Today I Want to talk about how the shorts are trying to infiltrate AMC to take control of the decision making to force the company into bankruptcy. Retail investors aren't selling and Shorts clearly cannot close. The only way they can escape is by pushing the company into bankruptcy, but with AMC's record setting quarters, that's now the table unless the shorts can muscle their way in. So stay tuned and let's make some money.

And now I'll drive straight in with the information. So first, let's talk about AMC's record setting quarters and then let's discuss how the Shorts plan to force their way in to take control of AMC's decision making. Ollie's tweet is saying connect the dots on AMC's recent earnings. We can see over the last few quarters through 2022 and now through to 2023, AMC has been setting new records or at least setting new higher highs every single quarter.

So that means not only is AMC currently profitable, but AMC is about to get even more profitable. We know a profitable company does not go bankrupt and a company that is not bankrupt does not get delisted from a stock exchange and does not end up getting seller boxed. The shorts have struggled for over two years now to push the price down and to convince retail investors to sell their shares. Not only are they nowhere closer to getting retail to sell, but they're in an even worse financial position.

The shorts have doubled, tripled, quadrupled, and octapled down on their short positions, putting them at even more risk if the AMC price moves upwards. And as Cash Striker has tweeted, we're now close to Breaking an all-time high. Not just a post-pandemic record, but even a pre-pandemic Revenue record too. She tweeted saying we're getting closer to Breaking The all-time high for quarter three revenues or quarter three box office 2016 is the all-time high recorded at 2.9 billion dollars.

in the box office you can see in 2016, the all-time high was 2.9 billion. in 2019, 2018, and 2017 it ranged between 2.5 to 2.8 billion. and right now we're already at 2.1 billion and the quarter is not over. So far, we're on track to set over a three billion dollar record at the box office, which would push AMC's profitability to new all-time highs.

That should theoretically mean that AMC stock price trades at a higher value than ever before in its history being more profitable than ever before. Obviously, the shorts will try their best to Hold Us Down But Many other institutions out there will be buying a profitable AMC stock. so unless the shorts, these market makers and hedge funds can bankrupt AMC to get a seller boxed, they will lose, especially as AMC is just about to add even more Revenue With this tweet from investor Turf they tweeted saying AMC Entertainment will make non-amsy theaters pay AMC to show the Taylor Swift concert. AMC will serve as the distributor, potentially collecting upwards of tens, if not hundreds of millions of dollars.

This is also a very high margin activity as AMC will just be licensing their rights out to other theaters. So again, potentially hundreds of millions of dollars of pure profit frame. C So let's talk about how the Shorts plan to infiltrate AMC's board to change the decision making. So first, let's talk about what a hostile takeover actually is.

So it says a hostile takeover occurs when an acquiring company or an acquiring hedge fund attempts to take over a Target company against the wishes of the target companies, management and shareholders. An acquiring company can achieve a hostile takeover by going directly to the Target company shareholders which obviously isn't working for them or by fighting to replace its management. So if the Shorts approach us to buy our shares, it's not going to work unless they pay the prices that we want. So therefore, they can't obtain a majority shareholding of AMC without obvious synthetic shares and therefore cannot perform a hostile takeover simply by buying a controlling shareholding.

And even if they could buy more than 50 percent of the flow or 50 of all synthetic shorts in existence as well, doing so would obviously cause the squeeze. So their last chance of performing a hostile takeover on AMC to change the decision making to bankrupt the company is to fight to replace the management. So the Shorts and the Shields have obviously been trying for a while now to get rid of Adam Aaron and his position as CEO so far that hasn't worked for the shorts and it hasn't worked for the last two years. But who does Adam Aaron and the CEO actually report to? So who does Adam Aaron as CEO actually report to you may think the CEO is the tippy top of the corporate pyramids.

You've got new starters, you've got assistance, and Associates you've got supervisors, You've got managers, you've got senior managers, and you've got the chief operating officers, You've got the CMO or chief marketing officer, You've got the CTO or chief technology officer. You've got the CFO or Chief Financial Officer and you've got this CEO or the chief executive officer. but who sits above that position as CEO. Well, if you Google who does the CEO report to it says the CEO is the highest ranking employee within any organization.

They report to the board of directors. So therefore the easiest way to change the decision making at AMC and force the company into bankruptcy. If they can't get rid of Adam Aaron and replace him with an infiltrator is to get rid of some of the Border directors and I Think this is why Over the last few days we've seen a bunch of tweets from influencers asking their followers to appoint them to AMC's board of directors. We've seen stock and crypto plays asking to nominate and elect AMC retail investor Jason to AMC's board of directors and we've now also seen our from Boston tweeting asking if he ran for an AMC board seat.

would you vote him in? We've also seen various different videos on top of that asking if we should put an ape on the AMC board. Clearly, these people are trying to coordinate their efforts together to put an infiltrator into the board of directors of AMC. While I do think putting an ape on the board of directors could potentially be a good idea, we have to be very, very careful on who exactly we appoint as we know there's so many infiltrators in the AMC space already and to me it seems people trying to start lawsuits against the AMC are probably not the kind of people we want on the AMC board of directors. That to me seems like it's just going to cause a ton of problems.

for AMC The decision-making process will Halt and no further change will happen. AMC will not become more profitable because these individuals will try and do everything they possibly can to vote against AMC's decisions, effectively stonewalling the company and causing it to lose more and more money instead of becoming more and more profitable. I Really do think this is the short The Shield's plan. They know that retail investors aren't selling.

They know they can't close because AMC is still on that threshold Securities list incurring tens of millions if not hundreds of millions of Ftds every single day. and they know that AMC is just becoming more profitable. Therefore, the only way they can win is to force AMC into bankruptcy by infiltrating the board of directors to Halt that decision-making process now. I Also wanted to talk about Fidelity the trading platform.

Fidelity So far, three times this month has had regular outages. These outages have not allowed investors to sign in to open or close positions and that's why the rocket astronaut tweet is saying switch to Fidelity They said leave Robert Hood They said while I do think leaving Robin Hood was an excellent idea because obviously Robin Hood turned off the buy button. It seems many people have gone to Fidelity but as a result Fidelity is now breaking I Personally have always been a big advocate of leaving Robin Hood because they can turn off the buy button whenever they like and signing up with a different trading platform like MooMoo again. I've always said you don't have to sign up with MooMoo You can sign up for anyone that isn't Robin Hood or Weeble Many of you signed up to Fidelity Charles Schwab and TD Ameritrade instead, but it seems those same three companies TD Ameritrade, Charles, Schwab and Fidelity are being caught up in this lawsuit with Mullen Automotive.

So far, it seems to me that MooMoo is literally the only trading platform that is not either being sued or is known to turn off the buy button again. Obviously, I'm not saying you have to sign up to MooMoo just maybe sign up to a trading platform that isn't Robin Hood Weeble TD Ameritrade Charles Schwab or Fidelity because these three trading platforms wrongfully sold around 19 million, 7.6 million, and 7.8 million Mullen shares, respectively and those shares were either fictitious or fully paid for customer shares that should have been securely held by the broker. Collectively, these actions led to the unlawful sale of over 34 million Merlin shares owned by shareholders AK As I spoke on the other day, these three Brokers TD Ameritrade Charles Schwab and Fidelity have been facilitating synthetic Short Selling Because the market makers created the synthetic shares and shorted or sold them through these Brokers to retail investors I Think it's funny that those shorts and those shills in the comments call me a moo moo shill consistently when seemingly MooMoo is the only platform not currently caught up in a lawsuit again. I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, but make of that what you will.

So guys, be sure to let me know what you think down in the comments below. And as always, guys, be sure to ding that notification Bell because that way you'll be alerted when upload a new video. Cheers.