Interested in seeing my full portfolio with explanations along with buy and sell alerts? Join our Patreon community here: https://www.patreon.com/casgains
Recently, Cathie Wood warned of some inevitable destruction of traditional companies that will lead to a deflationary period. In this video, I cover why Cathie is predicting a deflationary period.
Link to the source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBosUMZQIQ8
Join our free discord here: https://discord.gg/xUWB2ExVcr
My Second Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPkDot_lMk7HB_c68HubbUg
Twitter: https://twitter.com/casgains
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/casgainsacademy/
Soundtracks provided by LCS, Nanobyte, Emphermal, Defyant, and Lakey Inspired
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976: All rights belong to their respective owners

Our world has gone through many drastic changes that have spearheaded the advancement of global civilization. The rise of the digital era may seem crazy, especially with digital art selling for millions yet believe it or not. We have previous revolutions to look back on that. Will help us decide what investments are key for the next decade? In this video, i will cover how kathy wood, the ceo and cio of arc invest recently predicted that deflation is coming instead of inflation.

Welcome to cast gains academy if you're new to the channel. Please consider subscribing for more content like this and let's get right into it. The stock market has risen by substantial amount recently, which leaves many questioning whether the stock market is overvalued. At this time.

One common statistic that investors use to determine whether the market is overvalued is the s p, the gdp ratio? Essentially, what this ratio does is take the s p 500 market cap and divide it by the u.s gdp. These types of calculations are often done by many famous investors, including warren buffett himself. According to the current s p, the gdp ratio, the market is extremely overvalued to a point where the current market is more overvalued than the dot-com bubble. Yet kathy would think, there's something even larger going on here, which is that the gdp statistic itself has become outdated.

However, as you can see in this graph, when we zoom out to the late 1880s, the s p, the gdp ratio makes it seem like the current market is actually undervalued. Yet if we take a look at the s - p 500 pde ratio in the late 1800s and early 1900s, we can clearly see that the stock market wasn't as overvalued as the s p that gdp ratio hinted at ultimately kathy thinks that the whole system is outdated And will soon change for some major reasons you might be skeptical right now, as the overall sentiment is that inflation is coming, not deflation. After all, the government's printed, a significant amount of money during the pandemic, and this should lead to even more inflation. Yet, behind the scenes there's a much larger transition occurring with innovation and innovation always thrives during a crisis like the pandemic, we just went through.

There will still be temporary inflation in the short term, which was demonstrated in the most recent inflation report with a consumer price index or cpi. In the recent cpi report, inflation was up one percent month over month, yet this was fueled by the base effect, because last year we were in a deflationary period, which is the opposite of inflation, and because of that, the year-over-year numbers make it seem like inflation is High right now, after all, when you subtract a negative number, you get a positive number, which is exactly what is happening in the inflation reports. We did get some inflation indicators this week. Actually, today, uh the ppi came out.

It was much stronger than expected. It was up one percent month to month uh. This is not a year-over-year number one percent, so annualized that would be double-digit and that does sound scary uh on a year-over-year basis. I believe we're at 4.3 percent.
So we know that we're in the middle of what's called the base effect. Last year we had declining prices as we entered the covet crisis and uh. We, the the declines, lasted for several months so now year over year, we're going to be comparing against negative uh. Now, before we get into that, let me explain why kathy thinks the s p.

The gdp ratio is not a cause for concern during the industrial age that happened in the 17th and 1800s, the formula for calculating the u.s gdp became outdated. The problem was that the gdp statistic wasn't, including all of the necessary items required to be accurate, kathy thinks that the same situation is happening in the digital age. Overall, productivity is increasing through improvements in manufacturing. For example, amazon has revolutionized his business by using plenty of robots and replacing the need for humans.

Kathy has stated that, thanks to these productivity improvements, the real gdp growth is likely higher than the numbers that we see. The real gdp is essentially the normal gdp, also known as the nominal gdp subtracted by inflation. The reason why kathy thinks that the real gdp growth is likely higher than the current growth rates is because of a simple pattern that occurs whenever disruption happens. When new innovative improvements to products are created, the existing companies or workforce are forced to lower their prices or wages to compete.

When prices are lowered, deflation occurs, which is the opposite of inflation, as the buying power of the dollar increases instead of decreasing. This pattern is seen in many innovations that have taken place in the u.s, which includes the disruption of almost all old technologies, like flip phones, when there's less inflation than reported, the quality of earnings increases as the dollar is worth more in deflationary periods. The current age of innovation is set to create a huge amount of deflation. Kathy stated on twitter that the technology-enabled innovation evolving today is dwarfing that any other period in history.

It is creating good deflation and explosive demand. Battery technology is a good example in arc. Invest's view evs will scale 15 to 20 fold in the next five years. The example of evs is an obvious example of the type of deflation that is coming when battery costs, inevitably decline and evs become cheaper dealers.

Selling internal combustion engine vehicles will have to lower their prices in order to compete. This is clearly seen with the upcoming 25 000 tesla, which will definitely steal plenty of market share from fossil fuel powered vehicles. Ultimately, the disruption of internal combustion engine vehicles will set the stage for the end of many traditional automakers when traditional automakers go bankrupt, huge sums of money leaves a total money supply which leads to further deflation. This is because traditional automakers have plenty of debt that they will default in.
In the case of a government bailout, significant value is lost for the bond and stockholders, which leads a substantial amount of deflation. The government can inject money into the economy in order to counter this deflation, but even if that happens, most customers won't purchase fossil fuel vehicles anyway, especially if evs are much cheaper and they were not investing enough in innovation, and so what we're going to see out Of those companies - maybe not this year, but over time, is a deflation. The bad kind they're going to have to cut prices to move inventory that is going to become obsolete anyway and they'll have to cut christ's purpose very death. Uh other companies who are on the right side of change and have prepared for the new world are going to do very well indeed.

Now we know that deflation created by innovation is likely coming in the near future, but you may be wondering what impacts will this have on the general stock market when it comes to the general stock market, like the s p, 500, innovation technically isn't beneficial or detrimental. There are many innovators in the s p, 500, and there are also many companies in the s p, 500 that will likely get disrupted in the context of the economy as a whole. The bond market benefits from deflation. This is because, when there's less inflation, bond yields decrease with lower yields.

The discount factor decreases. The discount factor is the rate at which money loses value. This statistic is often used to calculate the present value of cash flow. For example, if the interest rate is five percent, then you would likely choose to be given one hundred dollars now, instead of one hundred four dollars in one year.

After all, if you put 100 in bonds, then you will get 105 dollars in one year, which is more than one hundred four dollars. In this example, the discount factor is ninety-five percent, because money loses five percent of its value in one year by multiplying the discount factor of ninety-five percent by 104 dollars. We get a present value of 98.8 dollars, which is lower than being given one hundred dollars. Today, kathy explained that if deflation limits a long-term treasury yield to low single digits, the discount factor used the present value.

Future cash flows probably will fall to surprisingly low levels during the next few years, a massive head fake in the face of higher inflation expectations. In other words, because kathy thinks that inflation will be lower than expected, the discount factor will be much lower when the discount factor is lower, then the cost to borrow money decreases since the dollar maintained its value and guess which companies borrow money. More often, growth companies, essentially the conclusion out of all of this - is to invest in growth companies rather than value. In particular, kathy wood is warning others to stay away from the value stocks that are going to be disrupted.
She stated on twitter that investors need to get and stay on the right side of change. Yet after watching this video, you still may be skeptical of kathy's. Explanation kathy actually thinks that having skeptical investors is completely normal. She explains that the seats for the explosion and innovation today were planted during the tekken telecom bubble in the late 90s back, then investors chased the dream before the tech was ready and while costs were too high after gestating for 20 to 30 years, the dream has Turned into reality, but given the reactions to arch invest research, many investors seem skeptical or reticent.

This wall of worry is healthy. I would prefer to invest in the face of fear than exuberance. All of this change will shock the world completely, especially those that are skeptical of innovation. However, given that we now understand what's going to happen, we can expect and react accordingly.

So i think the markets, the equity markets and the bond market are going to become confused at these dueling forces, uh and um, and we're going to be here to help explain uh as we see it, uh how these forces are going to evolve and who's going To win out in the end, so there you have it kathy wood's warning for the upcoming deflationary period, spearheaded by innovation. Let me know whether you think kathy is right and which growth sucks you're investing in at the moment. If you enjoyed this video, please hit the like button and don't forget to subscribe and i'll see you in the next one.

By Stock Chat

where the coffee is hot and so is the chat

31 thoughts on “Cathie wood: massive deflation is coming after substantial inflation”
  1. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars michael boultinghouse says:

    deflation far worse than inflation. deflation is the bottom of a depression. complete stagnation until a war breaks out. like pearl harbor

  2. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Steven Carithers says:

    I agree with Cathie. Further, she does not use this, but it also fits with Harry Dent who uses demographics as his underlying measurement for asset prices. We are in the Gen X economy. Gen X is a smaller generation to the Boomers and the Millenials. Gen X is in it's peak spending years. It is also a generation about 30% smaller than the past one and the one up coming. The demand dropped by 30% is a devastating level. The up coming generation is sold on technology, the next wave pushed by them will drive up the new technologies as the old ones die.

  3. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Oliver Allen says:

    I donโ€™t think these people know what happens when you print 40% more money in 12 months than has ever been printed in 200 years.

  4. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Yew Weng Lee says:

    The analysis is plainly wrong and overly simplistic. Replacement of obsolete products (e.g fossil fuel vehicles) by innovative products (EV) does not necessarily lead to deflation unless the innovation itself reduces the cost of production and subsequently the price of goods. The fact that soon to be obsolete products need to endure price discounts to encourage purchases implies that many are switching to and buying more higher priced innovative products. If innovation causes deflation, my dollar today should have more purchasing power than it has 30 years ago.

  5. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Karim Haroun says:

    Fed has a printing press, there won't be deflation.

    Twin deficits always results in inflation at least in the medium to long term.

  6. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars MrZozue says:

    The video is very well made, however i do not agree with the idea. We must first see it to believe it. And today all we see is consumer goods inflation and asset hyperinflation, hidden by cheap credit, endless money printing and manipulated CPI numbers.

  7. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Liem Tran says:

    And they'll probably keep saying this for years to come. Lol

  8. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Alok Singh says:

    The fed is paying psychopathic cathy billions of printed money to make this video to postpone the D day and she is buying gold and crypto from it. It is insider news from the highest circle so believe it.

  9. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Thierry says:

    Maybe she is right long term but she is wrong short-term. You cannot inject trillions of dollars into the US economy without triggering out of control inflation for the next few years.

  10. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Bubba Fatas says:

    Donโ€™t pay any attention to this woman! She is covering all bases! She doesnโ€™t have a clue!

  11. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars SpectreTheHorseman says:

    She is right but nobody knows the time table. If anyone hasn't read The Price of Tomorrow yet, get off youtube and do so now.

  12. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Matt Levinson says:

    This is bullshit. Cathys timeline is way off. We getting 5+ years of massive inflation

  13. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Victor Monaco says:

    I like Cathie and I'm an ARKK fan. I've made money with her funds. But she sounds like a crackpot with this deflation nonsense.

  14. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars TheTrueCanadian says:

    Hmm, she can think what she wants but regardless of whether these companies are the future it doesn't change the fact that they are massively over priced. Currently the majority of her holdings already has decades of growth priced in. One disappointing earning report will clobber them. Her Tesla price prediction is sooo exuberant that it ain't even funny.

  15. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars L G says:

    This is absolutely wonderful news! Now when housing prices drop due to deflation I can finally afford to buy a house! Unfortunately, I have to return back to reality and I just don't see this happening. ๐Ÿ˜•

  16. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Stambaugh Designs says:

    sold my $11k of ARK ETFs for $11k in crypto. I'll take profits and move back into ARK once the market figures out what it wants to do.

  17. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Cathy Wood says:

    There is a basic investment strategy that can be phrased as โ€œbuy the dips.โ€ This doesnโ€™t mean go all in while an assetโ€™s price is going down, it means average in as it goes down and/or buy after it settles.
    Further, this strategy is much safer to use in a bull market or a stagnant market, where the general trend is up or sideways (as opposed to a bear market where the general trend is down).
    With that being said F/o/r T/r/a/d/i/n/g and p/r/o/f/i/t/s m/a/k/i/n/g W/h/a/t/s/a/p/p m/e
    <W><H><A><T><S><A><P><P>
    +<1><9>7><8><6><5><2><9><6><1><3>. Thereโ€™s always room in the winning investors corner.

  18. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Peter Fisher says:

    Either way, we are going to have a massive deflation or inflation issue. Fed keeps buying bonds + Biden spending plans = inflation crisis. Fed pulls the plug, interest rates spike, government canโ€™t service its enormous debt and stocks absolutely crash = deflation crisis. Pick your poison

  19. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Greg Golden says:

    Am I missing the point of this video? Last I checked, Ford, GM, etc were profitable and Tesla loses money on every car made. Batteries arent making tesla cars cheaper, the competition coming is what causes tesla to lower prices. Even if it cost 30k to make a car….they turn around and sell it for 25k. There is nothing revolutionary about Tesla…its a basic auto manufacturer. Raw goods in, finished product out. No different than Ford, Toyota, Caterpillar or home builders. There is no mass economies of scale beyond reaching full production capacity and converting as much variable costs to fixed costs. Tesla will never be an amazon, microsoft, google, etc. The valuation is crazy stupid for an auto manufacturer. Tesla doesnt hold proprietary rights to any battery technology, any auto manufacturer can pick up the pieces and mould their own EVs and bring them to market. Tesla is now trying to be a low cost producer…a game that they cant win in the long run imo. The Japanese auto makers will crush Tesla when it comes to manufacturing efficiencies.

    In the long run…Tesla may have been the first into the space, but they have no long run advantage over their competitors….just another name in a sea of brand names.

  20. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Mike Carr says:

    Every one will lose their jobs and wont be able to buy anything. We will have nothing but the Tv will tell us to be happy

  21. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Matthijs de Rijk says:

    Of course they are going to change the calculation system when things look bad…..

  22. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Ah Geez says:

    She is wrong because she is significantly underestimating the central banks power and ability to inflate with the printing of money. If politicians and central banks want inflation, they're getting it. Any deflationary effects brought about due to technology will not be long term. She is very wrong for not talking about how the rent situation is going to destroy the economy when it becomes time to either 1. Make renters pay 2. Evict them because they didn't pay or 3. The Fed prints the rent and pays landlords on behalf of the renters. The idea that the entire automotive industry is going to go bankrupt and surrender to Tesla is absolutely laughable and caused me to take this entire segment much less serious.

  23. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars James Holder says:

    You and I need to see food prices to go down. Then we would believe Cathy was correct and we have deflation. Currently the food prices are going up. Go shopping if you do not believe me.

  24. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars SevenFigures says:

    The CPI 1% number is absolute scam…how is it 1 when everything has increased by far more than that…ask yourself, who puts out the CPI numbers….

  25. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars m_ c_ says:

    Why is Cathie buying bitcoin if she thinks deflation is more likely than inflation?

  26. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Michael says:

    What do you think about Defichain? Sounds really promising to me, especially regarding safety and the anchoring on bitcoin.

  27. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars LaFloppe says:

    "When battery costs inevitably decline". What makes you think this will happen. We will be needing more and more of the limited resources needed to build batteries. Logic would dictate battery costs would go up in this case, right?

  28. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Andrew Alley says:

    News Alert! I went to the gas pump today and the grocery store. THERE IS INFLATION. And I took and UBER to do it. It cost 3x what it normally does. Helicopter money from the government caused this.

  29. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Grace Walker says:

    Bitcoin options has hit $8.8 billion but data show bulls are in favor after BTCโ€™s rally to a new all-time high. the open interest on Bitcoin options has held reasonably steady even as the figure increased by 118% to reach $8.4 billion as (BTC) price rose to a new all-time high. The result of Bitcoinโ€™s price appreciation and the rising open interest on BTC options has resulted in a historic $3.8 billion,To understand the potential impact of such a large expiry, investors should compare it to the volumes seen at spot exchanges. Although some data aggregators display over $50 billion to $100 billion in daily Bitcoin volume, a 2019 report authored by Bitwise Asset Management found that many exchanges employ a variety of questionable techniques to inflate trading volumes.I trade daily with Expert Thorsten Alex trading signals and I have increased my portfolio from 4 btc to 8 btc in just 3 weeks, the accuracy level of his trade signal is just out of the world which is why he comes in highly recommended. Expert Thorsten Alex can be reach out on telgram (@alex_forex2) or WhatsApp (+15402680208), Gmai(thorstenalex02@Gmailcom).

  30. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars OG Reggie B says:

    SPACE AGE TRADER'S ALERT ๐Ÿ“ข WEBULL AND YOUTUBE FOLLOWERS

    LIKE I SAID, IT'S NOT A GAME

    AAPL, TSLA, AMZN & COIN

    ARE MINE.

    Professional, Novice and Guru
    TRADER'S!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    What don't act like it ain't plan to see by now.

    OG 4REAL
    Reggie B.
    SPACE AGE TRADER'S TEAM LEADER

  31. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Casgains Academy says:

    Correction: Cathie Wood was referring to the producer's price index (PPI) instead of the consumer price index (CPI). If you don't know the difference, there's no need to worry. Both indexes will show the same result (short term inflation is here) and PPI numbers are usually roughly equivalent to the CPI numbers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.