Join Interactive Brokers here: https://www.interactivebrokers.com/mkt/?src=casgainsy&url=%2Fen%2Findex.php%3Ff%3D1338
Interested in seeing my full portfolio with explanations along with buy and sell alerts? Join my research platform here: https://www.patreon.com/casgains
Casgains's Recommended Investing/Business Books: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DI8ca5GLEfQXU34uplO3E3w6YHXbvMbK1JR-GxXBeUc/edit?usp=sharing
My Second Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPkDot_lMk7HB_c68HubbUg
Twitter: https://twitter.com/casgains
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/casgainsacademy/
Contact for business inquiries only: casgainsacademy @gmail.com
Over the past few months, Chinese stocks have fallen over and over again. Many investors have taken advantage of these discounted prices for long-term gains. On the other side of the spectrum, many investors believe that there is too much risk surrounding China. Cathie Wood is in the middle of the spectrum, as she initially sold her Chinese stocks, but recently bought back in with a very unique strategy. This video will go in-depth on the future of Chinese stocks and explain both sides of the debate on China.
Chinese stocks have fallen by a substantial amount for a good reason. New regulations have been enforced on education, gaming, data privacy, monopolies, exclusive contracts, and US IPOs. The fact that all of this has happened over just several months is frightening for many investors. The Chinese Communist Party can easily ruin Chinese equities with the snap of a finger. Chamath Palihapitiya, a billionaire venture capitalist and SPAC sponsor, believes that the risk surrounding Chinese assets is far too high to be worth it. Chamath is particularly concerned with the variable interest entity, or VIE structure that Chinese companies use to go public on the US stock exchange. So what exactly is a VIE structure? I’ve seen many people talk about VIEs but never explain the risks of investing in them and how it works. It is currently illegal for foreign investors to invest in most Chinese industries. As a result, Chinese companies have used VIEs as a loophole for this restriction. In the following example, we will use Alibaba to demonstrate how a VIE works. Alibaba operates in an industry that is restricted from having foreign investors. In other words, foreign investors cannot directly own equity in Alibaba. As a result, Alibaba has to create a shell company in the Cayman Islands also called Alibaba.
For the purpose of this example, we will call this shell company fake baba. Note that in the real world, fake baba is actually named Alibaba.
After creating fake baba, Alibaba will now give fake baba contractual agreements over Alibaba’s profits and assets. This is done through a complicated legal process.The contractual agreements owned by Fake Baba give it control over Alibaba’s loans, exclusive call options, proxies, and equity pledges. Essentially, fake baba owns contracts for Alibaba’s profits and assets but doesn’t actually own the equity. Alibaba will now take Fake Baba public on the New York Stock Exchange so that US investors can invest in Fake Baba.
By using this process, Alibaba is able to bypass China’s law against foreign ownership. Alibaba isn’t actually going public on the US stock exchange, because Fake Baba is the one going public. On the other side of the transaction, US investors do not directly own equity in Alibaba. US investors only own equity in Fake Baba.
This type of structure is famously known as the variable interest entity structure, or VIE structure in short form.
The majority of Chinese companies use the VIE structure to go public on the US stock exchange. VIEs have worked well for many years, but there are some major concerns with the structure. First of all, the VIE structure is technically illegal, as it is just a loophole so that foreign investors can own equity in China. Because of that, China may declare that VIEs are illegal at any time. Chamath believes that investing in China is a risk not worth taking because of the VIE structure. On the other side of the spectrum, many investors believe that the potential returns in Chinese stocks outweigh the risks. What’s interesting to see is that many value and growth investors see potential in China. Cathie Wood, the CEO, and CIO of Ark Invest, recently re-entered her Chinese positions after selling them a few months ago. This was shocking for many investors who have been following Cathie, especially because Cathie previously said that China’s new regulations were destroying capitalistic incentives. Nevertheless, she is now approaching the situation in a very unique way. Instead of investing in all Chinese stocks that have disruptive potential, she is now investing in Chinese companies that have government support. More specifically, Cathie has been buying JD.com and Pinduoduo while selling Alibaba and Baidu.

Over the past three months, chinese stocks have fallen over and over again, many investors have taken advantage of these discounted prices for long-term gains. On the other side of the spectrum. Many investors believe that there's too much risk surrounding china. Kathy wood is in the middle of the spectrum, as she initially sold her chinese stocks, but recently bought back in with a very unique strategy.

This video will go in depth on the future of chinese stocks and explain both sides of the debate on china. Chinese stocks have fallen by a substantial amount for a good reason. New regulations have been enforced on education, gaming data, privacy, monopolies, exclusive contracts and u.s ipos. The fact that all of this has happened over just several months is frightening.

For many investors, the chinese communist party can easily ruin chinese equities with the snap of a finger. Chamath polyhapathia, a billionaire venture, capitalist and spax sponsor believes that the risk surrounding chinese assets is far too high to be worth it. Chamath is particularly concerned with the variable interest entity or vie structure that chinese companies used to go public on the u.s stock exchange. So what exactly is a vie structure? I've seen many people talk about vies, but never explain the risks of investing in them and how it works.

It is currently illegal for foreign investors to invest in most chinese industries. As a result, chinese companies have used vies as a loophole for this restriction. In the following example, we will use alibaba to demonstrate how a vie works. Alibaba operates in an industry that is restricted from having foreign investors.

In other words, foreign investors cannot directly own equity. In alibaba, as a result, alibaba has to create a shell company in the cayman islands also called alibaba for the purpose of this example. We will call this shell company fake baba, note that in the real world, fake baba is actually named alibaba after creating fake baba. Alibaba will now give fake baba contractual agreements over alibaba's profits and assets.

This is done through a complicated legal process. The contractual agreements owned by fake baba gave it control over alibaba's loans, exclusive call options, proxies and equity pledges, essentially, fake baba owns contracts for alibaba's profits and assets, but doesn't actually own. The equity alibaba will now take fake baba public on the new york stock exchange. So that u.s investors can invest in fake baba by using this process, alibaba is able to bypass chinese laws against foreign ownership.

Alibaba isn't actually going public on the us talk exchange because fake baba is the one going public on the other side of the transaction. U.S investors do not directly own equity in alibaba, u.s investors only own equity in fake baba. This type of structure is famously known as the variable interest entity, structure or vie structure. In short form.

The majority of chinese companies use the vie structure to go public on the u.s stock exchange. Vies have worked well for many years, but there are some major concerns with the structure. First of all, the vie structure is technically illegal, as it is just a loophole so that foreign investors can own equity in china because of that, china may declare that vies are illegal at any time. Chemath believes that investing in china is a risk not worth taking, and this is because of the vie structure.
We are now in a situation now where the chinese government basically says for online tutoring we're going to cancel the vis in a bunch of other areas, we're going to start with regulation. We could cancel the vis later and so we've essentially put the capital markets. In my opinion, on pause, and so now, let's transition to this other part, it's in china, capital markets in china. I think now are the most volatile.

They've ever been essentially the people's republic of china, the government, the ccp, chooses how and who will make money on the other side of the spectrum. Many investors believe that the potential returns in china stocks outweigh the risks. What's interesting to see is that many value in growth investors see potential in china, kathy wood, the ceo and ceo of arc invest recently re-entered their chinese positions after selling them a few months ago. This was shocking for many investors who have been following kathy, especially because kathy previously said that china's new regulations were destroying capitalistic incentives.

Nevertheless, she is now approaching the situation in a very unique way. Instead of investing in all chinese stocks that have disrupted potential, she is now investing in chinese companies that have government support. More specifically, kathy has been buying jd.com and pin duo duo, while selling alibaba and baidu the ccp's new policies were heavily against alibaba, which indirectly benefits jd and pin dual duo. In fact, in jd's recent quarterly conference call jd retail ceo shu lei took a jab at alibaba.

Shu lei explains that china's new rules are aimed to regulate misconduct such as disorderly capital, expansion and monopolistic contacts. These goals are conducive to jd's, long-term business growth. Shu lay statement hinted at alibaba's record anti-trust fine of 2.8 billion dollars. This fine was given after regulators found out that alibaba was signing exclusive contracts with brands that barred them from selling products on jd.

That record fine, along with jack, moss disappearance and ant's ipo, being cancelled, directly go against alibaba. As a result of this kathy wood is only investing in chinese stocks that are on the government side. Our flagship fund has moved out of most chinese stocks. I think we were out probably late april late may somewhere around there.

It might have been a little bit later. You never know 100 of the time. I think the online education really nationalization. There was a a real valuation killer for the market.
So i think that the market's going to be under pressure from a valuation point of view for a long time now, because that that sort of thing was so unexpected. Even from those of us who saw the the government tightening its grip on the country. But what we have done, we did after this last bloodbath in the stocks we did try and sort through okay, which companies are doing things the government like right and what we're seeing those that are catering to tier three tier four cities, logistics, groceries, so you've seen Us by jd.com jd logistics is a big part of jd.com. I think they own 70 of it, so that's probably been our biggest purchase as well as some pin duo do for the same reason.

But if you were to look at what we were doing in those portfolios, we were really swapping them out of other names that we think are going to be continue to be in harm's way, or certainly under government pressure. Like the alibaba's, for example, kathy wood is only buying chinese companies that have government support, but many value investors are doing the opposite. One website names, data roma tracks, the holdings of all super investors, including charlie munger, bill gates, bill ackman, manish, prabhai, and many more. These investors have beaten the market over the long term and are usually worth looking at in the second quarter of 2021 alibaba ranked as the number one buy for all super investors.

The super investors who purchased alibaba include monies for guys fire and bill miller, all of whom were successful. Long-Term investors in the first quarter of 2021, charlie munger warren buffett's right-hand man also purchased alibaba's stock, which is surprising, given that he has publicly spoken against the vie structure, so why are munger and many others still buying alibaba, despite the risks surrounding the vie structure? I recently spoke with one investor who obtained some information from charles schwab, which is a well-known stock broker. A charles schwab employee told the investor that if china delists chinese stocks, investors in china won't actually lose all of their money. First of all, in the case of a delisting chinese stock investors would still keep their holdings in chinese stocks.

The only problem is that those investors will have to find a place to trade them, given that the vie contracts would still theoretically have value, investors would be able to trade their chinese stocks over the counter or swap their shares for hong kong shares. One share of alibaba in the u.s can be traded for eight shares of alibaba and hong kong. Therefore, if alibaba gets delisted in the u.s, charles schwab would help its clients transfer their alibaba shares to hong kong shares where they would still have some value. The second option would be to trade those alibaba shares over the counter in the u.s either way.
Those alibaba shares would still have value, keep in mind that this isn't the worst case scenario of chinese stocks being delisted. Many investors believe that the nuclear option of a d-listing won't ever happen. This is because, if china does delist chinese stocks, that would start world war 3. and if world war 3 starts, you should be more worried about surviving and your portfolio as a whole.

Aside from the delisting risk, a lot of chinese companies are fundamentally strong. Monish prabhai, a hedge fund manager, who reportedly averaged a return of 25.7 per year over 18 years, believes that alibaba's fundamentals are stronger than the big tech in the u.s. Manisha has allocated over 20 of his portfolio to alibaba, so this is definitely a huge investment for him. What's your overall thesis with baba, it's an incredible business.

If you look at baba and tencent - and you know where they're at and uh the ecosystem and the mood and what they control - and you know all of that - it's and you know look at the tailwinds from china. I mean there's, there's a lot to me to like even more than the large u.s tech uh, just because i think that the tailwinds are so much stronger and uh. There's some serious barriers to entry. Alibaba's business fundamentals are incredible and it's actually trading at an extremely low price at the time that i'm recording this video alibaba is trading at a pde ratio of 21.

that is astonishingly low, especially when you consider that alibaba is expected to grow its revenue by 20. To 30 percent per year over the next few years for context, amazon is trading at a pde of 60, although amazon does deserve a slightly higher premium. Alibaba spends roughly 7 percent of its revenue in capital, expenditures or capex in short form. On the other hand, amazon spends 11 percent of its revenue on capex, so it does deserve a higher pde ratio, but definitely not three times higher than alibaba.

With that being said, there are some serious risks to investing in chinese stocks. Nobody knows what regulations are coming, except for the chinese government itself. Charlie munger believes that china has no incentive to destroy its own businesses, so any regulations likely won't impact the fundamentals of chinese companies by a significant amount. Monger has put his money where his mouth is and has allocated roughly 17 of his portfolio to alibaba they've lifted 800 million people out of poverty fast.

There was never anything like in the history of the world, so my hat is off to the chinese and i think they will continue to allow people to make money. They've learned it works the chinese. I love what the guy said in the first place. I don't care whether the cat is black and white as long as it catches mice, that's my kind of talk.

If you're comfortable with the risk of investing in china, chinese stocks could provide massive returns. Chinese stocks are trading at a massive discount right now and while this discount is partially warranted, it is likely an overreaction one way to mitigate the risk of chinese stocks. Being delisted is to invest in hong kong shares instead of u.s shares. The best way to invest overseas is by using interactive brokers, the top stock broker for investing internationally.
I've personally looked to plenty of brokerage firms, and i found interactive brokers to be the most superior broker for investing internationally by using interactive brokers, you can purchase alibaba's hong kong shares, which likely won't get delisted if you're interested or just curious check out the first link Down below to open an account, i'm not sponsored by interactive brokers, but the link down below is an affiliate link. Thank you for watching. As always and i'll see you in the next one.

By Stock Chat

where the coffee is hot and so is the chat

35 thoughts on “Why china is destroying its own stock market”
  1. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars golafs says:

    also possible to buy hong kong (and shanghai) shares at etoro

  2. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Barbara Connolly says:

    So now ARK are going to back the way the Chinese Government behaves!!!!! Money at all costs.

  3. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Spartacus547 says:

    Kind of like when you buy paper silver not really buying it and it's backed by something that's not really there

  4. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Hasan Choudhury says:

    Great discussions and analysis!
    Best to avoid these as CCP is a mindless monster and it is anti capitalist for the rest of the world and for the Chinese people. Why take a chance?
    I am done speculating about their whims.
    Geopolitically this is a gift from Xi to the USA and the Western countries.
    Chamath is absolutely right.
    So sorry for the Chinese people.
    Very dangerous.

  5. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jeff Austin says:

    Stock are good but ever since I swapped to Forex, I have seen so much difference

  6. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Bernard Werneck says:

    Delisting would start WW3? That's a bit of a far stretch there mate

  7. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Miguel Floriano says:

    I would stay away from chinese stocks because at the end when your dealing with communism you own nothing! remeber that and they tell you also when you buy it and read the fine print.

  8. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Ozzie climate refo says:

    It wouldn't start ww3 ffs Munger is wrong. Also Evergrande is about to cause a lot of problems. DON'T INVEST IN CHINA, give it a fucking year.

  9. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Dude says:

    Thanks. I'll do the exact opposite and buy Alibaba shares. You're a paid shill and I know it.

  10. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Braca Ganon says:

    All i heard was INVEST IN ALIBABA !! I heard it here first 🤣🤣😅😅

  11. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Risk On says:

    Everything can be explained with China's belt road initiative. They want to control the world logistically through Ports and trade.. it seems insufficient to them to just make a whole lot of money but they want control the world's flow of goods in order to control other nations.. In fact that seems to be their main vice . In an effort for total logistics domination they feel necessary to control their businesses. Case in point Alibaba exports most of Amazon's goods. In other words the government wants control of everything (god complex).. Their businesses, they're shipping, they want to control other countries shipments to their country, the products that go into each and every country in the world and of course the countries themselves. Total domination. The belt route initiative is not a New concept they've been working on that for at least a half a century. Little by little very patiently. We've seen this type of behavior throughout history and it never usually ends well for the country that tries to dominate others.

  12. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Nunofyour Business says:

    CCP has realised that shareholders are insatiable parasites. higher and higher handouts every time. whether through dividends stolen from ever worsening products and slave wage workers and/or price increases stolen from the market/next biggest fool…it's the same everywhere today. get rid of the useless thieves..no productivity = no pay. had enough of the scam.

  13. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Efrain Rosso says:

    Stop investing and funding the corrupt CCP dictators and their world domination dream while stealing everyone’s technology and ideas.

  14. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars bb itsme says:

    It's God damn SEC's fault. That kind of arrangement should never be allowed in USA.

  15. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars 5 Star Vids says:

    1st time I ever heard of Dataroma omg !
    Why no one ever tell me ?
    Chi as Government do some some very strange out of stuff, it's like it is schizophrenic.
    Good valuable stuff mate.

  16. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Yang Cao says:

    Because in the USA, the government mostly serve the interest of bug companies, at cost of the people if necessary. In China it is the other way around.

  17. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Rusty Trombone says:

    Buy the dip, China makes the world takes. merica doesn’t make anything but mistakes and mattresses. China owns the USA. News flash, you don’t own any company when you own stock, domestic or foreign.

  18. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Shaw Andrea says:

    Investing in crypto is the best way to earn financial freedom.

  19. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Bella John says:

    In few months or no time people will definitely be kicking themselves in regret for missing the opportunity to buy or invest in cryptocurrency. Can my fellow investor's say HELLO.

  20. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Travis Williamson says:

    China delisting would start WWIII??? Uhhh, that's just dumb.

  21. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Debasish Ray Chawdhuri says:

    If Munger thinks China will never do something to destroy some industry, look at their ed-tech.

  22. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars janet sanders says:

    Great context. Everyone needs more than there salary to be financially stable. The best thing to do with your money is to invest it rightly, because money left for saving always end up used with no returns. I started investing in bitcoin mid November 2020 with the help of a well-known -professional Mr Burton Schilichter and the profit entirely funded my recent duplex.

  23. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars littlemonkey321 says:

    i highly recommend to watch documentary china hustle where they expose these fake chinese companies

  24. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars YeeYao Phang says:

    Many zombie companies. Soon US stocks will follow too 😈 can’t bail them out forever right? Can you? 😈

  25. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Raw and Cooked Vegan says:

    I don't like how American investors indirectly support China by investing in Chinese companies. See Hong Kong, See North Korea. Get out of Chinese business until the CCP is thrown out.

  26. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Sohan S says:

    because CCP is facing backlash/financial crunch, its CPEC and other projects are big burners, large expenditure on defense etc, these big companies/celebrities are easy catch, plus it's perpetual gains in terms of vast amount of public data that ccp can use to fine china civilians down the line based on any arbitrary rules. sadly with so much crackdown Jack Ma etc will all either behave like chained puppies or give up on their assets, ccp will run these companies as they please to. 100 million hooligans led by a tyrant xitler are literally controlling rest of china public, so much of surveilance, controls, dont play video game etc nonsense

  27. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jesse Livermore says:

    think about this, japonese stocks went down in very free open env. japonese had whole usa market plus eu other anglo saxon, and basically sold their products anywhere still they went into recession their companies and products are way better then chinese, japan didnt had friction with other countries and full support from japanese gov to expand and usa support on several levels, chinese companies are worse in every way, capital and growth are tied to leeches from ccp, china is nothing but a unfree economy that needs foreign capital to steal while denying foreign capital the rights to own anything or take part in the profits, make up your own mind what will happend next.

  28. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Richmond says:

    Cathie wood would be an easy target for China who hates people like her.

  29. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Glass Dome says:

    I wouldn’t;t go near VIE’s – illegal, but also corporate structures can change at the drop of a hat – what happens when they set up Fakebaba 2 and Fakebaba is worth zero. Lots of significant losses could happen so easily. Yes, paper upside, but timing would need to be really spot on and no one can do that

  30. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Sundevil says:

    Buy all you want….When China wants to cut it off your screwed.

  31. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars love&peace says:

    Foreign investors like us aren't concerned with the well-being of the Chinese citizens, only the China government is. They do what they need to do. You do what you need to do. Can't have the cake & eat it too.

  32. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars dave lewis says:

    pull out of anything associated with CHina or George Soros.

  33. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars D says:

    Come on delisting will not start a WW3 , you lost me
    I don’t think you understand what world war is defined as

  34. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Richard Fox says:

    I'd never invest in Chinese companies. If a Chinese company commits fraud to pump and dump their stock on Western markets, they'll get away with it. There's no extradition from China to other countries. So Chinese businesses have no incentive to NOT commit fraud.

    China is asshoe.

  35. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Βακουφτσής Ιωάννης Κυριάκος says:

    If an investor can't understand , that is stupid to buy stocks in any Country where there are no elections , no Democracy then I guess he deserves to be ruined. Then you are speculator my friend and as a speculator you deserve to be ruined.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.