Today I Want to talk about how Charles pain is once again going after these short sellers, but only this time. he's also going after the corrupt SEC as well now. I Also want to talk about how Robin Hood is on the brink of bankruptcy and how that's going to spoil a short special little plan. So stay tuned and let's make some money.

And now that I've straight in with the key information, So Charles Payne's tweet is saying the Department of Justice and Gary Gensler have been Circle wagging around Banks but they've been letting the shorts run amok and abuse the system when it comes to stocks. retail investors favor Charles Payne is obviously talking about how the Department of Justice and Gary Genslab and the SEC have been ignoring Market manipulation and abusive Short Selling when it comes to individual stocks. But now all of a sudden they're on high alert when it comes to these Regional Bank shares. the SEC and the Department of Justice have done absolutely nothing when it comes to abusive shorting and pretty much all stocks on the entire Market not just in meme stocks, but in Pharmaceuticals and tech companies and everything in between Wayne.

But all of a sudden, as soon as it touches these precious Banks likely stocks that their employees are long on all of a sudden, they want to ban Short Selling outright. On the other side of the fence, you have some investors that are likely short on these Bank stocks that are actually encouraging more bank failures and stock. Since Frank tweeted, he said Shark Tank investor Kevin O'leary says more weak Banks should be allowed to fail and the regional banking system he believes is obsolete As Frank explained, tell me you're short on Regional Banks without telling me your short on Regal Banks Kevin O'leary said let the banks run by idiots go to zero He said that's the great thing about the markets. If it finds the bad managers, it calls them and eliminates them.

He said we have to let it happen here because there's so many idiot managers in banking. and therefore, Kevin Leary believes that we should not ban the short selling on banks again. It's crazy how it's one rule for them and another rule for us. but I'm glad that Charles Payne is here to call it out.

Obviously on TV Charles Payne I believe is a great voice to stand up against the shorts. Not just the shorts that are shorting meme stocks, but these shorts that are shorting all companies in the entire Market in a manipulative way. And now Bad Mojo has actually fixed the recent SEC video. Because you shouldn't be aware of meme stocks and stocks or margin and guaranteed returns, you should mostly be wary of meme backs.

Many of these. Regional Bank stocks have crashed by 70, 80, 90 plus percent so far this year and is likely that more banks are going to continue failing. Especially because as I covered in my video the other day, we know that from 2008 from the last shortest selling ban, the short selling bands actually don't work. They just cause more panic and therefore even if the SEC does try and ban shorts on these Regional Banks it's likely these banks will collapse further and SEC employees like Gary Gensler will lose even more money now.

I Also wanted to quickly touch on and update my video from yesterday where I spoke about the Shields plan and reinforce that video with even more facts. Amy Herself replied to one of those comments saying perhaps you need to spend a little time reviewing regulation Sho She said market makers like Doug Sifu have to stand ready to provide the bit and ask on any Equity She said it's not just on heavily traded stock spot and thinly traded ones too, of which there are many and she said that providing liquidity requires this exemption for naked Short Selling And she's highlighted the bit that says Naked Short Selling is not necessarily a violation of the federal Securities laws or the commission's rules. Again, this really goes to show that this group of people that are against the reverse split are now all of a sudden supporting market makers and known short sellers like Virtue and Citadel they're now all of a sudden trying to convince you that naked shorting is a good thing and that it's actually necessary. And as Crystal as tweeted he said to me listening to this space with Amy and Doug it seems like Doug is trying to act all innocent and that he's the victim due to the rules.

Again, as I said, it's absolutely ridiculous that this group of people that are against the reverse plan it are now all of a sudden supporting market makers supporting these shorts and even supporting Naked Short Selling And as DMP tweeted he said, answer me this please. If retail wasn't close to our objective, why would a billionaire like Doug Sifu be on a space call with only 155 people trying to explain payment for order flow relative to Virtue and Citadel Unless it's a try and change the narrative and convince you that market makers are the good guys and to try and convince you that shorts are actually the good guys? I Also saw a few comments on that video saying that why isn't Adam are an accusingly short sellers of manipulation and why is he saying that synthetic shares don't exist or that more specifically, why is he saying that he's seen no evidence of synthetic shares? Well actually I think if anything, this is a hint to us as I touched on in my previous video before that where I exposed the Bed Bath and Beyond in court has proven they have synthetic shares. You'll remember that document that proved that Sealinko's holding 700 million, Bed, Bath and Beyond shares and the other individual investors are holding a few hundred million. On top of that, when the Bed, Bath and Beyond float should only be around 400 million shares.

Now, this is exactly the proof we need for AMC And this is the proof that proves in court that synthetic shares do exist. Now, this document has not yet been obtained for AMC because I think it's something the courts actually have to request. and therefore, this is exactly why we need to convince the courts to request and obtain this document to finally prove once and for all how many synthetics there are for AMC, we know they exist. Adam Aaron also knows they exist, but Adam Aaron can't speak about it legally without this proof and factual document because we so far do not yet have that document Adam Aaron can't speak on it and that's why we need to obtain that document and prove in court that AMC has all of these synthetics And something else that proves that AMC does indeed have all of these synthetics is a reminder from stocks.

Batman He tweeted saying that AMC has not had this many Ftds since January of 2021. he said that's the month they removed the buy button for AMC and it shot from five dollars to Fifteen dollars in after hours trading in One Singular day alone. He said the amount of Ftds AMC has acquired since then is absolutely ridiculous. Obviously this spike is the January 2021 Spike and it's been obvious, obviously low through the rest of 2021 and 2022.

But all through 2023 has been growing significantly. I expect in May or June that we'll even overtake the number of Ftds in January of 2021, and the price of AMC will spiral out of control during the squeeze, and especially because this time it's likely there won't be any Robin Hood to turn off the buy Button As Frank Nez tweeted, he said Macroaxis gives Robin Hood a 74 probability of bankruptcy, and that's because of falling asset prices and the fact that it's likely that Robin Hood's quarter one losses could widen to the greatest amount seen so far. Investopedia is saying that Robin Hood probably lost 484 million dollars in quarter one of 2023 alone, or 62 cents a share. and they also think the monthly active users probably plunged by 25 to only 12 million users.

Now that loss of 484 million dollars would be a 20 five percent increase in loss from the same quarter one year ago. and this means that Robin Hood will be burning through their cash reserves and will likely go bankrupt, potentially in the next few weeks, or maybe in the next few months now. Finally, Asus tweeted he said so I was fooling around with chat Gbt asking it questions about the AMC conversion and reverse split situation and this is the response that I got. So he asked the question, what happens to short sellers in their short positions when a preferred Equity unit is converted back to the common stock it was originally split from and it does a 10 for One reverse split right after the conversion on a stock that has a short interest of 24 nearly 25 and has a 143 cost to borrow rate.

Now, it replied saying it can have a significant impact on short Sellers and their short positions. The conversion of the Preferred Equity unit back to common stock will mean that short sellers will need to cover and close out of their short positions by buying back the Comet shares. However, the Temper One reverse split will reduce the number of outstanding shares, potentially leading to a temporary increase in the share price, making it more expensive for short sellers to close out of their positions. It says the high short interest of 25 10 indicates that a significant number of investors have shorted the stock, potentially increasing the demand for shares and driving the price up further.

And the 143 cost to borrow rate also suggests that short sellers May face challenges in finding available shares to borrow and may need to pay a premium to do so. So again, this is saying that it sounds like there's going to be a lot of shorts that will have to close out of those short positions and a lot of other shorts that are going to struggle to find any shares to borrow. and even if they do find shares to borrow, they're going to have to pay for them hand over fist. And Frank has also explained why.

he believes that after the reverse split, there's going to be even more shorts. the shorts have to close. He said, remember that after the reverse split, those Apes short positions turn into additional AMC short positions on top and he said the fact they pushed eight down from ten dollars to a buck would suggest they're even deeper into Ape than they are on AMC And therefore, if you think that after the reverse split is going to be 90 percent less AMC shorts, How on Earth they're going to cover their ape shorts and he said that an extra four or five hundred million shares from Adam Aaron isn't enough to cover how very deep they are into their total short position. On top of that, it's also been stated numerous times that Adam Aaron doesn't even plan to issue any more shares unless agency is desperate for cash, which it's not.

He's doing this for reverse split to remove the Arbitrage point between ape and aim. C If anything, he's doing this reverse split because he wants the prices to be the same and he wants the overall price of AMC to be higher. But guys, be sure to let me know what you think down in the comments below. And as always, guys, be sure to ding that notification Bell because that way you'll be alerted when I upload a new video Cheers!.