π¦ Join the Team! - Private Discord/Patreon - https://patreon.com/thomasjamesinvesting
π Check out the Merch - https://thomasjamesinvesting.com
ππΊπΈ Get 5 FREE stocks worth up to $17,500 with moomoo! - https://j.moomoo.com/006XiL
π Moomoo deposit tutorial - https://youtu.be/gw1BkLVsnjU
π° Get up to $250 of FREE Bitcoin - https://blockfi.com/thomasjames
ππ¬π§ Get up to Β£200 FREE Stock - https://magic.freetrade.io/join/Thomas-James-Investing
Links;
https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2021/34-93784.pdf
https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/legal/rule-filings/2021/NSCC/SR-NSCC-2021-016.pdf
https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/legal/rule-filings/2021/DTC/SR-DTC-2021-017.pdf
https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/legal/rule-filings/2021/FICC/SR-FICC-2021-009.pdf
There are new capital requirement rules at the DTCC, NSCC and FICC. This impacts the liquidity and margin requirements. Institutions are now required to hold 10x more available cash/capital and also DTCC VAR Margin calls are going to be 10x larger!
However, these new proposed rules still somewhat avoid the largest institutions, the capital requirements are big for small firms, but still peanuts for some of the larger players.
However, this change in capital requirements WILL cause margin calls, and they WILL be hard to meet. And if institutions can't meet them they WILL cause liquidations
Social media:
π· Follow me on Instagram - https://instagram.com/thomasjamesyt
π€ Follow me on Twitter - https://twitter.com/Thomas_james_1
π Please be sure to LIKE, SUBSCRIBE, and turn on them NOTIFICATIONS.
Thank you BlockFi for Sponsoring this Video! - Ad
The information in these videos shall not be construed as tax, legal, insurance, construction, engineering, health and safety, electrical or financial advice. IF stocks or companies are mentioned, Thomas MAY have an ownership interest in them -- DO NOT make buying or selling decisions based on Thomas' videos. If you need such advice, please contact a qualified accountant, solicitor, insurance agent, contractor/electrician/engineer/etc. or financial advisor. This is not investment advice to purchase any stock mentioned in this video or any other videos and shall not be construed as anything other than an opinion for entertainment purposes only.
Links included in this description might be affiliate links. If you purchase a product or service with the links that I provide I may receive a small commission. There is no additional charge to you! Thank you for supporting my channel so I can continue to provide you with free content each week!
Video topics:
gamestop, gamestop stock, gme, gamestop short squeeze, gamestop stock explained, gamestop explained, amc, amc stock, amc stock prediction, amc live, amc stock live, amc short squeeze, amc squeeze, amc price prediction, gme stock live, gme stock prediction, gme stock analysis, gme stock explained, gme stock short squeeze, gme stock news, matt kohrs, matt kors, stocks, stock market, investing, trey trades, jim cramer, amc ortex, amc dark pool, amc recap, amc news, amc update, finance news, themaskedinvestor, roensch capital, amc stock news, amc stock update, amc stock analysis, amc stock livestream, amc stock short squeeze, amc stock prediction 2021, amc stock news today, amc stock jim cramer, will amc go up, short squeeze, will amc short squeeze, buy amc, hold amc, amc will explode, this will cause amc to explode, amc dark pool update, amc citadel, amc citadel in trouble, Citadel, citadel fraud, citadel fraud amc, amc margin restriction, amc restriction, what is a margin restriction, amc threshold list, threshold list, what is amc threshold list, amc citadel, ken griffin, AMC convertible notes, AMC convertible loan notes, deregistration of loan notes, AMC S3 filing, iceberg research, even more fud, the suits are losing, amc analyst rating, amc analyst, amc media, fail to deliver, AMC fail to delivers, fail to deliver data, AMC FTD, amc threshold list, amc threshold, amc ftd cycle, amc suspend dark pools, amc share count, amc margin requirements, amc capital requirements, dtcc capital requirements, dtcc margin requirements, new dtcc rules, amc new rules, amc liquidations, amc liquidations incoming
Inspired by Graham Stephan, Meet Kevin, Andrei Jikh, Stock Moe, My Financial Friend, MCash, Kenan Grace, Trey Trades, Matt Kohrs, the Masked Investor and more.
#AMC #ShortSqueeze #AMCStock
π Check out the Merch - https://thomasjamesinvesting.com
ππΊπΈ Get 5 FREE stocks worth up to $17,500 with moomoo! - https://j.moomoo.com/006XiL
π Moomoo deposit tutorial - https://youtu.be/gw1BkLVsnjU
π° Get up to $250 of FREE Bitcoin - https://blockfi.com/thomasjames
ππ¬π§ Get up to Β£200 FREE Stock - https://magic.freetrade.io/join/Thomas-James-Investing
Links;
https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2021/34-93784.pdf
https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/legal/rule-filings/2021/NSCC/SR-NSCC-2021-016.pdf
https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/legal/rule-filings/2021/DTC/SR-DTC-2021-017.pdf
https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/legal/rule-filings/2021/FICC/SR-FICC-2021-009.pdf
There are new capital requirement rules at the DTCC, NSCC and FICC. This impacts the liquidity and margin requirements. Institutions are now required to hold 10x more available cash/capital and also DTCC VAR Margin calls are going to be 10x larger!
However, these new proposed rules still somewhat avoid the largest institutions, the capital requirements are big for small firms, but still peanuts for some of the larger players.
However, this change in capital requirements WILL cause margin calls, and they WILL be hard to meet. And if institutions can't meet them they WILL cause liquidations
Social media:
π· Follow me on Instagram - https://instagram.com/thomasjamesyt
π€ Follow me on Twitter - https://twitter.com/Thomas_james_1
π Please be sure to LIKE, SUBSCRIBE, and turn on them NOTIFICATIONS.
Thank you BlockFi for Sponsoring this Video! - Ad
The information in these videos shall not be construed as tax, legal, insurance, construction, engineering, health and safety, electrical or financial advice. IF stocks or companies are mentioned, Thomas MAY have an ownership interest in them -- DO NOT make buying or selling decisions based on Thomas' videos. If you need such advice, please contact a qualified accountant, solicitor, insurance agent, contractor/electrician/engineer/etc. or financial advisor. This is not investment advice to purchase any stock mentioned in this video or any other videos and shall not be construed as anything other than an opinion for entertainment purposes only.
Links included in this description might be affiliate links. If you purchase a product or service with the links that I provide I may receive a small commission. There is no additional charge to you! Thank you for supporting my channel so I can continue to provide you with free content each week!
Video topics:
gamestop, gamestop stock, gme, gamestop short squeeze, gamestop stock explained, gamestop explained, amc, amc stock, amc stock prediction, amc live, amc stock live, amc short squeeze, amc squeeze, amc price prediction, gme stock live, gme stock prediction, gme stock analysis, gme stock explained, gme stock short squeeze, gme stock news, matt kohrs, matt kors, stocks, stock market, investing, trey trades, jim cramer, amc ortex, amc dark pool, amc recap, amc news, amc update, finance news, themaskedinvestor, roensch capital, amc stock news, amc stock update, amc stock analysis, amc stock livestream, amc stock short squeeze, amc stock prediction 2021, amc stock news today, amc stock jim cramer, will amc go up, short squeeze, will amc short squeeze, buy amc, hold amc, amc will explode, this will cause amc to explode, amc dark pool update, amc citadel, amc citadel in trouble, Citadel, citadel fraud, citadel fraud amc, amc margin restriction, amc restriction, what is a margin restriction, amc threshold list, threshold list, what is amc threshold list, amc citadel, ken griffin, AMC convertible notes, AMC convertible loan notes, deregistration of loan notes, AMC S3 filing, iceberg research, even more fud, the suits are losing, amc analyst rating, amc analyst, amc media, fail to deliver, AMC fail to delivers, fail to deliver data, AMC FTD, amc threshold list, amc threshold, amc ftd cycle, amc suspend dark pools, amc share count, amc margin requirements, amc capital requirements, dtcc capital requirements, dtcc margin requirements, new dtcc rules, amc new rules, amc liquidations, amc liquidations incoming
Inspired by Graham Stephan, Meet Kevin, Andrei Jikh, Stock Moe, My Financial Friend, MCash, Kenan Grace, Trey Trades, Matt Kohrs, the Masked Investor and more.
#AMC #ShortSqueeze #AMCStock
Welcome back to the channel everyone today i want to break down the new dtcc rules around capital requirements and also the new rules around security-based swaps. So stay tuned and let's make some money, and now i want to dive straight in with the key information. So, let's start by talking about the new proposed rules around security-based swaps. Obviously i don't want to read through this full 197 page document, so i've highlighted some of the key impacts and key changes.
So this new rule has been designed and proposed to prevent fraud, manipulation and deception in connection with affecting transactions in or around the security-based swaps. Basically, these new rules are to improve the disclosure and the public disclosure of security-based swaps and also to avoid fraudulently influencing the chief compliance officer of each individual fund. So, firstly, when will these changes take effect? Well, it says: transaction reporting for security based swaps has been required since november 8, 2021, but public dissemination and this improved reporting is going to begin on february, the 14th 2022. So, therefore, even though these institutions are already supposedly reporting more information on their security-based swaps and have been since november, we're not likely to see any changes or real impacts until february of 2022 right now, if an institution is very largely overexposed with their security-based swaps.
At the moment, the only people that know about it are that institution and the dtcc and therefore likely to receive a free pass. But when this information is disseminated publicly to other funds and other institutions, and also us the general public, if there is a fund or an institution out there, that is way over leveraged on the security-based swaps, they will basically be forced to reduce their exposure because, obviously, All of the other institutions and us the general public will be very unhappy if they are so massively overexposed and therefore it wouldn't surprise me if there's many other entities like citadel, that are holding massive short positions through offshore entities and through these security-based swaps. That obviously aren't disclosing their positions that are going to be forced to disclose them in february of 2022 or forced to cover them before the release, so they don't look too bad now. I also want to read this new ruling in section 9, which i think is ridiculous, that it wasn't already a ruling paragraph j of section 9 makes it unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality or interstate commerce, or of The mails or of any facility of any national securities exchange to affect any transaction in or to induce or attempt to induce the purchase or sale of any security based swap in connection with which such person engages in any fraudulent, deceptive or manipulative act or practice makes A fictitious quotation or engages in any transaction practice, or course of business, which operates as a fraud or deceit upon any person, so to condense all that down. It basically makes it illegal for any person to create any fictitious purchase or sales, so therefore makes it illegal to create a fictitious or fake closeout of a security-based swap position. It's surprising that that wasn't already illegal to create fake closeouts. So i do think it's good that these hidden swap positions or these hidden short positions are going to soon be revealed to the public, but now, let's also talk about those capital requirements and those new proposed rules. If you didn't already know right now, you can currently get up to 250 dollars in free bitcoin.
If you sign up to block fire using the link in the description below with blockfi. Not only can you just buy some bitcoin ethereum and many other cryptocurrencies, but you can also earn interest on your deposits and therefore continue to earn more and more bitcoin and blockfi also offer a rewards credit card with an introductory rate of 3.5 cashback on your purchases. Also paid in crypto, therefore again accumulating more bitcoin and more cryptocurrency and when you've generated a massive profit on your investment. Instead of having to sell off your cryptocurrency and potentially missing out on the next run-up, you can just take out a crypto backed loan with block fi.
Therefore, you can get cash to meet your day-to-day expenditure, but you don't have to sell off your crypto. I also personally use block fire and i think it's a very easy platform to use and it has brilliant interest rates for your crypto. So, let's start by talking about the new nscc capital requirements, because this one has the biggest change. So there's two parts that have been changed.
The first part is the equity capital requirements and the second part is the var requirements or the value at risk requirements. So under the previous requirements, the broker dealer would have to have five hundred thousand dollars in excess capital. If they do not clear for other firms or one million dollars, if they do clear for other firms in terms of equity, capital, they'd also have 50 million dollars in equity capital at all times under the new rules. This is now changed to being tiered.
If they don't clear for others, they have to have up to five million dollars in excess net capital, so a 10 times increase, and if they do clear for others, they now have to have up to 10 million dollars in excess net capital. So also a 10 times increase there as well, and instead of having 50 million dollars in equity capital at all times, they now have to have 500 million dollars in cet1 or set 1 capital at all times. So that's a massive 10 times increase to those capital requirements and obviously the nfcc has already received some pushback from institutions. The first comes from samuel at lex securities he said below is dtcc's or nscc's latest proposal they're proposing to increase the minimum capital requirements tenfold. He's obviously complaining and saying: why would a firm that has a margin requirement or var tier of hundred thousand dollars need 10 million dollars in excess net capital? He said dtcc's margin or i guess the dtcc insurance is supposed to account for the risk. So why does a firm that, according to dtcc, could lose thousand dollars need ten million dollars in excess net capital? Now? One point i do agree with is where he says it ignores the mega sized participants that pose real risk for the dtcc and instead discriminates against solely smaller firms. Obviously, we can see here their bar tears are below a hundred thousand dollars. A hundred to five hundred thousand dollars and over five hundred thousand dollars, but in the grand scheme of things that isn't actually very large and i think they need many many more tiers.
If we have a look at robin hood back on the 28th of january, the daily var requirement at the start of january 28th was 1.4 billion dollars, obviously significantly higher than only 500 000. They probably need more tiers in here for say over 5 million over 50. Over 500, and maybe even over 5 billion, but i do think that should require firms like robin hood to have significantly more excess net capital. To obviously avoid what happened back in january 28th, when robin hood had to turn off the buy button to reduce their daily var requirement, obviously, because robin hood turned off the buy button, it brought that requirement down from 1.4 billion dollars to only 354 million.
He said it's simply ridiculous, that a firm that has 500 000 at risk needs 10 million dollars in excess capital, as in 20 times the amount of risk, but a firm that has one billion dollars at risk needs only 10 million dollars, as in one percent of The amount at risk he said if the dtcc felt that it needed to raise the capital requirements, it would target the large firms that actually create exposure. This proposal is a thinly veiled attempt to eliminate dtcc's smallest participants. So therefore, while i do think new capital requirements and increasing those capital requirements, significantly is a good idea. I also think they need to focus more on the larger firms and not the smallest firms in terms of the dtcc.
They are also making equity capital changes. Changing from two million dollars in excess equity capital to 15 million dollars in excess cet1 capital - now i guess this is just a slightly different division, because obviously the nfcc requirements were much much higher now. Something i also found very very interesting is that there's a current dtc watch list an enhanced surveillance list. It says dtc's watch list is a list of participants that are deemed by dtc to pose a heightened risk to it and its participants based on credit ratings and other factors. So specifically, the watch list is a list of participants with credit ratings derived from dtc's credit risk rating matrix of five six or seven. Now i tried to do some searching and unfortunately, this dtc watch list isn't available to the public, but it would be very, very interesting if it was available to the public to see which participants of the dtcc posed the highest risk. That way, we could see which participants of the dtcc and which institutions had the highest leverage and were the most exposed and the most likely to go bankrupt or be liquidated. Now the ficc have also changed their capital requirements from a hundred million dollars of equity capital.
25 million dollars of net worth and excess net capital of 10 million to that same new implementation from the nscc, which is the 500 million dollars in cet-1 capital and therefore a five-times increase from the ficc from 100 million dollars to 500 million dollars. So why is that good for amc? Well, obviously, it means that participants and institutions now have to hold a lot more capital and a lot more cash and therefore can't be as heavily exposed or over leveraged and therefore will have to close some of their short positions or risk liquidation. Obviously, if they can't meet these new capital requirements and these new margin requirements, they will get liquidated and forced to sell off all of their long positions and cover all of their shorts. Now you may say tom: these new capital requirements sound, absolutely brilliant, but when are they coming into effect? So from the nscc paper, we've got a heading, saying, implementation time frame pending commission approval, the nfcc would implement the proposed changes to enhance its capital requirements for members.
One year after the commission's approval of this proposed rule change, so it sounds like a very long time frame, but actually it may be happening right now, so why do i say it might be happening right now. If i scroll down to the member outreach section, it says, beginning in june 2019 nscc conducted outreach to various members in order to provide them with the advanced notice of the proposed enhancements to nscc's capital requirements. Then, at the very top of the page it says the proposed rule change was approved by the risk committee of the board of directors of nscc at a meeting. Julie called and held on december 15, 2020 and obviously one year from this date would bring us to december 15 2021 and therefore these changes could have been implemented last week.
Sometime and obviously, if any members are failing to meet these new capital requirements, they will likely be liquidated next week. Obviously those liquidations do take. Some time could take a few days, could even take a week or two, but we'd expect to see changes from these new capital requirements over the next week or two, and on top of this it seems that chinese creditors are getting desperate to receive their money back From evergrande with claims, totaling 13 billion dollars, but the worrying thing is that evergrande have said there is no way we can repay. So many creditors with our limited resources, said an evergrande executive who asked not to be identified. He said we will. Let judges decide who gets paid and how much and therefore, if the evergrande suppliers won't even be getting all of their money back, there's no way that any of the bondholders will either. There was a little tier list i saw a little while ago of who would be getting their money back from evergrande. First first was the employees, then was the suppliers, and only then later on was the bondholders and the debt holders and then obviously finally, the shareholders and therefore, if ever grind, they can't even properly pay the employees and the suppliers.
Well, the bondholders won't be getting any of their money back and also won't be able to use those bonds as collateral to meet those new collateral requirements. Guys be sure to. Let me know down in the comments below what you think about the new capital requirements imposed by the dtcc, the nfcc and the ficc, and how this is going to impact amc and guys. If you want to stay up to date with all of my latest stock and crypto picks or if you just want some help with amc and gamestop, be sure to check out the patreon and the private discord linked in the description below and become part of, the Team, and as always guys if you enjoyed this video, be sure to check out some of my others.
Alternatively, subscribe to the channel and ding that notification bell, because that way, you'll be alerted. When i upload a new video cheers.
SHORTS ALL OVER THIS CONN CONN THE NEXT MEME STOCK WILL BLOW UP SOON TAKE A LOOK START THE NEW YEAR OFF RIGHT $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ GET IN THE STOCK MARKET BUY THE STOCK CONN CONN GETTING READY TO RUN UP BIG TIME BOLO
SHORTS ALL OVER THIS CONN CONN THE NEXT MEME STOCK WILL BLOW UP SOON TAKE A LOOK START THE NEW YEAR OFF RIGHT $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ GET IN THE STOCK MARKET BUY THE STOCK CONN CONN GETTING READY TO RUN UP BIG TIME OLO
Blah blah blah you all say the same thing over and over. Stock goes down 20 dollars in 2 weeks yet y'all very bullish everyday c'mon get real
there is always a new DTCC rule, but if its not going to be enforced, whats the point?
DTC should make it % of required capital amount of brokerage firm or any other fund, because % is more fair for small firms
< Leaving it in investments rather than my bank accounts has been very remunerative. As A Retiree, I'm earning serious passive income from home
Wow finally illegal to fake close out fail to delivers? I hope that changes game. These guys are worse than cartel..
Buy and hodl AMC for life changing wealth !!! Me and my friends and all my family buy more AMC each week and we are all hodling until 500k per share!! We got this brothers and sisters πππ¦
These rules are useless and won't trigger the MOASS. Major market correction/crash is what we need to trigger margin calls hence, MOASS.
Funny these rules go into effect 2 months from now, but what good are rules with no enforcement
Appreciate you addressing Egrande instead of pretending itβs a non-factor. So many sensationalist out there blaming everything on π€ π· Mostly permabulls and propagandandist
When they said land of the free they meant land of the rich…as in rules dont apply to the rich yet your greatly punished snd get prison time for something that rich prople get a finger shook at them for.
What's to stop a large firm to utilize many small market makers under the large one to circumvent the larger DTCC margin reserve requirement? There seems to always be a way to game the system.
The stock market is the transfer of wealth from the impatient to the patient. We are winning, we can do this friends!
2021 was a big year fo r the cryptocurrency sphere. Besides digital tokens, other futuristic applications like non-fungible tokens (NFTs), decentralized applications (Dapps), and smart contracts have found their way into the virtual ecosystem. While this was on the play, Bitcoin made strides towards mainstream acceptance with institutional investors and stock exchanges accepting it. And if after all that has happened you are still indecisive about getting start then you should seek the counsel of an expert.Philip Rooker has been doing a great job reviewing all chart, trade and techniques on BTC which has enhance the growth of my portfolio to 17 BTC lately.
Awesome information Thomas.
I'll look back at some of these videos after the squueze with a smile on my face.
This is gonna be a perfect set up for AMC with their first ever Rose Parade float on Jan 1 …rally incoming
The legal definition of a "person" is not what most people think it is. We are smooth brained apes not "persons"
Fuck or screw DTCC, these should had been in placed more than 20 years ago, fuck them they already had pushed US economy over the cliff
Itβs all talk Thomas SEC and finra and DTCC they donβt want poor people to wealthy like them all I gotta is hold
Small hedges can start the domino effect if they margin called or they have to close they shorts messing up Kenny boy game. So they rise the limits. We are close! just keep doing the strategy buy and hold. Patience will pay!
Let all hold till 100000$ or More we own 80% of the AMC. They also started buying shares so that when ever it hits 100 or 1000 they can sale them so they can try to fool the apes making us thing the moass is finished. Don't fall for it that's just the same thing they been doing but just at a higher prices just to get apes to sell out of our positions. So the MOASS won't hurt them that much. Remember we control AMC not the sell when we get around 100000 and beyond. Make them hurt bad and let it all burn.
So basically, per usual, everyone don't see the forrest for the trees.
If the dtcc is implementing rules around requirements. That move forward towards the tune of "preventing fraud, manipulation & deception in connection with affecting transactions in or around the security based swaps"… They are literally saying without saying while saying with proof that the market is massively rigged beyond comprehension. If it's in house rigged you've got to not have a brain to come to the conclusion that it's not rigged against "return investors"
Citadel unfortunately has enough money to influence the rules. This is not even discrete. This is in front of your face blatant corruption.
1,150 shares here. I plan on selling 5-10 shares at 10k (making half and profit back). then I plan on selling up to half at 500k a share. then holding half of my entire float to 1 million. if we all do this itll for sure hit 1 million. LETS GOOO!!! Also record yourself selling. BTW I held gme through its peak of 483 when robin dah hood screwed us.