new category, and that is exactly what quibby was trying to do. Nothing like their product existed before, which both gave the potential to discover a gold mine of opportunity and the very high risk of striking out. Second, the industry they chose is an incredibly difficult business. Entertainment has produced more than its fair share of failed and struggling businesses and, for the most part, only the big names can make it and third, they are up against some of the most formidable competition in the world.

Netflix, google, amazon and even facebook, through their owning of instagram, all competed in the same space. Those companies have virtually unlimited resources and spend literally tens of billions of dollars every quarter tuning their algorithms and creating engagement among their users. Even if the industry wasn't inherently difficult enough, trying to find or create value where all the incumbent juggernauts have already been is probably a recipe for disaster in october of 2020, just six months after their highly anticipated launch, quivi finally threw in the towel they shut down And liquidated all their remaining assets. In early 2021, they sold their entire content library to roku for just 100 million dollars.

Nearly 2 billion of investor money, including more than a billion dollars spent on creating original content, was lost because of the well-known difficulties of starting a new company in an entirely new category. Meg whitman and jeffrey katzenberg probably will retain their top-tier reputations in the business and entertainment industries respectively, especially since they can blame the pandemic for quippy's failure. Also, they both had the foresight not to fund the startup with their own money and meg. Whitman is still one of the world's richest people, but for their investors and for viewers who witness quibby it will go down in history as one of the biggest and most costly flops in startup history.

Alright, guys that wraps it up for this video. Let us know about your experience with quivi in your reaction to their super bowl commercial. Also, if you have other opinions on factors that led to quibby's failure, let us know in the comments below if you enjoyed this content, make sure to smash the like button and subscribe. So you don't miss future uploads in the meantime.

Thank you. So much for watching and we'll see you in the next video wall street millennial, signing out.

By Stock Chat

where the coffee is hot and so is the chat

33 thoughts on “How quibi lost $2b for investors”
  1. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Kevin Williams says:

    Soon it will be how Hedge Funds lost billions to AMC army or Apes!!! Apes together strong!!!

  2. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jennifer P says:

    I think is because they tried to do something between tik tok and netflix and people did not go with it because we already have those services. And also they spent so much hiring many A-rated stars to be part of it and it did not work.

  3. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Scared Folks says:

    Kids just want memes and stolen reposts these days. It’s sickening I’m going to throw up.

  4. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Finbarr McGrath says:

    The money wasn’t lost. It was taken from some very rich people and distributed into the economy. If the business was successful it would have made a small number of very rich people even richer. So we be good with this outcome.

  5. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Trade Logikk says:

    I don't know why people put so much emphasis on downloads for apps.
    Just because I download something to check it out quick doesn't mean I'll actually use it or didn't just almost immediately delete it…
    Number of downloads does not equate to actual users.

  6. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Michael Smith says:

    “Mobile first” should NOT mean mobile only. It should be an acknowledgment that mobile users are not second class citizens.

  7. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Michael Smith says:

    Mobile only? There’s the problem right there. If I can’t watch it at 2x, forget it.

  8. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars E S says:

    you failed to mention that before Quibie, she was CEO of HP where she was failing miserably and there were reports of her crying at board meetings

  9. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Ramy says:

    They already have investors and can easily get ads to make more money but getting customers to pay was why it failed. Customers have other options that are free.

  10. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Angel Cuevas says:

    This sounds like a terrible idea. I can’t believe any executive would think this was good.

  11. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Andrig Miller says:

    Funny thing, I never knew about this at all! The basic idea didn't strike me as a good one though. It almost sounds like a subscription based YouTube, except with expensive to create content.

  12. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Richard Neal says:

    Meg Whitman is a great example of what happens when idiot leaders get promoted upwards so as to get rid of them.

  13. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jason Roggasch says:

    It doesnt matter how much money you have apparently, because Meg Witman with all her cash still looks like John Lithgow in a terrible wig.

  14. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Dee'sNutz says:

    Yeah, let's not let our customers use their giant TVs or high-end PCs….. Smart tech company…..

  15. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Ahndeux says:

    Never trust a company where even the CEO does not have a personal stake in the business.

  16. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars F. D. says:

    Hilarious! That's such a rookie mistake: over-estimating the relevance of the hypothetical "niche" while ignoring the actual, validated consumer needs. Well, the missing subscribers were the hard data they failed to obtain before launching!

  17. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Bill LaBrie says:

    These boomers didn’t research how their target market watches TV. Millenials and Zoomers use it as wallpaper, streaming some shit on Netflix while they distract themselves with something interactive on their phones. Quibi took over the phone screen and didn’t even allow streaming to a TV set. They screwed the pooch so hard the pooch died.

  18. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars 3D-PT says:

    This felt like the good idea fairy struck them w a 2×4. Their business niche was promising and creating unique pro content would put them against netflix. But they screwed the pouch so bad here when they could not capatlize on the pandemic.

  19. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars xerotolerant says:

    It wasn’t a Netflix ripoff. To be honest a 2B investment in a straight Netflix clone might not be too bad an investment.

    It was just unhindered, unmitigated garbage

  20. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Noah T says:

    “People were waiting for things like waiting for the subway to arrive”

    Genius writing right here

  21. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars JJ Bwllng says:

    seems to be a nice indication of how someone feels about the business they are starting if they are unwilling to invest their own money into it at the start.

  22. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Troy D says:

    I would rather watch a ten minute video highlighting the failure of a company making ten minute videos.

  23. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Paul Berry says:

    You can't watch streaming video underground on a subway. You can in the stations. Also, there's a ton of sub 10 minute videos on YouTube for free and a lot of it is better than TV.

  24. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jeff W says:

    You’re wrong on your first sentence: Quibi NEVER had the “ability” to disrupt streaming services, it was a flawed concept from the start.

  25. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Landon Casey says:

    Used to work for HPE right as she was leaving, given her track record as some below have posted, I had zero faith she would be able to make Quibi work.

  26. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars One Puck Chuck says:

    i don't see how a guy that steered disney down the path to hell helped her cause.

  27. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Raymond Ross says:

    Anyone who calls their social media after a name that seems like "Cheese Jelly" is doomed to fail.

  28. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Dan Brit says:

    I give her respect even tho covid played a huge factor in it failing she never blamed it …yet you hear in effected game devs blame it all the time

  29. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars sarcasticsed says:

    Guys everybody who is slamming this guy for not mentioning her disastrous time at HPE. If you google "meg whitman HPE ceo" there is no single video that pops up which talks about her incompetence. It's all big news fawning over her. Her big speeches etc. No wonder this guy doesn't know about it. Sheesh. The negativity. If you guys know how bad she is maybe upload a video on YT explaining it…

  30. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Michael Harto says:

    Is she living in a dimension where there is no "pause" or "resume" feature on streaming platform?

  31. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars jaysper says:

    What was their business model? Over pay and over charge for piss poor quality content. You can see better content free on Dust or any other number of YouTube channels.

  32. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars maxwell yedor says:

    I think they failed answer the number 1 question you should ask before starting a business, why do you exist? They built the business around people riding the subway, which, sure I guess that’s a thing. However there are tons of people who don’t commute via subway/bus, so that’s a group you can’t tap into. Then they have to hit the video length just right, if they have 10 minute episodes and a persons subway trip is 8 minutes, then why not just watch a 30 minute show? You’ve gotta pause it anyway.

  33. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Paddy Coleman says:

    Whitman may have had a successful career in the past but this came to a crashing halt at HP. Whitman’s incompetent leadership of HP almost destroyed the company. Why anyone would think someone with her recent track record would be a success at a startup like this beggars belief. Just shows you how stupid Wall Street can be.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.