Today I Want to talk about and explain what we need to do to make AMC squeeze. Now you may have seen this document for Bed Bath and Beyond presented in court and it's very, very revealing and I think it reveals exactly how to make AMC squeeze. So stay tuned and let's make some money. And now I'll drive straight in with the key information.

So Gavin Tweed is saying. Can someone explain why Seating Co has 776 million Bed Bath and Beyond shares when the float is only 420 million? that's 181 percent of the flow held by seed and Co proving the float is sold multiple times over. Now first off, let's establish who seed and Co actually is if you didn't know ceiling Co is just a different name for the Dtcc. So that's basically all of the shares registered at the Dtcc through all of these different trading platforms.

Now the second fact we need to establish is, how do we know that Bed Bath and Beyond only had a float of 428 million shares? Maybe they issued some new shares before bankruptcy and maybe that number should have been way higher. Well, from that very same bankruptcy document Under The Heading Common Stock it says Bed Bath and Beyond's common stock has traded on the NASDAQ exchange under the symbol Bed Bath and Beyond. As of this very petition day, approximately 420 million shares of voting common shares were outstanding and issued in a flow. So Bed Bath and Beyond has a flow of 428 million shares.

but the DTC through these trading platforms alone has 776 million. Obviously proving the float has been sold multiple times over for Bed, Bath and Beyond Now not only does Cnco hold 776 million shares in this very document, but there's also hundreds and hundreds of people that are also owning tons and tons of shares. On top of that, with some users even holding as much as a hundred and seven thousand shares. or even more.

so even though seating Co is holding 776 million shares on their own, when you factor in all 46 pay ages of individual shareholders that are holding shares, maybe that number is even over a billion. Now again, some users commented on this list saying I can't see my name and I have tons and tons of shares now Flair replied saying this technically isn't everyone on the list from what I understand only the shares held in AST Now again, you may ask what is AST Well, AST is the American Stock Transfer and Trust company or the AST So I think while Flow is basically saying is the shareholders registered on this list or included on this list is just simply the American shareholders and it doesn't contain European or British or shareholders from any other country. So again, if this list is still not even complete, maybe that number of shares for Bed, Bath and Beyond is actually closer to one and a half billion shares or even 2 billion shares or even more. I Was thinking that maybe this list just simply contains the shareholders that have actually DRS their shares.

and that's why their shares aren't included in that ceiling code. But again, either way, what we can ascertain from this fact is the float for Bed Bath and Beyond is indeed sold multiple times over. And the reason why this is important is because we've not only ascertained the potential for these shares to be sold multiple times over, we're not guessing that this has maybe happened. It's not a suspicion or an accusation.

it's now found and proved in the bankruptcy call. Now again I think the reason why this is important and I think how it does become important for AMC is because this has now been proven in court. The float is sold multiple times over. Guys, be sure to sign up to me with a sponsor of today's video by using the link in the description below.

You can currently receive up to a whopping 15 free shares entirely commission free trading Free level 2 Market Data and most importantly of all, MooMoo is very easy to use and it's very clear and concise. I mean who's also got tons of technical indicators and charting tools? There's also free 24, 7 customer support and you can also trade around the clock with their full extended trading hours. So I Think what we need to do to make AMC squeeze is to ascertain this same list for AMC This list that Bed Bath and Beyond has of all of their registered shareholders and provide it to the judge in the AMC court case. That way the judge would see the float of AMC is sold multiple times over and the AMC is indeed being manipulated.

And obviously that manipulation is not in the best interests of us, the shareholders. and that way the judge could bring in the Dtcc OR Ceiling, Co or Finra or whoever it has to be to force these shorts to close out of their positions. I.E To return a float to what it should legally be and remove all of those synthetic shares I Think to some extent as apes or as an AMC movement, we've kind of lost. Direction Instead of trying to prove the existence of synthetic shares in courts and force the shorts to close, we're spending too long delaborating on the reverse split should we reverse split.

Should we not reverse split? What's going to happen as a result of this lawsuit? Is this settlement too much? Is the settlement too little? I Think we're spending so much time on something that isn't really relevant to the squeeze specifically. I Think we're spending too much time focusing on what's going to happen to the price of AMC after the reverse split in such a minimal fashion. Is it going to fall from thirty dollars to twenty Five dollars? Or twenty dollars? Is it going to go up from 30 to 35 Or 40? And as I said, none of that Is really too important. It really doesn't matter if the price of AMC is 30 or 25 or 35, what we really need to focus on is causing this squeeze and proving the synthetic shares in court to give them no other option but to force the shorts to close.

I think four Bed, Bath and Beyond Specifically, it's already too late as Bed Bath and Beyond has already been delisted from the New York Stock Exchange and has already entered bankruptcy. But it's definitely not not too late for AMC I Think the reason why it's too late for Bed Bath and Beyond is because as CNBC says, it's a perfect situation where the shorts don't have to return your borrow. first. let's hear what CNBC actually said and then I'll explain what that really means to argue.

Hey, was who got into huge duration mismatch? Yeah, right, No, No, but I mean it's a perfect situation. These things on the receivership there was: Zero I Don't think you ever have to actually return your borrow so it's it's a whole situation. and I mean there were plenty of people who made a lot of money shorting STP for example and only putting up what five percent sorting a bunch of shares and you never even have to return and first look as well. So as you heard there from the CNBC anchor, he said it's a beautiful situation or a perfect situation because you never even have to return those bar chairs.

So let me explain what that actually means and why that is actually the case when a company like Bed Bath and Beyond goes bankrupt When you're shorting shares with a legally shorting shares or illegally shortened shares through the creation of synthetic shorts, there's two separate ways where you can realize those profits. You can say shorter stock at twenty dollars per share and then close out of that short position at say, two dollars per share and recognize that gain of 18 per share. Now, obviously, that's pretty difficult for those synthetic shorts to do, because it means they'd have to buy back hundreds of millions, if not billions of shares obviously more shares than is issued in the flow, and it'd likely end up causing a short squeeze when you actually close out of that position. But when a company goes bankrupt, the stock price Falls so low to only a couple cents per share, and you know that it's never going to get back up to twenty dollars per share and you're never going to have an unrecognized loss.

Therefore, you can just sit there with that unrecognized gain in your account, and that gain is always going to be there. But how exactly do these hedge funds recognize this unrecognized gain without closing out of their short position and without returning those borrowed shares? Well, instead of closing out of that position and obviously recognizing that gain by buying those shares, they can simply leave the unrecognized gain in their account and take out a loan from another bank or another fund or whoever it may be and use that unrecognized gain as collateral. If you have an unrecognized gain of a million dollars, theoretically, you can recognize that million dollars at whenever point in time you like. Therefore, you can just take out, say, an interest-free loan for that million dollars with the million dollar unrecognized Gainer Security Because the lender knows they're guaranteed to receive their money back.

So therefore, that's what these evil short hedge funds are doing. They're shorting companies like Bed Bath and Beyond into bankruptcy, leaving that unrecognized gain so they never actually have to recognize it and just taking out an interest-free loan and using that unrecognized gain at security, never having to return those shares and never having to buy back those underlying shares either. But as I've said, if we can get this exact same document that Bed Bath and Beyond has produced in this bankruptcy court for AMC and get it over to the judge, the judge can actually do something about the AMC manipulation. And speaking of which, it looks like Ken Griffin and Jeff Bezos are sneakily planning their next short attack.

As Nazim tweeted, he said, would you look at that Ken Griffin from Citadel Securities was spotted in Miami for the Formula One Grand Prix With Jeff Bezos from Amazon, he's trying to get Jeff to deliver his synthetic Ious that have never been fulfilled or potentially they're planning for their next short Target together. However, Kensington pretty stressed at the moment so he's obviously trying to figure out a way that he can get more money to try and pay for that AMC short position and before I go I also wanted to touch on something I found quite funny which is Matt course saying that he lost nearly thirty thousand dollars betting on the recovery of First Republic Bank Well if Matt cause watched my channel and watch my videos, he'd know that I've been talking about the collapse of Bank since December of 2021 and specifically over the last few weeks I've been talking more and more about the collapse of regional Banks and how more Regional banks are likely to collapse over the next few weeks as well. Maybe if Matt listened to my videos and we're still in the EMC Community he'd be betting not on the recovery of First Republic Bank but on their downfall and he would have made even more money. But guys, be sure to let me know what you think down in the comments below.

And as always guys, be sure to ding that notification Bell because that way you'll be alerted when I upload a new video. Cheers.